Mar 14, 2012, 6:23 PM EDT
Jim Forkin of CNBC reports the judge in the upcoming Madoff/Wilpon/Mets trial ruled this afternoon that it is the defendants — meaning the Mets owners — who have the burden of proof. Not the bankruptcy trustee.
This is a pretty big deal. I haven’t seen the exact ruling, but it would seem that rather than forcing trustee Irving Picard to prove that the Mets owners were willfully blind to Madoff’s scheme while investing with him, it is now on the Mets owners to prove that they didn’t know that it was a scam or, that they behaved prudently at all turns or something along those lines.
The exact bogey they have to meet is key here. Depending on how it’s phrased, it could put the Mets owners in a prove-a-negative situation, or something close to it.
No matter what it is, however, it’s way easier to play defense than offense in these things, and thus the case just got that much tougher for Fred Wilpon, Saul Katz and the Mets.
- Masahiro Tanaka to pitch on Sunday 7
- Astros shut down George Springer for the season 0
- The Blue Jays will make a qualifying offer to Melky Cabrera 16
- And That Happened: Monday’s scores and highlights 34
- MLB suspends Jonathan Papelbon seven games for incident during Sunday’s game 42
- VIDEO: Jacob deGrom begins game with eight straight strikeouts to tie MLB record 11
- Bud Selig says MLB and players union will meet this week about domestic abuse policy 8
- And That Happened: Sunday’s scores and highlights 67
- Chris Davis suspended 25 games for amphetamine use (92)
- A few thoughts about the discrimination lawsuit against the Mets (91)
- Giancarlo Stanton diagnosed with multiple facial fractures and dental damage (91)
- Bud Selig can’t remember the last domestic violence incident in Major League Baseball (88)
- A couple of initial thoughts on the Chris Davis suspension (83)