Comments on: Royals sticking with Jonathan Broxton as closer http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/13/royals-sticking-with-jonathan-broxton-as-closer/ Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball. Tue, 21 May 2013 20:53:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: micker716 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/13/royals-sticking-with-jonathan-broxton-as-closer/comment-page-1/#comment-284306 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 01:44:32 +0000 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=139493#comment-284306 “He just lost command of his fastball,”

Well, as long as it wasn’t anything important. Plenty of pitchers are successful without command of their primary pitch.

]]> By: royalsfaninfargo http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/13/royals-sticking-with-jonathan-broxton-as-closer/comment-page-1/#comment-284108 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:29:28 +0000 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=139493#comment-284108 Holland or Crow would be the likely picks, but I am going to trust Yost on this.

]]> By: jimbo1949 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/13/royals-sticking-with-jonathan-broxton-as-closer/comment-page-1/#comment-284006 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:35:03 +0000 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=139493#comment-284006 Royals sucking with Jonathan Broxton as closer.

At least that’s what it looked like at first glance,

]]> By: elliotmalin http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/13/royals-sticking-with-jonathan-broxton-as-closer/comment-page-1/#comment-283984 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:02:31 +0000 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=139493#comment-283984 What about the last couple of years for him with the Dodgers? Hopefully he is able to recover and get back to where he was a few years ago.

]]> By: stex52 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/13/royals-sticking-with-jonathan-broxton-as-closer/comment-page-1/#comment-283964 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:26:32 +0000 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=139493#comment-283964 Just on principle, it’s dumb to decide anything about a MLB player based on a single bad performance. But boy, that was one for the books.

]]>