Mar 2, 2012, 11:02 AM EST
Bryan Stow and his family have sued the Dodgers over the attack that severely injured him last Opening Day. The Dodgers have tried to have the lawsuit thrown out in bankruptcy court, because it’s way easier to dispose of such claims in bankruptcy court. Last week Stow’s attorneys filed a motion ripping the Dodgers a new one for trying to prevent Stow from getting his day in court.
Now the Dodgers have offered a compromise in which Stow could advance his claims in regular Superior Court and, if they can make it that far, get in front of a jury:
In Thursday’s filing, the Dodgers offered to defer to the Superior Court upon three conditions — that Stow does not oppose the team’s emergence from bankruptcy; that Stow waits until that emergence to proceed with the civil suit; and that Stow seeks to recover damages only from the Dodgers’ insurance carriers and not from the defendants themselves. Dodgers owner Frank McCourt is one of the defendants in the civil suit.
It was probably going to be a longshot to get a court to find McCourt and other individual defendants liable anyway. So if this allows the suit to advance, it makes a lot of sense.
- Hector Olivera’s camp denies any damage to ulnar collateral ligament 3
- UPDATE: Hunter Pence out 6-8 weeks with fracture in left forearm 21
- MLBPA: leaks are from people “who want to see Josh Hamilton hurt personally and professionally” 20
- Suspending Josh Hamilton for a year would be obscene 145
- Report: MLB panel split on rehab for Josh Hamilton; one-year suspension is in play 45
- Joc Pederson goes 2-for-2 in Cactus League debut 6
- Braves scratch Mike Minor from start with more shoulder problems 6
- Daniel Murphy on Billy Bean: “I do disagree with the fact that Billy is a homosexual” 373
- Daniel Murphy on Billy Bean: “I do disagree with the fact that Billy is a homosexual” (374)
- Suspending Josh Hamilton for a year would be obscene (145)
- Curt Schilling lowers the boom on some men tweeting threats against his daughter (137)
- That facts of Josh Hamilton’s case should not be a matter of public record (94)
- Billy Bean responds to Daniel Murphy’s comments (90)