<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your morning Ryan Braun roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/</link>
	<description>Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 04:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwbiii</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-264301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jwbiii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-264301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And yet the sole dissenting vote on the arbitration panel came from MLB VP Rob Manfred. He was the only member of the panel whose vote Selig could influence.
 
Seems like you&#039;ve got something other than a functioning brain between your ears.
 
Just saying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yet the sole dissenting vote on the arbitration panel came from MLB VP Rob Manfred. He was the only member of the panel whose vote Selig could influence.</p>
<p>Seems like you&#8217;ve got something other than a functioning brain between your ears.</p>
<p>Just saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koufaxmitzvah</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-264179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[koufaxmitzvah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-264179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly, El Bravo. This is a completely imperfect system that will do nothing but drag people through the mud.

The can of worms of squishy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, El Bravo. This is a completely imperfect system that will do nothing but drag people through the mud.</p>
<p>The can of worms of squishy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navel gazing</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-264138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[navel gazing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-264138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This, exactly.  This should never have seen the light of day, as the process is supposed to play out before anything is made public.  No one can be proven innocent here.  El Bravo is right, and where they should be looking is after the leak, who caused the PR insanity for everyone involved.  If they find a way to inhibit people&#039;s willingness to share this information, they will have spent their time and money well.

The process was well defined.  Someone found the test didn&#039;t follow the process.  I love that so many people feel they  are so educated that they feel they are MORE informed than the person employed by 2 incredibly powerful organizations, with opposing viewpoints, who they presented information to make an informed decision.

Can we please just talk about PFP and other related nonsense now?  I think the press is 900X more outraged than the general public.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This, exactly.  This should never have seen the light of day, as the process is supposed to play out before anything is made public.  No one can be proven innocent here.  El Bravo is right, and where they should be looking is after the leak, who caused the PR insanity for everyone involved.  If they find a way to inhibit people&#8217;s willingness to share this information, they will have spent their time and money well.</p>
<p>The process was well defined.  Someone found the test didn&#8217;t follow the process.  I love that so many people feel they  are so educated that they feel they are MORE informed than the person employed by 2 incredibly powerful organizations, with opposing viewpoints, who they presented information to make an informed decision.</p>
<p>Can we please just talk about PFP and other related nonsense now?  I think the press is 900X more outraged than the general public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Bravo</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-264111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Bravo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-264111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And I agree...especially about the leak.  The problem here is that these leaks will ALWAYS occur when big names are involed and/or the stakes are high.  It happens in politics, sports, and everywhere else.  The rules need to take that into account somehow.  If there were a way to punish the leaker(s) that&#039;d be nice, but finding out the culprits is usaually next to impossible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I agree&#8230;especially about the leak.  The problem here is that these leaks will ALWAYS occur when big names are involed and/or the stakes are high.  It happens in politics, sports, and everywhere else.  The rules need to take that into account somehow.  If there were a way to punish the leaker(s) that&#8217;d be nice, but finding out the culprits is usaually next to impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koufaxmitzvah</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-264040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[koufaxmitzvah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-264040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This breach of chain of command shows just how flimsy the entire process happens to be.

If Braun was such a user of drugs, why had he never been caught before? He&#039;s come of age in MLB during testing done at the minor league level. That Oct test wasn&#039;t the first time he was tested on major league level. And then he tests positive on a sample that was brought home and kept in a fridge (allegedly) for 2 days....

This whole thing reeks. 

The real bottom line is that the initial findings should not have been leaked. Which is another example of the lack of professionalism and case security that the handling of personal information requires. Nevermind from any of these reports is the lack of really knowing whether the sample taken, tested, and stored were one and the same. I mean, who am I suppose to trust? Bud? WADA? The courier? ESPN?

None of them have earned my trust. All of them are culprits until this entire facade is done away with.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This breach of chain of command shows just how flimsy the entire process happens to be.</p>
<p>If Braun was such a user of drugs, why had he never been caught before? He&#8217;s come of age in MLB during testing done at the minor league level. That Oct test wasn&#8217;t the first time he was tested on major league level. And then he tests positive on a sample that was brought home and kept in a fridge (allegedly) for 2 days&#8230;.</p>
<p>This whole thing reeks. </p>
<p>The real bottom line is that the initial findings should not have been leaked. Which is another example of the lack of professionalism and case security that the handling of personal information requires. Nevermind from any of these reports is the lack of really knowing whether the sample taken, tested, and stored were one and the same. I mean, who am I suppose to trust? Bud? WADA? The courier? ESPN?</p>
<p>None of them have earned my trust. All of them are culprits until this entire facade is done away with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gamera the Brave</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-264034</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gamera the Brave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-264034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[paper,
Well said (golf claps).
This issue has really stirred up the troops, and I think Craig as well.
Some of the most interesting comment threads in a long time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paper,<br />
Well said (golf claps).<br />
This issue has really stirred up the troops, and I think Craig as well.<br />
Some of the most interesting comment threads in a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Bravo</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-264012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Bravo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-264012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d like to know more.  I won&#039;t likely ever find out more.  That&#039;s frustrating.  Like, for instance, why is it such a huge breach in chain of custoday to put a sample in the fridge at a tester&#039;s house overnight?  I see the opening for tainting samples here, but in this case, I find it kind of amazing that that would be the kicker to why Braun won the ruling.  

The MLB will likely adjust their rules on chain of command for this scenario to never reoccur.  It will be an easy fix I&#039;m sure.  But like I said, IF that is the one thing he got off on, then that sucks for the MLB, the fans (except the Milwaukee fans I presume) and for other players not named Braun.  One, it shows the MLB&#039;s procedures are flawed (which has good aspects as well, but flaws aren&#039;t good on their face), two, it doesn&#039;t enlighten anyone to whether or not Braun actually was cheating (which sucks b/c if he was and won an MVP, that bums me out a bit), and three, the fans will just never know what to think.  Well I don&#039;t know what to think now, so no matter what, this sucks for the fans....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to know more.  I won&#8217;t likely ever find out more.  That&#8217;s frustrating.  Like, for instance, why is it such a huge breach in chain of custoday to put a sample in the fridge at a tester&#8217;s house overnight?  I see the opening for tainting samples here, but in this case, I find it kind of amazing that that would be the kicker to why Braun won the ruling.  </p>
<p>The MLB will likely adjust their rules on chain of command for this scenario to never reoccur.  It will be an easy fix I&#8217;m sure.  But like I said, IF that is the one thing he got off on, then that sucks for the MLB, the fans (except the Milwaukee fans I presume) and for other players not named Braun.  One, it shows the MLB&#8217;s procedures are flawed (which has good aspects as well, but flaws aren&#8217;t good on their face), two, it doesn&#8217;t enlighten anyone to whether or not Braun actually was cheating (which sucks b/c if he was and won an MVP, that bums me out a bit), and three, the fans will just never know what to think.  Well I don&#8217;t know what to think now, so no matter what, this sucks for the fans&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dowhatifeellike</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-264000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dowhatifeellike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-264000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t have an opinion either way, but &quot;not guilty&quot; is not the same as &quot;innocent&quot;. The judge could not prove conclusively that Braun was using a testosterone supplement, but that doesn&#039;t mean he didn&#039;t do it. And testosterone supplements are not illegal - you just can&#039;t take testosterone directly. You can go to any supplement store and get a bottle of test precursors that become test through normal metabolic processes. They&#039;re not &quot;steriods&quot; and you&#039;re not getting ridiculous doses of test, but they do elevate test levels.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have an opinion either way, but &#8220;not guilty&#8221; is not the same as &#8220;innocent&#8221;. The judge could not prove conclusively that Braun was using a testosterone supplement, but that doesn&#8217;t mean he didn&#8217;t do it. And testosterone supplements are not illegal &#8211; you just can&#8217;t take testosterone directly. You can go to any supplement store and get a bottle of test precursors that become test through normal metabolic processes. They&#8217;re not &#8220;steriods&#8221; and you&#8217;re not getting ridiculous doses of test, but they do elevate test levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fergie22</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fergie22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lets he plays for who  oh yeah the brewers

and who is the head of baseball oh yeah bud the pud which team did he own?

just saying    jmo]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lets he plays for who  oh yeah the brewers</p>
<p>and who is the head of baseball oh yeah bud the pud which team did he own?</p>
<p>just saying    jmo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cur68</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cur68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m failing to see where I&#039;ve been victimized by Braun, Bonds, McGuire, Clemens, Palmiero etc. Some of those guys were jerks, but not becasue of PEDs, but because they&#039;re jerks even without PEDs. The one thing I can see is that anyone forming strong opinion on all this conjecture is risking looking pretty foolish if the actual facts come to light and it turns out that chain of custody is the least of the problem with MLB&#039;s case against Braun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m failing to see where I&#8217;ve been victimized by Braun, Bonds, McGuire, Clemens, Palmiero etc. Some of those guys were jerks, but not becasue of PEDs, but because they&#8217;re jerks even without PEDs. The one thing I can see is that anyone forming strong opinion on all this conjecture is risking looking pretty foolish if the actual facts come to light and it turns out that chain of custody is the least of the problem with MLB&#8217;s case against Braun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themohel</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263926</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themohel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Koufax - here you go, read a little before you say things...http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7608360/milwaukee-brewers-ryan-braun-wins-appeal-50-game-suspension]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Koufax &#8211; here you go, read a little before you say things&#8230;<a href="http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7608360/milwaukee-brewers-ryan-braun-wins-appeal-50-game-suspension" rel="nofollow">http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7608360/milwaukee-brewers-ryan-braun-wins-appeal-50-game-suspension</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: makeham98</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263914</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[makeham98]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saying McGwire didn&#039;t test positive is as lame as it gets. . .   he admitted using steroids.  He cheated.  A test is unnecessary for him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying McGwire didn&#8217;t test positive is as lame as it gets. . .   he admitted using steroids.  He cheated.  A test is unnecessary for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koufaxmitzvah</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[koufaxmitzvah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mohel: You keep saying over and over again that Ryan Braun tested positive. He did not test positive. The sample of which a positive test was taken and attributed to Ryan Braun was, in and of itself, tainted. 

Your argument is as tainted as the supposed sample.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mohel: You keep saying over and over again that Ryan Braun tested positive. He did not test positive. The sample of which a positive test was taken and attributed to Ryan Braun was, in and of itself, tainted. </p>
<p>Your argument is as tainted as the supposed sample.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badmamainphilliesjamas</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[badmamainphilliesjamas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[reply fail . . . should&#039;ve just thumbs-upped paperlions @8:50 am]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reply fail . . . should&#8217;ve just thumbs-upped paperlions @8:50 am</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themohel</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263845</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themohel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philly - I am personally not too worked up over steroid use in general, and don&#039;t feel like a victim. Many are though, so my point is that if one gets worked up over Bonds, McGuire, and Palmiero (and non-proven users like Sosa and Bagwell), one would get worked up about Braun.  I mean, he actually tested positive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philly &#8211; I am personally not too worked up over steroid use in general, and don&#8217;t feel like a victim. Many are though, so my point is that if one gets worked up over Bonds, McGuire, and Palmiero (and non-proven users like Sosa and Bagwell), one would get worked up about Braun.  I mean, he actually tested positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badmamainphilliesjamas</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263844</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[badmamainphilliesjamas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[^This x 1000]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^This x 1000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillyphreak</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263827</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phillyphreak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paper, I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve read by now but I think the arbiter gets 30 days to file his enitre written report.  Hopefully we get to see that in some way.

@TheMohel: I don&#039;t understand anyone feeling like a victim (any fan I mean).  I sure didn&#039;t feel victimized watching McGwire and Sosa battle it out that year.  I didn&#039;t feel victimized watching Bonds be one of the best players ever in baseball.   The funny thing is that no one really felt victimized at those times either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paper, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve read by now but I think the arbiter gets 30 days to file his enitre written report.  Hopefully we get to see that in some way.</p>
<p>@TheMohel: I don&#8217;t understand anyone feeling like a victim (any fan I mean).  I sure didn&#8217;t feel victimized watching McGwire and Sosa battle it out that year.  I didn&#8217;t feel victimized watching Bonds be one of the best players ever in baseball.   The funny thing is that no one really felt victimized at those times either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263818</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could I get a link to the text of the arbiter&#039;s decision?  I&#039;d love to exactly why the test was thrown out then.....or is this another anonymous &quot;some one with knowledge&quot;-based speculative comment?

Here is the thing about anonymous comments: they are usually wrong.  Realizing that they are usually wrong, what would make you decide to believe any of them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could I get a link to the text of the arbiter&#8217;s decision?  I&#8217;d love to exactly why the test was thrown out then&#8230;..or is this another anonymous &#8220;some one with knowledge&#8221;-based speculative comment?</p>
<p>Here is the thing about anonymous comments: they are usually wrong.  Realizing that they are usually wrong, what would make you decide to believe any of them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themohel</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263813</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themohel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paperlions - the arbitrator did NOT decide that the chain of custody was broken; the chain of custody was completely intact.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paperlions &#8211; the arbitrator did NOT decide that the chain of custody was broken; the chain of custody was completely intact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themohel</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themohel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll agree that a sample should be secure; but isn&#039;t it secure in the locked dwelling of the person who took it?  The seals were all properly attached when it arrived at the lab.  These tests are often done after FedEx/Kinkos has closed for the night/weekend.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll agree that a sample should be secure; but isn&#8217;t it secure in the locked dwelling of the person who took it?  The seals were all properly attached when it arrived at the lab.  These tests are often done after FedEx/Kinkos has closed for the night/weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themohel</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themohel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly correct.  There is no allegation of &quot;bad acts&quot; by anyone.  The agreement says that the sample needs to be sent in right away, and the arbitrator ruled that keeping it overnight (even though chain of custody was handled correctly) was a violation of the agreement and he can&#039;t be suspended.  NOTHING about this means that the sample wasn&#039;t his or was a false positive - that sample tested positive TWICE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly correct.  There is no allegation of &#8220;bad acts&#8221; by anyone.  The agreement says that the sample needs to be sent in right away, and the arbitrator ruled that keeping it overnight (even though chain of custody was handled correctly) was a violation of the agreement and he can&#8217;t be suspended.  NOTHING about this means that the sample wasn&#8217;t his or was a false positive &#8211; that sample tested positive TWICE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walk</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263794</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a few things about this process that bother me. It starts at beginning too. Stop your leaks. Someone and probably several people know who leaked the info. Fire them. The courier as far as i can tell did follow procedure. However the procedure is terrible. That sample should never have been left unattended and unsecured. I cannot stress how badly that need to be changed. If it is going to be stored it needs to be locked away.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a few things about this process that bother me. It starts at beginning too. Stop your leaks. Someone and probably several people know who leaked the info. Fire them. The courier as far as i can tell did follow procedure. However the procedure is terrible. That sample should never have been left unattended and unsecured. I cannot stress how badly that need to be changed. If it is going to be stored it needs to be locked away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themohel</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themohel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Church - many believe that fans have been &quot;victims&quot; of PED use in baseball.  If this were not the case, there would be no interest in the topic.  If we are all victims, of Bonds, Palmiero, McGuire, etc., than we are in the same sense &quot;potential&quot; victims of the use of PED&#039;s by Braun.  Again, this ruling was not about whether his sample contained the drug; I think he will need to answer that in the court of public opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Church &#8211; many believe that fans have been &#8220;victims&#8221; of PED use in baseball.  If this were not the case, there would be no interest in the topic.  If we are all victims, of Bonds, Palmiero, McGuire, etc., than we are in the same sense &#8220;potential&#8221; victims of the use of PED&#8217;s by Braun.  Again, this ruling was not about whether his sample contained the drug; I think he will need to answer that in the court of public opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillyphreak</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phillyphreak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought Craig had posted an blog from a doctor at Hopkins that said Herpes meds would NOT have raised his testosterone levels.  But I&#039;m all for leaving his personal life alone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Craig had posted an blog from a doctor at Hopkins that said Herpes meds would NOT have raised his testosterone levels.  But I&#8217;m all for leaving his personal life alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, the sample tested positive for huge levels of testosterone, which is not the same as Braun testing positive.  If (as was decided by an arbiter with infinitely more information than we have....and much of the &quot;information&quot; posted here is here say and conjecture, not established fact) the chain of custody was broken, then it can not be established that the sample was that provided by Braun.

Does it not seem strange to you that in a sample with questionable custody, the rumored result was that the test revealed never been seen levels of testosterone?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the sample tested positive for huge levels of testosterone, which is not the same as Braun testing positive.  If (as was decided by an arbiter with infinitely more information than we have&#8230;.and much of the &#8220;information&#8221; posted here is here say and conjecture, not established fact) the chain of custody was broken, then it can not be established that the sample was that provided by Braun.</p>
<p>Does it not seem strange to you that in a sample with questionable custody, the rumored result was that the test revealed never been seen levels of testosterone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rooney24</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rooney24]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would think the seals need to be sealed and signed in front of the person who was being tested.  So, even if the tester had other seals, I don&#039;t think replacing them would have been an easy option.  It&#039;s nice that you automatically assume corruption and tampering.  Everyone is complaining about assuming Braun did wrong with &quot;no proof&quot;, while you jump to an allegation of what I assume would be illegal activity with zero proof.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think the seals need to be sealed and signed in front of the person who was being tested.  So, even if the tester had other seals, I don&#8217;t think replacing them would have been an easy option.  It&#8217;s nice that you automatically assume corruption and tampering.  Everyone is complaining about assuming Braun did wrong with &#8220;no proof&#8221;, while you jump to an allegation of what I assume would be illegal activity with zero proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny 5</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonny 5]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not convinced there was any chain of custody issue and this test being overturned seems like a case where the guilty got away with being guilty for no good reason (only because the chain of custody protocol seems intact). Could Braun sue MLB over confidentiality if he had to go public with something? Like say having Herpes? Forcing MLB to broker a deal to toss the charges or be sued for a substantial amount? I&#039;m just grasping straws here because this really doesn&#039;t make much sense right now to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not convinced there was any chain of custody issue and this test being overturned seems like a case where the guilty got away with being guilty for no good reason (only because the chain of custody protocol seems intact). Could Braun sue MLB over confidentiality if he had to go public with something? Like say having Herpes? Forcing MLB to broker a deal to toss the charges or be sued for a substantial amount? I&#8217;m just grasping straws here because this really doesn&#8217;t make much sense right now to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;“potential” victims, though, such as fans of Braun, the Brewers, and baseball in general&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You have to explain this.  How has any fan, MLB or the Brewers suffered from this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“potential” victims, though, such as fans of Braun, the Brewers, and baseball in general</p></blockquote>
<p>You have to explain this.  How has any fan, MLB or the Brewers suffered from this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themohel</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themohel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First - the leak/rumor turned out to be exactly correct; he did test positive for huge levels of testosterone.

Second - There are plenty of solid facts out there (even on HBT alone) to form an opinion of the situation.

Third - I agree the this process should have been private, and that the leaker should be punished.  There are other &quot;potential&quot; victims, though, such as fans of Braun, the Brewers, and baseball in general.  This next part is purely from a &quot;court of public opinion&quot; point-of-view.  How did such a huge amount of a PED get into his system?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First &#8211; the leak/rumor turned out to be exactly correct; he did test positive for huge levels of testosterone.</p>
<p>Second &#8211; There are plenty of solid facts out there (even on HBT alone) to form an opinion of the situation.</p>
<p>Third &#8211; I agree the this process should have been private, and that the leaker should be punished.  There are other &#8220;potential&#8221; victims, though, such as fans of Braun, the Brewers, and baseball in general.  This next part is purely from a &#8220;court of public opinion&#8221; point-of-view.  How did such a huge amount of a PED get into his system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/24/your-morning-ryan-bruan-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-263768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=115330#comment-263768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t +1 this enough]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t +1 this enough</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
