Skip to content

MLB issues dress code for media members

Dec 7, 2011, 9:09 AM EDT

Male model

I suppose this applies to me too. But seriously,  this is a snakeskin jacket! And for me it’s a symbol of my individuality, and my belief … in personal freedom:

Baseball has become the first major pro league in North America to issue dress guidelines for media members, putting them in writing at the winter meetings. The no-wear list also includes visible undergarments, excessively short skirts or anything with a team logo.

“This is not in response to any single incident,” MLB spokesman Pat Courtney said Tuesday.

That sound you hear is every single baseball writer I’ve ever met breathing a sigh of relief over the fact that the dress code doesn’t prohibit pleated Dockers. That would be chaos.

Ain’t gonna lie, though: I’m probably more out of compliance than anyone. The threads are just fine, but I’ve been rocking my block-C Indians cap all week here at the Winter Meetings. It’s freezing and my bald head needs protection. I suppose it’s a bit bush league to wear MLB merchandise when I’m on the job, but it beats hypothermia.

  1. Francisco (FC) - Dec 7, 2011 at 9:15 AM

    But we’re all sure MLB included an exception clause for bathrobes and bubble pipes…

  2. umrguy42 - Dec 7, 2011 at 9:18 AM

    You need to get yourself a Toledo Mud Hens hat then. Or maybe a St. Louis Browns hat – what if it’s no longer an “active” team logo? Lots of options, Pilots, Colt .45s, Senators… :D

    • acuraf12 - Dec 7, 2011 at 9:42 AM

      Or an 80’s style Expos hat – awesome.

      • umrguy42 - Dec 7, 2011 at 9:55 AM

        I *knew* I was forgetting one! A Devil Rays hat might still be too close, though.

    • paperlions - Dec 7, 2011 at 9:59 AM

      Colt 45s changed their name because of a copyright lawsuit (or threat of one), so it is probably impossible to find a hat, unless the Colt family has endorsed it.

      • Max Power - Dec 7, 2011 at 11:16 AM

        I have a Colt .45’s hat. You can get one here:

        http://www.dugout-memories.com/coophous.html

        I’m not sure whether there’s an arrangement with the Colt firearms companies, but I do know that if Samuel Colt was still around he wouldn’t settle disputes with threats of trademark litigation.

  3. phukyouk - Dec 7, 2011 at 9:18 AM

    ” excessively short skirts”

    WHAT.THE.FUCK!

    • gammagammahey - Dec 7, 2011 at 10:51 AM

      This is in response to an unfortunate incident featuring Jon Heyman walking over a subway grate.

      • phukyouk - Dec 7, 2011 at 11:21 AM

        literally just spit Seltzer out of my nose in the middle of a meeting.. thank you! i may be joining the unemployed today but at least it got a laugh

  4. unclemosesgreen - Dec 7, 2011 at 9:22 AM

    Strange, I pictured you in the lobby with an Indiana Jones safari hat and matching bullwhip ensemble.

  5. catsmeat - Dec 7, 2011 at 9:26 AM

    Craig, considering how much you troll the Phillies fanbase, how you didn’t end up using this photograph as your stock “fashion” photo is beyond me.

  6. cmutimmah - Dec 7, 2011 at 9:27 AM

    What’s the policy on booby tassels?

  7. hammyofdoom - Dec 7, 2011 at 9:27 AM

    The fact they made sure to say this isn’t about a specific incident leads me to believe it probably is. I picture some dude in a short skirt, thong hangin’ out the back wearing a team Jersey and wandering around drunkenly in the lobby until they manage to take him down with sedative darts.

  8. beinhorntwins - Dec 7, 2011 at 9:28 AM

    good thing erin andrews doesn’t report baseball

    http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=erin+andrews&view=detail&id=0B764771F5C6D79ABAA1EE5344680964CA3D6835&first=0

    • gammagammahey - Dec 7, 2011 at 10:53 AM

      That’s not a picture of Erin Andrews.

  9. eshine76 - Dec 7, 2011 at 9:36 AM

    You better return those assless chaps…

    • paperlions - Dec 7, 2011 at 10:02 AM

      Chaps are assless by definition, leggings that also cover your ass are called pants.

      • kiwicricket - Dec 7, 2011 at 10:22 AM

        I think you might of thought about this before, PL….

      • eshine76 - Dec 7, 2011 at 10:36 AM

        I don’t own any, so I appreciate your expertise on the subject.

      • cur68 - Dec 7, 2011 at 11:04 AM

        Anyone who rides motorbikes probably has some or thinks about getting some. No one likes cold legs and a sweaty butt. Chaps are the answer. And yeah, no need for the redundant term ‘assless’. Unless you just like to type “assless”, then carry on. I don’t judge.

  10. sdelmonte - Dec 7, 2011 at 9:37 AM

    The team logos makes sense at some level. Though it’s really not anyone’s business if a blogger roots for a team. And it’s the concern of an editor and not the league if a paid (supposedly objective) reporter roots for a team.

    The other things? As a prude, I don’t like exposed underwear, etc. But that is again my opinion and not anyone else’s I might not like something, but I don’t think MLB really should have the authority to enforce clothing morality. Though I am afraid, as a private organization, they do have the right.

  11. Lukehart80 - Dec 7, 2011 at 10:05 AM

    Don’t give in Craig! SOMEONE has got to represent the Indians at these meetings, even if it’s not an actual Indians’ fan!

  12. kiwicricket - Dec 7, 2011 at 10:25 AM

    You see gentlemen….persistence is the key. A fashion related posting, and it’s tremendous.

    • pauleee - Dec 7, 2011 at 11:24 AM

      A fashion related posting, and it’s FABULOUS.

      FTFY

      • cur68 - Dec 7, 2011 at 11:39 AM

        In kiwi’s neck of the woods I think they use the term “fabbo”, FYI.

  13. kiwicricket - Dec 7, 2011 at 10:30 AM

    Slightly curious as to how Craig sought out, and decided upon the main picture in this post…..

  14. mojosmagic - Dec 7, 2011 at 10:33 AM

    Never could figure out why most writers look like got their clothes at a Goodwill finale clearance.

  15. nelsonsaint - Dec 7, 2011 at 10:35 AM

    This won’t happen, at least not in our lifetime.

    And by then, they’ll be driving Buicks to the moon.

  16. ThatGuy - Dec 7, 2011 at 10:57 AM

    Does this mean Heyman can’t wear his Scott Boras Team Jersey?

    • Utley's Hair - Dec 7, 2011 at 3:46 PM

      It’s a Mystery Team jersey with Boras’ name on the back.

  17. PanchoHerreraFanClub - Dec 7, 2011 at 1:12 PM

    Dang it. I was so looking forward to Craig in an excessively short skirt that shows off lacy panties with a Braves logo on the side.

    • Utley's Hair - Dec 7, 2011 at 3:48 PM

      Thanks…I just threw up in my mouth. Though his pasty-whiteness could very well help by blinding you before any permanent damage is suffered.

  18. docktorellis - Dec 7, 2011 at 4:53 PM

    Yes. LOVE the Wild at Heart reference. Ten points, Craig.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Who are the favorites for Rookie of the Year?
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. J. Soler (3590)
  2. Y. Molina (3378)
  3. R. Castillo (3234)
  4. D. Wright (2293)
  5. D. Murphy (2167)
  1. S. Doolittle (2124)
  2. B. Colon (2122)
  3. B. Posey (2093)
  4. D. Ortiz (2086)
  5. T. Lincecum (2023)