Dec 20, 2011, 10:47 AM EST
It’s unclear how far along the two sides are in talks, but Ken Rosenthal of FOXSports.com, Steve Henson of Yahoo! Sports, and Derrick Goold of the St. Louis Post Dispatch have each reported recently that the Cardinals are interested in Coco Crisp.
Allen Craig is likely to miss at least the first month of the season following knee surgery, which would allow Crisp to play center field every day while Jon Jay shifts to right field. And once Craig returns manager Mike Matheny would have to platoon him mostly versus left-handers or bench one of Crisp or Jay.
Crisp in center field and Jay in right field would give the Cardinals’ outfield defense a huge boost compared to having Jay in center field and Lance Berkman in right field this past season, but Crisp hit just .264 with a .693 OPS in 136 games for the A’s and has topped a .750 OPS just twice in the past six seasons.
And with a .314 on-base percentage in 2011 as part of a .330 career mark Crisp isn’t a particularly strong fit as a leadoff man, but there’s speculation that the Cardinals would bat him atop the lineup.
- Hector Olivera’s camp denies any damage to ulnar collateral ligament 3
- UPDATE: Hunter Pence out 6-8 weeks with fracture in left forearm 25
- MLBPA: leaks are from people “who want to see Josh Hamilton hurt personally and professionally” 26
- Suspending Josh Hamilton for a year would be obscene 145
- Report: MLB panel split on rehab for Josh Hamilton; one-year suspension is in play 45
- Joc Pederson goes 2-for-2 in Cactus League debut 6
- Braves scratch Mike Minor from start with more shoulder problems 6
- Daniel Murphy on Billy Bean: “I do disagree with the fact that Billy is a homosexual” 374
- Daniel Murphy on Billy Bean: “I do disagree with the fact that Billy is a homosexual” (374)
- Suspending Josh Hamilton for a year would be obscene (145)
- Curt Schilling lowers the boom on some men tweeting threats against his daughter (137)
- That facts of Josh Hamilton’s case should not be a matter of public record (94)
- Billy Bean responds to Daniel Murphy’s comments (90)