Feb 27, 2012, 9:30 PM EDT
UPDATE: Rosenthal reports that the two sides are closing in on a five-year deal in the $70-75 million range.
Molina would make $14-15 million per season if Rosenthal is correct, which would give him the second-highest AAV (average annual value) for a catcher ever behind Joe Mauer‘s current eight-year, $184 million contract ($23 million).
As Rosenthal notes, only six catchers have ever signed long-term deals which averaged more than $10 million per season: Mauer, Mike Piazza, Jason Kendall, Jorge Posada, Ivan Rodriguez and Jason Varitek.
5:44 PM: Last week the Cardinals and Yadier Molina were said to be making good progress on a long-term contract extension and now Joe Strauss of the St. Louis Post Dispatch reports that “terms are all but finalized.”
According to Strauss an agreement is expected to be in place by Friday and “both sides are very optimistic.”
Molina is currently slated to be a free agent next offseason, finishing up a five-year, $21.75 million deal that has proven to be a bargain for the Cardinals. Most speculation about his new deal has guessed 4-5 seasons at $10-12 million per year, which would be one of the five largest contracts ever for a catcher.
- 2015 Preview: Arizona Diamondbacks 0
- 2015 Preview: Toronto Blue Jays 47
- Mariners prospect Victor Sanchez has died 24
- 2015 Preview: Chicago White Sox 15
- Did David Ortiz admit to more than he realized with his Players’ Tribune editorial? 87
- 2015 Preview: Atlanta Braves 15
- David Ortiz: “Nobody in MLB history has been tested for PEDs more than me” 118
- 2015 Preview: Chicago Cubs 14
- Ex-Cardinals outfielder Curt Ford was assaulted in St. Louis and told to “go back to Ferguson” (122)
- David Ortiz: “Nobody in MLB history has been tested for PEDs more than me” (118)
- Mo’ne Davis says college ballplayer who wrote an offensive tweet about her deserves a second chance (89)
- Rob Manfred says it would be hard to reinstate Pete Rose in a limited way (89)
- Did David Ortiz admit to more than he realized with his Players’ Tribune editorial? (87)