<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rangers sign Yu Darvish to six-year, $60 million deal, bringing total investment to $112 million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/</link>
	<description>Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:59:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1943mrmojorisin1971</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1943mrmojorisin1971]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a sunk cost. You&#039;re not paying that posting fee every year, it was a one-time thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a sunk cost. You&#8217;re not paying that posting fee every year, it was a one-time thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillyphreak</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phillyphreak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edit: over $111 million]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edit: over $111 million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillyphreak</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phillyphreak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1) I conceded that the total investment was over $11 million.  The Rangers evaluated the situation in a much better way than you, I or anyone outside of the organization could to see if they could afford the posting fee.  You&#039;re free to evaluate him based on 18/year if you wish.  I&#039;ve seen it both ways.  Importantly, without the attitude you used.

2) Darvish sees $0,000,000 of the posting fee.  He sees ~$10 million a year.  The Rangers negotiated a salary with him after they submitted the posting fee.  Plus the posting fee is paid upfront so the Rangers only pay Darvish $10 million a year...again.  (See point 1- I understand that this is not the total investment).   

3) As Dave Cameron pointed out today over at FanGraphs (by the way, djpostl, he agrees with how you describe it), that Darvish will only have to be about as good as Jake Peavy to earn the total value (in terms of $/WAR).  Scouts (i.e. Keith Law) have said he could be a true 1 or at the least a 2 - if this is true than he will be considered a good investment.  

The bottom line is we can throw all sorts of numbers and values out there, but until we see how he pitches throughout the contract only then will we be able to see if it was a good move.  The Rangers seemed to think so. Why should we pretend that we are smarter?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) I conceded that the total investment was over $11 million.  The Rangers evaluated the situation in a much better way than you, I or anyone outside of the organization could to see if they could afford the posting fee.  You&#8217;re free to evaluate him based on 18/year if you wish.  I&#8217;ve seen it both ways.  Importantly, without the attitude you used.</p>
<p>2) Darvish sees $0,000,000 of the posting fee.  He sees ~$10 million a year.  The Rangers negotiated a salary with him after they submitted the posting fee.  Plus the posting fee is paid upfront so the Rangers only pay Darvish $10 million a year&#8230;again.  (See point 1- I understand that this is not the total investment).   </p>
<p>3) As Dave Cameron pointed out today over at FanGraphs (by the way, djpostl, he agrees with how you describe it), that Darvish will only have to be about as good as Jake Peavy to earn the total value (in terms of $/WAR).  Scouts (i.e. Keith Law) have said he could be a true 1 or at the least a 2 &#8211; if this is true than he will be considered a good investment.  </p>
<p>The bottom line is we can throw all sorts of numbers and values out there, but until we see how he pitches throughout the contract only then will we be able to see if it was a good move.  The Rangers seemed to think so. Why should we pretend that we are smarter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djpostl</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[djpostl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We don&#039;t care what kind of voodoo economics you want to spin for &quot;his salary is just ten per year&quot;.

They paid 11 mil and they have him for 6 years. That means his true cost is 18 per year. 

You want to spin some bullshit go into politics or work on wall street.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t care what kind of voodoo economics you want to spin for &#8220;his salary is just ten per year&#8221;.</p>
<p>They paid 11 mil and they have him for 6 years. That means his true cost is 18 per year. </p>
<p>You want to spin some bullshit go into politics or work on wall street.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djpostl</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249511</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[djpostl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um, yeah he will get Lee money. Because he is nearly as damn good (a slight soph slump in 2009 but otherwise just as good...inc postseason 2008) and more importantly he&#039;ll be a half decade younger than Lee was on his big payday when it comes time to sign.

The big reason why Yu got  the Rangers to spend 111 mil on him was because he is both talented AND young. Teams see that combo in a starter (let alone one who has shined on the big stage like Hamels did in 2008) and they open their wallets big time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, yeah he will get Lee money. Because he is nearly as damn good (a slight soph slump in 2009 but otherwise just as good&#8230;inc postseason 2008) and more importantly he&#8217;ll be a half decade younger than Lee was on his big payday when it comes time to sign.</p>
<p>The big reason why Yu got  the Rangers to spend 111 mil on him was because he is both talented AND young. Teams see that combo in a starter (let alone one who has shined on the big stage like Hamels did in 2008) and they open their wallets big time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djpostl</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[djpostl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If by spanking for two years you mean in the ALCS in 2010 and then going 2-5 versus them last year then yes, you are right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If by spanking for two years you mean in the ALCS in 2010 and then going 2-5 versus them last year then yes, you are right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djpostl</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[djpostl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Except you ain&#039;t paying ten per year. That posting fee wasn&#039;t donated by the Easter Bunny, the Rangers DID have to pay it. So 6 years at 111 million and change. More like 18 per year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except you ain&#8217;t paying ten per year. That posting fee wasn&#8217;t donated by the Easter Bunny, the Rangers DID have to pay it. So 6 years at 111 million and change. More like 18 per year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djpostl</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249506</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[djpostl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep in mind almost all of the Rangers roster is entering either arbitration years or the point where they are due huge FA paydays. That payroll is going to reach Phillies territory in the next couple of years. They will have money to spend, but the issue is how they spend it (avoiding luxury tax rates etc...)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind almost all of the Rangers roster is entering either arbitration years or the point where they are due huge FA paydays. That payroll is going to reach Phillies territory in the next couple of years. They will have money to spend, but the issue is how they spend it (avoiding luxury tax rates etc&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djpostl</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[djpostl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lol. How many AL Pitchers had an ERA around 3 last year? Not many. This guy will be along the lines of Nova last year. 16 wins and a mid to high threes ERA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol. How many AL Pitchers had an ERA around 3 last year? Not many. This guy will be along the lines of Nova last year. 16 wins and a mid to high threes ERA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djpostl</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[djpostl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lol 10 per year huh? Guess we find another team that doesn&#039;t count the posting fee in the mix. Try almost 19 per year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol 10 per year huh? Guess we find another team that doesn&#8217;t count the posting fee in the mix. Try almost 19 per year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rexryanisablowhard</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-2/#comment-249502</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rexryanisablowhard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The luxury tax threshold for MLB teams in 2011 was $178M and the Rangers salary was just north of $92M, so unless they upped their obligations by $80M (not even close) this offseason, they are not even close to being right up against it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The luxury tax threshold for MLB teams in 2011 was $178M and the Rangers salary was just north of $92M, so unless they upped their obligations by $80M (not even close) this offseason, they are not even close to being right up against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wlubake</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wlubake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason the farm system in stacked is because Daniels and Levine know their stuff. If they think signing Darvish, after scouting him for 2 years in Japan, is a better move than (1) trading for some decent young starter or (2) resigning CJ, I believe they&#039;ve earned the benefit of the doubt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason the farm system in stacked is because Daniels and Levine know their stuff. If they think signing Darvish, after scouting him for 2 years in Japan, is a better move than (1) trading for some decent young starter or (2) resigning CJ, I believe they&#8217;ve earned the benefit of the doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gamera the Brave</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gamera the Brave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who does Hamels think he is?  Barry Zito?!?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who does Hamels think he is?  Barry Zito?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatthehellisansky</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whatthehellisansky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hes in his prime, hes a lefty, and hes won a world series MVP. Oh, btw he had a great year last year.

He just got $15m in ARBITRATION.

Barring injury or a total crash n burn season, He will get at least $20m/year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hes in his prime, hes a lefty, and hes won a world series MVP. Oh, btw he had a great year last year.</p>
<p>He just got $15m in ARBITRATION.</p>
<p>Barring injury or a total crash n burn season, He will get at least $20m/year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tcostant</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-2/#comment-249336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tcostant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just want to point out since your talking about TOTAL money.  The posting fee is NOT part of the calulation for the &quot;tax&quot; that goes to the lower level teams.  Texas is right up agaist it or maybe even over it, so this real money saved vs. signing a CJ Wilson.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just want to point out since your talking about TOTAL money.  The posting fee is NOT part of the calulation for the &#8220;tax&#8221; that goes to the lower level teams.  Texas is right up agaist it or maybe even over it, so this real money saved vs. signing a CJ Wilson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: APBA Guy</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APBA Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 05:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is certainly a point to be made about the sample size, but in this case it isn&#039;t a sample: it is the universe of Japanese bred starting pitching competing in MLB that Darvish is joining. As for superstars that you reference, I assume you mean superstars in Japan? Wouldn&#039;t Matsuzake and Irabu qualify as well?

And that&#039;s part of the point that these commenters are making. The value of this pitching translating into MLB WAR or ERA + is questionable so far, that&#039;s the claim. Agreed that there is no representational data presented to support that claim other than ERA.

But regardless of that, the point is that even against the standard of great pitching stats in Japan, Darvish&#039;s record there is significantly better than the others who&#039;ve made the leap to MLB. 

But as far as whether the average value of pitchers from Japan has or has not exceeded MLB or another nationalities average, I don&#039;t have data on that. My claim was merely that commenters are making that statement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is certainly a point to be made about the sample size, but in this case it isn&#8217;t a sample: it is the universe of Japanese bred starting pitching competing in MLB that Darvish is joining. As for superstars that you reference, I assume you mean superstars in Japan? Wouldn&#8217;t Matsuzake and Irabu qualify as well?</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s part of the point that these commenters are making. The value of this pitching translating into MLB WAR or ERA + is questionable so far, that&#8217;s the claim. Agreed that there is no representational data presented to support that claim other than ERA.</p>
<p>But regardless of that, the point is that even against the standard of great pitching stats in Japan, Darvish&#8217;s record there is significantly better than the others who&#8217;ve made the leap to MLB. </p>
<p>But as far as whether the average value of pitchers from Japan has or has not exceeded MLB or another nationalities average, I don&#8217;t have data on that. My claim was merely that commenters are making that statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reflex</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reflex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have difficulty with the idea that the track record has not been that great with Japanese players.  The reality is that the sample size is very small, and I&#039;d say that on average they do better than your average &#039;american&#039; grown player.  We&#039;ve had what, maybe a couple dozen total pitchers, and they all tend to come here already &#039;old&#039; by US standards for a rookie due to their contact situation in Japan.  Who&#039;s to say what their careers would have looked like if they&#039;d come here in their early to mid 20&#039;s on average.

Despite that, I count two superstar pitchers among them(Nomo and Sasaki) and numerous very good to borderline stars.  By comparison, look at how many americans come and go on rosters in any given period of time, I guarantee you that it produces far fewer solid regulars against the total number of players, much less superstars than you see out of the Japan leagues.

A large part of this is of course that US teams get to cherry pick the Japanese players they want, taking only the cream of the crop.  But at the same time I have to wonder how many more would rise if there was a level of competition above the league that they play in now that they could move to as soon as their skills merited it.

As for Yu, he&#039;s got a good shot not just because of his skillset, but becacuse he&#039;s 25.  He&#039;s going to be one of the youngest guys to ever get a shot at having a career here, starting maybe one or two years after the typical star rookie would.  I&#039;m looking forward to seeing if he&#039;s up to it, it would be nice to see someone eclipse Nomo&#039;s stature in the US, maybe even throw a couple no-no&#039;s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have difficulty with the idea that the track record has not been that great with Japanese players.  The reality is that the sample size is very small, and I&#8217;d say that on average they do better than your average &#8216;american&#8217; grown player.  We&#8217;ve had what, maybe a couple dozen total pitchers, and they all tend to come here already &#8216;old&#8217; by US standards for a rookie due to their contact situation in Japan.  Who&#8217;s to say what their careers would have looked like if they&#8217;d come here in their early to mid 20&#8242;s on average.</p>
<p>Despite that, I count two superstar pitchers among them(Nomo and Sasaki) and numerous very good to borderline stars.  By comparison, look at how many americans come and go on rosters in any given period of time, I guarantee you that it produces far fewer solid regulars against the total number of players, much less superstars than you see out of the Japan leagues.</p>
<p>A large part of this is of course that US teams get to cherry pick the Japanese players they want, taking only the cream of the crop.  But at the same time I have to wonder how many more would rise if there was a level of competition above the league that they play in now that they could move to as soon as their skills merited it.</p>
<p>As for Yu, he&#8217;s got a good shot not just because of his skillset, but becacuse he&#8217;s 25.  He&#8217;s going to be one of the youngest guys to ever get a shot at having a career here, starting maybe one or two years after the typical star rookie would.  I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing if he&#8217;s up to it, it would be nice to see someone eclipse Nomo&#8217;s stature in the US, maybe even throw a couple no-no&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is increased cost and increased risk...increased cost because $51M paid now is worth more that $51M paid over 6 years....increased risk because he does have a lot of adjustments to make coming over to the US and adjusting to how ML teams operate, and the better competition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is increased cost and increased risk&#8230;increased cost because $51M paid now is worth more that $51M paid over 6 years&#8230;.increased risk because he does have a lot of adjustments to make coming over to the US and adjusting to how ML teams operate, and the better competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brannon521</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brannon521]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It actually is less of a risk than other 6 year deals because the $52M was for the bid so it doesn&#039;t go towards the payroll. Only the $60M does. It actually was outside the operating cost from the two billionaire owners. Also, baseball is all guaranteed money so there is no increased risk with up front money.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It actually is less of a risk than other 6 year deals because the $52M was for the bid so it doesn&#8217;t go towards the payroll. Only the $60M does. It actually was outside the operating cost from the two billionaire owners. Also, baseball is all guaranteed money so there is no increased risk with up front money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angrycorgi</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[angrycorgi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buy a title?? The rangers have been spanking the yankees for the past two years without spending much at all.  The spend on ONE player theyve been scouting for two frickingyears and they ar trying o buy a title?? You yankee fans are really bright.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buy a title?? The rangers have been spanking the yankees for the past two years without spending much at all.  The spend on ONE player theyve been scouting for two frickingyears and they ar trying o buy a title?? You yankee fans are really bright&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rexryanisablowhard</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rexryanisablowhard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Hamels duplicates or improves on 2011, he will certainly get $20M+ a year for 5 or 6 years from some team.  There will be a new Dodger owner by then looking to win, so I&#039;m sure things will heat up with them back in the fray.  Hamels, Cain, and Greinke will all be under 30 and free agents next winter, and joining them in the over 30 crowd will be Haren and Shields, look out!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Hamels duplicates or improves on 2011, he will certainly get $20M+ a year for 5 or 6 years from some team.  There will be a new Dodger owner by then looking to win, so I&#8217;m sure things will heat up with them back in the fray.  Hamels, Cain, and Greinke will all be under 30 and free agents next winter, and joining them in the over 30 crowd will be Haren and Shields, look out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rexryanisablowhard</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rexryanisablowhard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s just my opinion, no need to get all agro.  I could care less about the Angels or CJ, or any of the other nonsense you speak of.  Wilson&#039;s 2 years as a starter are impressive enough to warrant his new contract, especially since his numbers will probably improve pitching as #2 or #3 starter and going from the #1 hitters park in Arlington to the #27 in Anaheim.  Regardless of whatever Darvish accomplished in Japan, until he&#039;s proves himself in America, he&#039;s a big risk at those dollars.  If the Ranger system is so stacked, and considering all the big young arms moved this offseason, the Rangers might have been better served making a trade and using the Yu dollars to sign a Fielder.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just my opinion, no need to get all agro.  I could care less about the Angels or CJ, or any of the other nonsense you speak of.  Wilson&#8217;s 2 years as a starter are impressive enough to warrant his new contract, especially since his numbers will probably improve pitching as #2 or #3 starter and going from the #1 hitters park in Arlington to the #27 in Anaheim.  Regardless of whatever Darvish accomplished in Japan, until he&#8217;s proves himself in America, he&#8217;s a big risk at those dollars.  If the Ranger system is so stacked, and considering all the big young arms moved this offseason, the Rangers might have been better served making a trade and using the Yu dollars to sign a Fielder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: APBA Guy</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APBA Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having lived in San Antonio, I don&#039;t know if the Houston area will ever adopt the Dallas team, but Dallas is plenty big on its own to handle the payroll implications of the Darvish signing.

This deal has risk. A lot of commenters have pointed out that Darvish has never thrown in the majors, and the success rate of Japanese baseball bred starting pitching in MLB isn&#039;t great.

But financially, the Rangers are only on the hook going forward for $10M per year. Which means that should they want to move him 3 years from now, it won&#039;t be impossible. 

And if he is the exception and starts pitching very well anytime soon, the total expenditure will have been worth it.

But the main thing is that the Rangers projected him as potentially the top starter they needed to get over the World Series hump. And they got their man. 

Now we play the games. Have to like the way the rivalry between LAA and TEX is shaping up. I&#039;m looking forward to seeing Pujols against Darvish, and Hamilton against CJ Wilson in September.

It&#039;s certainly gonna beat my steady diet of the A&#039;s trotting out Pitcher X from Sacramento to face Seattle&#039;s number 8 hitter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having lived in San Antonio, I don&#8217;t know if the Houston area will ever adopt the Dallas team, but Dallas is plenty big on its own to handle the payroll implications of the Darvish signing.</p>
<p>This deal has risk. A lot of commenters have pointed out that Darvish has never thrown in the majors, and the success rate of Japanese baseball bred starting pitching in MLB isn&#8217;t great.</p>
<p>But financially, the Rangers are only on the hook going forward for $10M per year. Which means that should they want to move him 3 years from now, it won&#8217;t be impossible. </p>
<p>And if he is the exception and starts pitching very well anytime soon, the total expenditure will have been worth it.</p>
<p>But the main thing is that the Rangers projected him as potentially the top starter they needed to get over the World Series hump. And they got their man. </p>
<p>Now we play the games. Have to like the way the rivalry between LAA and TEX is shaping up. I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing Pujols against Darvish, and Hamilton against CJ Wilson in September.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s certainly gonna beat my steady diet of the A&#8217;s trotting out Pitcher X from Sacramento to face Seattle&#8217;s number 8 hitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillyphreak</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phillyphreak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The salary is still $10 million per year.  The Rangers just paid 51.7 million up front and, as FC pointed out above, that amount doesn&#039;t count towards the Luxury Tax.  So despite the fact that the total investment was over $110 million, Darvish only sees $10 mil/year.  To evaluate the deal at its end, I think we have to evaluate it in the context of amount/year for the player.  The team already decided it could afford the posting fee.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The salary is still $10 million per year.  The Rangers just paid 51.7 million up front and, as FC pointed out above, that amount doesn&#8217;t count towards the Luxury Tax.  So despite the fact that the total investment was over $110 million, Darvish only sees $10 mil/year.  To evaluate the deal at its end, I think we have to evaluate it in the context of amount/year for the player.  The team already decided it could afford the posting fee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...and it really doesn&#039;t even matter what Amaro thinks, if the owner won&#039;t open up the vault to pay him.  If Amaro does have mind powers, it is getting the owner to approve some of his negotiated contracts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and it really doesn&#8217;t even matter what Amaro thinks, if the owner won&#8217;t open up the vault to pay him.  If Amaro does have mind powers, it is getting the owner to approve some of his negotiated contracts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think this deal has any effect whatsoever on Hamels....in general, they just don&#039;t (ask Fielder, every elite player is a market unto himself, with dynamics quite different from more easily replaced players)....the biggest effect is that we know for sure that the Rangers won&#039;t be bidding on him.  Especially with the new luxury tax rules, there is only so much money to go around...every dollar spent is one less available for to be spent on future FAs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this deal has any effect whatsoever on Hamels&#8230;.in general, they just don&#8217;t (ask Fielder, every elite player is a market unto himself, with dynamics quite different from more easily replaced players)&#8230;.the biggest effect is that we know for sure that the Rangers won&#8217;t be bidding on him.  Especially with the new luxury tax rules, there is only so much money to go around&#8230;every dollar spent is one less available for to be spent on future FAs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thekingdave</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thekingdave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@miketreedy

Expanding fan base = front runners who were Astro fans 5 years ago]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@miketreedy</p>
<p>Expanding fan base = front runners who were Astro fans 5 years ago</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s him.  I think that was sarcasm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s him.  I think that was sarcasm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: illcomm</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[illcomm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And the one on Hamels getting 132 over 6.  Well that&#039;s close.  My guess is more like 4 for 88 with option 22 mil.  So close.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the one on Hamels getting 132 over 6.  Well that&#8217;s close.  My guess is more like 4 for 88 with option 22 mil.  So close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stlouis1baseball</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/18/rangers-sign-yu-darvish-to-six-year-60-million-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-249204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stlouis1baseball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=107105#comment-249204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You guys are killin&#039; it!  Hahaha!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are killin&#8217; it!  Hahaha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
