Mar 14, 2012, 6:23 PM EDT
Jim Forkin of CNBC reports the judge in the upcoming Madoff/Wilpon/Mets trial ruled this afternoon that it is the defendants — meaning the Mets owners — who have the burden of proof. Not the bankruptcy trustee.
This is a pretty big deal. I haven’t seen the exact ruling, but it would seem that rather than forcing trustee Irving Picard to prove that the Mets owners were willfully blind to Madoff’s scheme while investing with him, it is now on the Mets owners to prove that they didn’t know that it was a scam or, that they behaved prudently at all turns or something along those lines.
The exact bogey they have to meet is key here. Depending on how it’s phrased, it could put the Mets owners in a prove-a-negative situation, or something close to it.
No matter what it is, however, it’s way easier to play defense than offense in these things, and thus the case just got that much tougher for Fred Wilpon, Saul Katz and the Mets.
- And That Happened: Monday’s scores and highlights 0
- Monday’s White Sox/Orioles game postponed due to ongoing protests and violence in Baltimore 134
- Cardinals confirm Adam Wainwright is done for season with torn Achilles 19
- Source: Josh Hamilton rejected a trade to a National League team because he wanted to go back to Texas 48
- Deal done: Josh Hamilton traded to the Texas Rangers for cash considerations 49
- Pitchers batting is dumb and the DH should be universal 355
- And That Happened: Sunday’s scores and highlights 88
- Alex Rodriguez hits 659th career home run, now one shy of tying Willie Mays 60
- Pitchers batting is dumb and the DH should be universal (355)
- Comment of the Day: do not underestimate the seriousness of the anti-DH crowd (198)
- The early leaders in MLB’s “Franchise Four” thing have been announced (166)
- The Royals and White Sox had a benches-clearing fracas, five players ejected (162)
- Protesters converge on Oriole Park at Camden Yards (149)