<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When did the Red Sox get all thrifty?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/</link>
	<description>Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:53:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: markfrednubble</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-237200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[markfrednubble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-237200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bozosforall, 

(me) “There is no objective reason for the Red Sox to look at 2012 as anything other than a great chance to win the World Series — the way they look at every season.”

(you) 2 for the last 92 only shows that your team is the epitome of FAIL.

I said they way they approach it, not the results. Some teams know that, barring an unpredictable miracle, they won&#039;t compete for the championship, so they makes the moves they can afford and hope they sell some tickets and stay in contention for a few months. The Red Sox are one of a handful of teams who sit there every winter and try to figure out how to become good enough to have a realistic shot at the World Series. For pretty much every year under the current ownership, an objective Red Sox fan could enter the season with the idea that winning it all is a realistic goal. Same for a Yankee fan. My point is that I see this offseason no differently -- they are trying to field a team that can win it all. The reason that they are not spending big on free agents is not that they&#039;ve become cheap and stopped trying to win it all, it&#039;s that they&#039;ve spent a ton in recent years, some of it badly, and they have a core of talent that is good enough and young enough that they don&#039;t need huge moves. Kepping Papelbon would have been utterly stupid at the price the Phillies paid, and Philly fans will learn this over time. Pujols, Fielder, Wilson, Buehrle, Reyes -- all huge money but none of them the right fit for Boston or NY this offseason. 

Are people saying &quot;When did the Yankees become cheap&quot; because they haven&#039;t gone hog wild for free agents this winter? Of course not. The premise is the same for the Red Sox.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bozosforall, </p>
<p>(me) “There is no objective reason for the Red Sox to look at 2012 as anything other than a great chance to win the World Series — the way they look at every season.”</p>
<p>(you) 2 for the last 92 only shows that your team is the epitome of FAIL.</p>
<p>I said they way they approach it, not the results. Some teams know that, barring an unpredictable miracle, they won&#8217;t compete for the championship, so they makes the moves they can afford and hope they sell some tickets and stay in contention for a few months. The Red Sox are one of a handful of teams who sit there every winter and try to figure out how to become good enough to have a realistic shot at the World Series. For pretty much every year under the current ownership, an objective Red Sox fan could enter the season with the idea that winning it all is a realistic goal. Same for a Yankee fan. My point is that I see this offseason no differently &#8212; they are trying to field a team that can win it all. The reason that they are not spending big on free agents is not that they&#8217;ve become cheap and stopped trying to win it all, it&#8217;s that they&#8217;ve spent a ton in recent years, some of it badly, and they have a core of talent that is good enough and young enough that they don&#8217;t need huge moves. Kepping Papelbon would have been utterly stupid at the price the Phillies paid, and Philly fans will learn this over time. Pujols, Fielder, Wilson, Buehrle, Reyes &#8212; all huge money but none of them the right fit for Boston or NY this offseason. </p>
<p>Are people saying &#8220;When did the Yankees become cheap&#8221; because they haven&#8217;t gone hog wild for free agents this winter? Of course not. The premise is the same for the Red Sox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markfrednubble</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-237161</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[markfrednubble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-237161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[church again, 

(me) A rotation of Lester, Beckett, Buchholz, Bard and maybe Aceves is very competitive and could be outstanding

(you) Bard’s career high in IP is 77. There’s almost no chance the Sox let him start and finish the season in the rotation. Aceves pitched 114IP last year, are you going to count on him for 180+? Buccholz is starting his 5th full year in the pro’s and has only 1 healthy year on his resume. That’s a lot of wishful thinking for everything to go right.

You can raise questions, for sure. The first three guys have all been all-star caliber when healthy in recent years, and none of them is old. Lost in the Beckett September crap is that he had a phenomenal year until the final weeks. We&#039;ll see. Bard was a starter in college and people seem to think he has the stuff and the arsenal to make the transition. CJ Wilson is just the latest case of many good arms who make that switch successfully. Beyond Bard and Aceves they clearly need to have rotation depth, whether it&#039;s Matsuzaka returning, Miller, whomever. My point is that this rotation could be very good and does not cry out for a high-priced free agent addition. Like the bullpen, I expect there to be a couple of signings of veteran SPs, below the marquee level, as insurance. Not because the Sox have become cheap but because that&#039;s all they need with the current roster.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>church again, </p>
<p>(me) A rotation of Lester, Beckett, Buchholz, Bard and maybe Aceves is very competitive and could be outstanding</p>
<p>(you) Bard’s career high in IP is 77. There’s almost no chance the Sox let him start and finish the season in the rotation. Aceves pitched 114IP last year, are you going to count on him for 180+? Buccholz is starting his 5th full year in the pro’s and has only 1 healthy year on his resume. That’s a lot of wishful thinking for everything to go right.</p>
<p>You can raise questions, for sure. The first three guys have all been all-star caliber when healthy in recent years, and none of them is old. Lost in the Beckett September crap is that he had a phenomenal year until the final weeks. We&#8217;ll see. Bard was a starter in college and people seem to think he has the stuff and the arsenal to make the transition. CJ Wilson is just the latest case of many good arms who make that switch successfully. Beyond Bard and Aceves they clearly need to have rotation depth, whether it&#8217;s Matsuzaka returning, Miller, whomever. My point is that this rotation could be very good and does not cry out for a high-priced free agent addition. Like the bullpen, I expect there to be a couple of signings of veteran SPs, below the marquee level, as insurance. Not because the Sox have become cheap but because that&#8217;s all they need with the current roster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markfrednubble</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-237147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[markfrednubble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-237147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In reply to church, 

The Yankees have a bunch of young guys. By &quot;aging Yankee team&quot; I am referring to core players like Jeter, ARod and Rivera. Clearly you have Cano, Granderson, Swisher, Teixeira, Gardner, Sabathia and Robertson in their primes and some good young talent on the verge. But I believe the left side of the infield will increasingly become a problem as those two keep slowing down. It is the reason the Yankees have not gone out to sign a bat for the DH role -- they need to keep that spot fairly open so Jeter and ARod can get enough days when they don&#039;t have to play the field. 

The only Red Sox core player who is in that category is Ortiz. So whatever the roster numbers compute to, the Red Sox are a younger team in terms of their core, most important players. 

None of that is to suggest the Red Sox look better than the Yankees right now. My point is that the division does not look to me like it did a few years ago, when you knew at least two teams would win about 95 or more games every year. I believe the rise of the Angels and Rangers makes the AL West no longer a weak division, and the East is not as daunting as it was a few years ago.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to church, </p>
<p>The Yankees have a bunch of young guys. By &#8220;aging Yankee team&#8221; I am referring to core players like Jeter, ARod and Rivera. Clearly you have Cano, Granderson, Swisher, Teixeira, Gardner, Sabathia and Robertson in their primes and some good young talent on the verge. But I believe the left side of the infield will increasingly become a problem as those two keep slowing down. It is the reason the Yankees have not gone out to sign a bat for the DH role &#8212; they need to keep that spot fairly open so Jeter and ARod can get enough days when they don&#8217;t have to play the field. </p>
<p>The only Red Sox core player who is in that category is Ortiz. So whatever the roster numbers compute to, the Red Sox are a younger team in terms of their core, most important players. </p>
<p>None of that is to suggest the Red Sox look better than the Yankees right now. My point is that the division does not look to me like it did a few years ago, when you knew at least two teams would win about 95 or more games every year. I believe the rise of the Angels and Rangers makes the AL West no longer a weak division, and the East is not as daunting as it was a few years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe not, Randy...but they are there if they are needed.  They have already gotten a taste of it last year and could be ready, as you say, if needed.  However, I&#039;d say that one or the other could fill the #5 spot on most teams, including the Yankees.  Not anything nearly like the Hughes/Kennedy/Joba fiasco of a couple of years ago.  Cashman could easily change his mind depending on the situation next season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe not, Randy&#8230;but they are there if they are needed.  They have already gotten a taste of it last year and could be ready, as you say, if needed.  However, I&#8217;d say that one or the other could fill the #5 spot on most teams, including the Yankees.  Not anything nearly like the Hughes/Kennedy/Joba fiasco of a couple of years ago.  Cashman could easily change his mind depending on the situation next season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fredverd</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236936</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fredverd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Yankee fan, I could not believe how day-in,day-out bad Carl Crawford was!  Maybe one year of bad Crawford is the price Sawx had to pay for trying to bury Ortiz&#039; stuff in new Yankee Stadium cement.  I will continue to cringe every time Crawford comes to the plate--knowing that he can kill you in so many ways.  I could only hope Cashman could somehow swing a trade for him after his down year...I would take him in a heartbeat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Yankee fan, I could not believe how day-in,day-out bad Carl Crawford was!  Maybe one year of bad Crawford is the price Sawx had to pay for trying to bury Ortiz&#8217; stuff in new Yankee Stadium cement.  I will continue to cringe every time Crawford comes to the plate&#8211;knowing that he can kill you in so many ways.  I could only hope Cashman could somehow swing a trade for him after his down year&#8230;I would take him in a heartbeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randygnyc</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randygnyc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bozo, I usually agree with most of what you say, but as far as the killer B&#039;s are concerned, I don&#039;t think we&#039;ll see either of them this year, at all (except as token additions in september), unless something catastrophic happens.  I think Cashman has said recently that he has no intention of bringing either up this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bozo, I usually agree with most of what you say, but as far as the killer B&#8217;s are concerned, I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ll see either of them this year, at all (except as token additions in september), unless something catastrophic happens.  I think Cashman has said recently that he has no intention of bringing either up this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randygnyc</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236829</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randygnyc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The crawford, lackey and dice K signings have essentially emasculated the red sox.  However I&#039;ll advised (in retrospect) these signings were taken for granted by the Players in their clubhouse, IMO.  It&#039;s my guess that ownership must feel, on some level, that they&#039;ve invested heavily on their payroll commitments and in return, have had their team underachieve (and that&#039;s being kind), their manager disappear (for whatever reason) the clubhouse devolved into a softer incarnation of Sodom and Gomorrah, and the general manager who decided to quit, again.

Can&#039;t blame ownership for being a little gun-shy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The crawford, lackey and dice K signings have essentially emasculated the red sox.  However I&#8217;ll advised (in retrospect) these signings were taken for granted by the Players in their clubhouse, IMO.  It&#8217;s my guess that ownership must feel, on some level, that they&#8217;ve invested heavily on their payroll commitments and in return, have had their team underachieve (and that&#8217;s being kind), their manager disappear (for whatever reason) the clubhouse devolved into a softer incarnation of Sodom and Gomorrah, and the general manager who decided to quit, again.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t blame ownership for being a little gun-shy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Yankees are building through the farm, just like last year.  And will be better than the Red Sox as a result going forward.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Yankees are building through the farm, just like last year.  And will be better than the Red Sox as a result going forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never said that it WOULD happen but after the failed experiment with Hughes/Kennedy/Joba, rest assured that the Yankees will take their good old sweet time with Banuelos and Betances.  And even if they are mediocre this year, they won&#039;t be any worse than the production that the Yankees got from Garcia and Colon.  So, even worst case scenario isn&#039;t any worse than last year...when the Yankees still won the AL East.

Meanwhile, the depleted Red Sox farm system has nothing to offer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never said that it WOULD happen but after the failed experiment with Hughes/Kennedy/Joba, rest assured that the Yankees will take their good old sweet time with Banuelos and Betances.  And even if they are mediocre this year, they won&#8217;t be any worse than the production that the Yankees got from Garcia and Colon.  So, even worst case scenario isn&#8217;t any worse than last year&#8230;when the Yankees still won the AL East.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the depleted Red Sox farm system has nothing to offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[markfrednubble

&quot;There is no objective reason for the Red Sox to look at 2012 as anything other than a great chance to win the World Series — the way they look at every season.&quot;

2 for the last 92 only shows that your team is the epitome of FAIL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>markfrednubble</p>
<p>&#8220;There is no objective reason for the Red Sox to look at 2012 as anything other than a great chance to win the World Series — the way they look at every season.&#8221;</p>
<p>2 for the last 92 only shows that your team is the epitome of FAIL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There IS a &quot;cancel reply&quot; button, doofus.  Then again, you are a mentally challeged Red Sox fan (a tautology if I&#039;ve ever seen one) so that&#039;s not surprising.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There IS a &#8220;cancel reply&#8221; button, doofus.  Then again, you are a mentally challeged Red Sox fan (a tautology if I&#8217;ve ever seen one) so that&#8217;s not surprising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cintiphil</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cintiphil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am going official here and saying that all of this stuff is for nothing. The Tigers, Angels and Rangers, are going to fight for the pennant in the AL. And, I pick the TIGERS! However, good luck to the rest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going official here and saying that all of this stuff is for nothing. The Tigers, Angels and Rangers, are going to fight for the pennant in the AL. And, I pick the TIGERS! However, good luck to the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[baseballisboring - Dec 14, 2011 at 7:26 PM 
Copying what the Yankees did? Like, low-cost acquisitions? You think the Yankees invented that?

_
Never said that they &quot;invented&quot; that...said that they were copying the Yankees&#039; latest trend.  Just like they copied the Yankees&#039; high spending in previous years.  

Face it...Boston is not a leader, only a follower.  They will always be second best to New York or LA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>baseballisboring &#8211; Dec 14, 2011 at 7:26 PM<br />
Copying what the Yankees did? Like, low-cost acquisitions? You think the Yankees invented that?</p>
<p>_<br />
Never said that they &#8220;invented&#8221; that&#8230;said that they were copying the Yankees&#8217; latest trend.  Just like they copied the Yankees&#8217; high spending in previous years.  </p>
<p>Face it&#8230;Boston is not a leader, only a follower.  They will always be second best to New York or LA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, I&#039;m talking about the organization AND the fan base.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I&#8217;m talking about the organization AND the fan base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evanwins</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evanwins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 05:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think there are a lot of people who WANT to believe what I said isn&#039;t true...the old &quot;wait and see what they do NEXT&quot; instead of looking at what they have done so far.

Is everyone&#039;s thinking that the big moves happen later in the offseason?  Cause that is really contrary to every other offseason...ever.

What was the Red Sox biggest problem last year?           (Pitching)

How have they approached fixing that?                             (Not at all; even lost a massive piece of their pitching                                                                                               puzzle and replaced it with financially controllably no one.)

We&#039;ll see...but I wouldn&#039;t hold my breath waiting for that big move...at least the one that makes this a BETTER team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are a lot of people who WANT to believe what I said isn&#8217;t true&#8230;the old &#8220;wait and see what they do NEXT&#8221; instead of looking at what they have done so far.</p>
<p>Is everyone&#8217;s thinking that the big moves happen later in the offseason?  Cause that is really contrary to every other offseason&#8230;ever.</p>
<p>What was the Red Sox biggest problem last year?           (Pitching)</p>
<p>How have they approached fixing that?                             (Not at all; even lost a massive piece of their pitching                                                                                               puzzle and replaced it with financially controllably no one.)</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see&#8230;but I wouldn&#8217;t hold my breath waiting for that big move&#8230;at least the one that makes this a BETTER team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thamel37</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236697</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thamel37]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 04:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Didn&#039;t the Red Sox just drop a ton of money last year on A.Gon and Crawford? And the have Pedroia and Youk locked up for a couple more years. They have invested heavily in the rotation with Beckett, Lester, Lackey, Buchholz, DiceK (not that the performance has been great for all). The point is the core of the team is taken care of and it has taken a lot of money to accomplish that. The money hasn&#039;t always been spent wisely which is even more cause for concern. Since the new GM doesn&#039;t want to start off on the wrong foot he could be picking his spots. 
Its not like this free agent class was great for what they need! 1B was the best position and they&#039;re set there for a long time. Who was the standout RF, SS, C? Closers are way overpaid. Look how many just blow up out of nowhere!  Maybe they are planning to start talking to Elsbury about an extension and that will take a lot of money to get done. 
The biggest issue with this article is it&#039;s ONLY DECEMBER 14TH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
Last I checked the season isn&#039;t starting tomorrow. There&#039;s still time to sign, trade, salary dump, etc. 
What have the Yankees done this year? Are they out of money/being thrifty, or are they working on trades, waiting for the trade deadline, or not impressed with whats available??? 
It looks like someone had a slow work day so someone needed to create a story.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t the Red Sox just drop a ton of money last year on A.Gon and Crawford? And the have Pedroia and Youk locked up for a couple more years. They have invested heavily in the rotation with Beckett, Lester, Lackey, Buchholz, DiceK (not that the performance has been great for all). The point is the core of the team is taken care of and it has taken a lot of money to accomplish that. The money hasn&#8217;t always been spent wisely which is even more cause for concern. Since the new GM doesn&#8217;t want to start off on the wrong foot he could be picking his spots.<br />
Its not like this free agent class was great for what they need! 1B was the best position and they&#8217;re set there for a long time. Who was the standout RF, SS, C? Closers are way overpaid. Look how many just blow up out of nowhere!  Maybe they are planning to start talking to Elsbury about an extension and that will take a lot of money to get done.<br />
The biggest issue with this article is it&#8217;s ONLY DECEMBER 14TH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br />
Last I checked the season isn&#8217;t starting tomorrow. There&#8217;s still time to sign, trade, salary dump, etc.<br />
What have the Yankees done this year? Are they out of money/being thrifty, or are they working on trades, waiting for the trade deadline, or not impressed with whats available???<br />
It looks like someone had a slow work day so someone needed to create a story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236690</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 03:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;A rotation of Lester, Beckett, Buchholz, Bard and maybe Aceves is very competitive and could be outstanding&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Bard&#039;s career high in IP is 77.  There&#039;s almost no chance the Sox let him start and finish the season in the rotation.  Aceves pitched 114IP last year, are you going to count on him for 180+?  Buccholz is starting his 5th full year in the pro&#039;s and has only 1 healthy year on his resume.  That&#039;s a lot of wishful thinking for everything to go right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A rotation of Lester, Beckett, Buchholz, Bard and maybe Aceves is very competitive and could be outstanding</p></blockquote>
<p>Bard&#8217;s career high in IP is 77.  There&#8217;s almost no chance the Sox let him start and finish the season in the rotation.  Aceves pitched 114IP last year, are you going to count on him for 180+?  Buccholz is starting his 5th full year in the pro&#8217;s and has only 1 healthy year on his resume.  That&#8217;s a lot of wishful thinking for everything to go right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 03:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt; I see an aging Yankee team that will have trouble repeating the Colon/Garcia/Nova results of last year&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Average Ages:

Starting Lineup
Yankees - 29.7
Red Sox - 29.3

Pitching
Yankees - 29.7
ReD Sox - 28.4

As presently constituted, there really isn&#039;t a difference. Why people seem to think the Yankees have zero young guys is beyond me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> I see an aging Yankee team that will have trouble repeating the Colon/Garcia/Nova results of last year</p></blockquote>
<p>Average Ages:</p>
<p>Starting Lineup<br />
Yankees &#8211; 29.7<br />
Red Sox &#8211; 29.3</p>
<p>Pitching<br />
Yankees &#8211; 29.7<br />
ReD Sox &#8211; 28.4</p>
<p>As presently constituted, there really isn&#8217;t a difference. Why people seem to think the Yankees have zero young guys is beyond me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markfrednubble</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[markfrednubble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 02:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[evanwins, I think you could hardly be more wrong about the Red Sox&#039; approach and their 2012 prospects. 

Your first mistake is assuming the offseason is over and they are going with Melancon as their closer. I highly doubt he will be their closer when the season opens. They are in the opportunistic position of letting the market settle down now that the teams who like to spend big money all have their closers. I&#039;ll bet the price of a guy like Madson will fall to the point of the Red Sox signing him for less than he has been seeking. 

The rest of the team is deep and talented. They still need more arms in the bullpen and another RH bat to play some games in RF. A rotation of Lester, Beckett, Buchholz, Bard and maybe Aceves is very competitive and could be outstanding. The offense will again be among the best in the league. Crawford has to be closer to his Rays level than what we saw in his first year in Boston. 

They are tweaking instead of making big moves because that&#039;s what this roster needs. They are obviously hoping the new manager and coaching staff have a major role in fixing whatever dysfunctional elements (beyond injuries) that led to their collapse. 

When I look at the AL East, I see an aging Yankee team that will have trouble repeating the Colon/Garcia/Nova results of last year, a Tampa team rich in pitching that may not be able to win 90 games with that offense, and an improving Toronto team that could be the dark horse. There is no objective reason for the Red Sox to look at 2012 as anything other than a great chance to win the World Series -- the way they look at every season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>evanwins, I think you could hardly be more wrong about the Red Sox&#8217; approach and their 2012 prospects. </p>
<p>Your first mistake is assuming the offseason is over and they are going with Melancon as their closer. I highly doubt he will be their closer when the season opens. They are in the opportunistic position of letting the market settle down now that the teams who like to spend big money all have their closers. I&#8217;ll bet the price of a guy like Madson will fall to the point of the Red Sox signing him for less than he has been seeking. </p>
<p>The rest of the team is deep and talented. They still need more arms in the bullpen and another RH bat to play some games in RF. A rotation of Lester, Beckett, Buchholz, Bard and maybe Aceves is very competitive and could be outstanding. The offense will again be among the best in the league. Crawford has to be closer to his Rays level than what we saw in his first year in Boston. </p>
<p>They are tweaking instead of making big moves because that&#8217;s what this roster needs. They are obviously hoping the new manager and coaching staff have a major role in fixing whatever dysfunctional elements (beyond injuries) that led to their collapse. </p>
<p>When I look at the AL East, I see an aging Yankee team that will have trouble repeating the Colon/Garcia/Nova results of last year, a Tampa team rich in pitching that may not be able to win 90 games with that offense, and an improving Toronto team that could be the dark horse. There is no objective reason for the Red Sox to look at 2012 as anything other than a great chance to win the World Series &#8212; the way they look at every season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojosmagic</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mojosmagic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Uyf, hardly a cheap organization. Bottom line is the Red Sox are at or near their spending limit and need to keep a small reserve for the mid season trade deadline.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Uyf, hardly a cheap organization. Bottom line is the Red Sox are at or near their spending limit and need to keep a small reserve for the mid season trade deadline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmcgly</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cmcgly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[speaking of assumptions, you are assuming that the yankees much hyped &quot;killer b&#039;s&quot; are going to live up to the enormous expectations that yankee fans have of them. Which, news flash, does not always happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speaking of assumptions, you are assuming that the yankees much hyped &#8220;killer b&#8217;s&#8221; are going to live up to the enormous expectations that yankee fans have of them. Which, news flash, does not always happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baseballisboring</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[baseballisboring]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is everyone assuming they&#039;re done making moves on December 14th? I wouldn&#039;t assume Melancon is our closer yet. I think as it stands, having Buchholz back healthy and taking Dice K and Lackey out of the rotation is, yes, an upgrade. I don&#039;t want a 6.00 ERA in the rotation just cause they have a recognizable name. There&#039;s still all sorts of options out there...Darvish, Kuroda, Jackson to bolster the rotation, I think they end up signing one of them, but I don&#039;t know what their game plan is. Neither does anyone else. They haven&#039;t even *attempted* to fill the holes they had? What have they been doing in the front office this whole time then, playing Words With Friends? 

And let&#039;s not forget, one bad month took them from 10 games up to one game out of the playoffs. What do you think is more indicative of their talent level, the first five months or the last one? Their roster isn&#039;t constructed yet. It&#039;s not fair to assume that they&#039;re gonna take a step back, OR take a step forward, or anything. I&#039;m just saying, they don&#039;t have *that* many holes. Fix the back end of the rotation and it&#039;s at least a 90 win team again. That doesn&#039;t guarantee them anything in the AL East, I&#039;m aware of that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is everyone assuming they&#8217;re done making moves on December 14th? I wouldn&#8217;t assume Melancon is our closer yet. I think as it stands, having Buchholz back healthy and taking Dice K and Lackey out of the rotation is, yes, an upgrade. I don&#8217;t want a 6.00 ERA in the rotation just cause they have a recognizable name. There&#8217;s still all sorts of options out there&#8230;Darvish, Kuroda, Jackson to bolster the rotation, I think they end up signing one of them, but I don&#8217;t know what their game plan is. Neither does anyone else. They haven&#8217;t even *attempted* to fill the holes they had? What have they been doing in the front office this whole time then, playing Words With Friends? </p>
<p>And let&#8217;s not forget, one bad month took them from 10 games up to one game out of the playoffs. What do you think is more indicative of their talent level, the first five months or the last one? Their roster isn&#8217;t constructed yet. It&#8217;s not fair to assume that they&#8217;re gonna take a step back, OR take a step forward, or anything. I&#8217;m just saying, they don&#8217;t have *that* many holes. Fix the back end of the rotation and it&#8217;s at least a 90 win team again. That doesn&#8217;t guarantee them anything in the AL East, I&#8217;m aware of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uyf1950</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[uyf1950]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[baseballsboring - I think you can certainly add Larry Lucchino to that list.  He certainly represents the &quot;organization&quot;.  And after all it was him that coined the phase &quot;evil empire&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>baseballsboring &#8211; I think you can certainly add Larry Lucchino to that list.  He certainly represents the &#8220;organization&#8221;.  And after all it was him that coined the phase &#8220;evil empire&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a major league source, the Red Sox expect to exceed the $178 million payroll threshold that would trigger luxury tax payments for the 2012 season.

http://fullcount.weei.com/sports/boston/baseball/red-sox/2011/12/13/source-red-sox-expect-to-go-over-luxury-tax-threshold/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a major league source, the Red Sox expect to exceed the $178 million payroll threshold that would trigger luxury tax payments for the 2012 season.</p>
<p><a href="http://fullcount.weei.com/sports/boston/baseball/red-sox/2011/12/13/source-red-sox-expect-to-go-over-luxury-tax-threshold/" rel="nofollow">http://fullcount.weei.com/sports/boston/baseball/red-sox/2011/12/13/source-red-sox-expect-to-go-over-luxury-tax-threshold/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Except that instead of old Posada, we get young Montero
Instead of old Colon, we get young Banuelos or Betances (or both)
Instead of old Chavez, we get young Nunez

ALL who are just going to get better with experience.

Meanwhile, the depleted Red Sox farm system has nothing to offer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that instead of old Posada, we get young Montero<br />
Instead of old Colon, we get young Banuelos or Betances (or both)<br />
Instead of old Chavez, we get young Nunez</p>
<p>ALL who are just going to get better with experience.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the depleted Red Sox farm system has nothing to offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evanwins</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evanwins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are not taking into account what they have lost when you say that &quot;they&#039;re core is in place&quot;  Every piece that left was replaced with the absolute lowest cost alternative.

They replaced Papelbon with Melancon when they could have replaced him with Madson.  Think about that.

They have made no attempt to fill ANY of the wholes they had last year (starting pitching, relief pitching, outfield).

If you think they are not taking a step back, you are crazy.

And by the way, they will be WAY MORE THAN ONE GMAE OUT OF THE PLAYOFFS THIS YEAR.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are not taking into account what they have lost when you say that &#8220;they&#8217;re core is in place&#8221;  Every piece that left was replaced with the absolute lowest cost alternative.</p>
<p>They replaced Papelbon with Melancon when they could have replaced him with Madson.  Think about that.</p>
<p>They have made no attempt to fill ANY of the wholes they had last year (starting pitching, relief pitching, outfield).</p>
<p>If you think they are not taking a step back, you are crazy.</p>
<p>And by the way, they will be WAY MORE THAN ONE GMAE OUT OF THE PLAYOFFS THIS YEAR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to admit though, that the Sox are well behind their roster from last year.  Papelon/Bard &gt; Melancon/Bard, you lost 2/5 of the rotation to TJ surgery, wakefield might be gone, who knows what you&#039;ll get from Buchholz and/or Youk leaving Andrew Miller as your possible 3rd starter.

However, no way Crawford is that bad again right?  Does Ellsbury put up another MVP worthy season?  There are a lot of questions with this team and unless everything goes their way, they won&#039;t finish a game behind the Rays this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to admit though, that the Sox are well behind their roster from last year.  Papelon/Bard &gt; Melancon/Bard, you lost 2/5 of the rotation to TJ surgery, wakefield might be gone, who knows what you&#8217;ll get from Buchholz and/or Youk leaving Andrew Miller as your possible 3rd starter.</p>
<p>However, no way Crawford is that bad again right?  Does Ellsbury put up another MVP worthy season?  There are a lot of questions with this team and unless everything goes their way, they won&#8217;t finish a game behind the Rays this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baseballisboring</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[baseballisboring]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh yeah by the way, everyone on the Yankees roster will be a year older too. That&#039;s how time works in most cases.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah by the way, everyone on the Yankees roster will be a year older too. That&#8217;s how time works in most cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baseballisboring</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[baseballisboring]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re talking about certain Red Sox fans, not the organization.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re talking about certain Red Sox fans, not the organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proudlycanadian</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/14/when-did-the-red-sox-get-all-thrifty/comment-page-1/#comment-236627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[proudlycanadian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbchardballtalk.wordpress.com/?p=103293#comment-236627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was also thinking of Boston&#039;s attempt to hire Toronto&#039;s manager even though he had a contract with the Jays.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was also thinking of Boston&#8217;s attempt to hire Toronto&#8217;s manager even though he had a contract with the Jays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
