Skip to content

Rumored Red Sox bid for Hiroyuki Nakajima creates questions

Dec 6, 2011, 5:35 PM EDT

red sox logo

5:55 p.m. EDT update: It may be moot: the Red Sox are saying they did not bid for Nakajima. The winning bidder in the posting process is expected to be announced Wednesday.

///

The Red Sox already have a pair of possible starting shortstops in Marco Scutaro and Jed Lowrie, as well as a much-hyped shortstop of the future in Jose Iglesias, so what are they doing bidding on Hiroyuki Nakajima?

The obvious answer, assuming that Sponichi is right about the Red Sox likely having the high bid for Nakajima, is that they think he’s an immediate upgrade over Scutaro and Lowrie. Lowrie’s name has been coming up in trade rumors, in particular with the Rangers. Oakland would also make sense as a destination for Lowrie if there are any legs to the Andrew Bailey rumors.

But is Nakajima really better than the competition? The 29-year-old hit .297 with 16 homers, 100 RBI and a 93/44 K/BB ratio in 566 at-bats for Seibu last season. It’s the first time since 2005 that he’s hit under .300, but considering that they went to a new baseball in Japan last year and offense plummeted across the board, it was one of his most impressive seasons overall.

Nakajima’s track record is certainly more impressive that Tsuyoshi Nishioka’s. Nishioka had the one big season for Lotte in 2010, but it stood out as a career year for him. Then again, Nishioka was just 26 when he signed with the Twins. Nakajima is 29.

The Red Sox have certainly scouted Nakajima if they’re bidding on him, and Bobby Valentine is familiar with him, having managed against Nakajima’s Lions from 2005-09. The Red Sox may see Nakajima as a potential bargain in light of Nishioka’s flameout likely hurting the market for Japanese infielders. His arrival would guarantee that either Scutaro or Lowrie departs prior to Opening Day. If it’s Scutaro and his $6 million salary, then the Red Sox might have a chance to both upgrade at shortstop and reduce payroll at the same time.

  1. WhenMattStairsIsKing - Dec 6, 2011 at 5:49 PM

    If I’m Pittsburgh, I go get Lowrie for 2 mid-level prospects.

  2. trotnixonisbestnixon - Dec 6, 2011 at 5:58 PM

    I can’t really see the point, unless they have a no-brainer offer from some team for Lowrie or Scutaro. Especially with Iglesias (and more importantly, Iglesias’ defense) in the wings, does it really make sense to bring in a guy that’s going to A: cost a multi-year deal along with a posting fee and B: have no guarantee of success at the Major League Level? Maybe (just a shot in the dark here) there’s something in the trade pipe with Youk, and they’re thinking of Lowrie as a 3rd basemen going into the season? Ah, screw it. I don’t know how to read this team anymore….

    • trotnixonisbestnixon - Dec 6, 2011 at 6:01 PM

      …and there goes Gordon Edes saying that they didn’t submit. Nevermind, I guess!

    • bozosforall - Dec 6, 2011 at 7:49 PM

      The posting fee should count as part of the salary dollars when calculating total team salary.

  3. bozosforall - Dec 6, 2011 at 6:36 PM

    There go the Red Sux once again, trying to buy a title…just like they have done since the early Tom Yawkey years (pre-Steinbrenner Yankee years).

  4. docktorellis - Dec 6, 2011 at 8:08 PM

    If it’s the Twins then I’m joining Trevorb and rooting for the Blue Jays this year.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Will Stanton worry about future beanings?
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. G. Stanton (3409)
  2. B. Gardner (2087)
  3. J. Hamilton (2015)
  4. B. Belt (2008)
  5. A. Rizzo (1999)
  1. D. Pedroia (1987)
  2. G. Holland (1883)
  3. C. Young (1882)
  4. R. Castillo (1778)
  5. R. Braun (1746)