Comments on: Carlos Santana, Indians agree on a five-year extension

By: societichairpelin

societichairpelin — Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:44:31 +0000

haha…that wouldn’t surprise anybody

By: bigtrav425

bigtrav425 — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:18:47 +0000

For once the Dolans and tribes front office did something good…now they have to get a few hitters to put around him

By: boh930

boh930 — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:22:35 +0000

Pfft, stupid Cleveland. In 100 years we’ll be playing spaceball, not baseball. Hasn’t anybody from the Indians seen the Jetsons?

By: Gamera the Brave

Gamera the Brave — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:21:21 +0000

After watching yesterday’s Giants game, I have concluded that Zito wants to be Jamie Moyer when he grows up.

By: bravojawja

bravojawja — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:15:49 +0000

I dunno – is it a good idea to pay a catcher into his age 131 season? How many times will his knees have been replaced?

By: Utley's Hair

Utley's Hair — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:14:11 +0000

I wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss the 2117 end date. After all, Jamie Moyer will still be playing, won’t he?

By: dan1111

dan1111 — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:53:54 +0000

They were wise not to go to 106 guaranteed years.

By: dan1111

dan1111 — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:52:51 +0000

I think Hoynes got his math wrong. That looks like a 105 year extension to me. The Indians must be expecting both great performance and medical breakthroughs. Perhaps one day, players of a certain age will all undergo Carlos Santana surgery.

By: runyetirun

runyetirun — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:52:05 +0000

In 105 years when the Indians can exercise that option they are going to look BRILLIANT