<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And That Happened: Sunday&#8217;s scores and highlights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/</link>
	<description>Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:01:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree spud.  How about this.  He made an effort to contact the ball with bat, and during said effort, the bat achieve an orientation perpendicular to the flight path of the pitch, thereby qualifying the effort as a &quot;swing&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree spud.  How about this.  He made an effort to contact the ball with bat, and during said effort, the bat achieve an orientation perpendicular to the flight path of the pitch, thereby qualifying the effort as a &#8220;swing&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Gator</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Old Gator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not on mine, though.

Because of the rainout in DC, the Gnats did &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; have an opportunity to serve notice on the Feesh that a massive offseason spending splurge that nevertheless fails to address critical needs and balances on a team, run production being foremost amongst them, is no innoculation against dying of offensive anemia on a regular basis, making adequate pitchers look good and good pitchers look bulletproof. At the same time, Josh Johnson did &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; prove conclusively that his arm isn&#039;t moribund by digging himself a thirty pitch hole in the bottom of the first; Gaby Sanchez did not turn in a couple of sparkling plays to atone for his game-euthanizer the night before, the Iron Giant did not bust out of his gimpy-kneed offensive swoon, Jose Reyes did not finally start putting up the kind of offensive numbers Scrooge McLoria paid for during his offseason tennis court oath, Tweeter did not line a couple more hits to demonstrate that he has conclusively recovered from his nightmarish 2011 performance, Omar Infante&#039;s mysteriously sore groin did not heal sufficiently to permit him to rediscover the hot hitting he exhibited in splendid isolation amongst his teammates to open the season, and the Hanster did not have an opportunity to reanimate the hot streak he enjoyed against the hapless Cubbies back at Macondo Banana Massacre Field last week, and finally, Slobbering Ozzie had to get on the bus and flee to Gotham too precipitously to find time to go to a local bar and get himself drunk and say something stupid and inflammatory again. 

Meanwhile, I am en route to Cincinnati on the expectation that Over the Rhine will sit in with Cowboy Junkies tomorrow night. I noticed that there seem to be a lot more really hot looking TSA cuties guarding the gates of aeronautical freedom these days - when did &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; happen? - but when you need a pat-down, no luck - they still call for the one who looks like a minotaur with scabies to do the honors.

Ah well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not on mine, though.</p>
<p>Because of the rainout in DC, the Gnats did <i>not</i> have an opportunity to serve notice on the Feesh that a massive offseason spending splurge that nevertheless fails to address critical needs and balances on a team, run production being foremost amongst them, is no innoculation against dying of offensive anemia on a regular basis, making adequate pitchers look good and good pitchers look bulletproof. At the same time, Josh Johnson did <i>not</i> prove conclusively that his arm isn&#8217;t moribund by digging himself a thirty pitch hole in the bottom of the first; Gaby Sanchez did not turn in a couple of sparkling plays to atone for his game-euthanizer the night before, the Iron Giant did not bust out of his gimpy-kneed offensive swoon, Jose Reyes did not finally start putting up the kind of offensive numbers Scrooge McLoria paid for during his offseason tennis court oath, Tweeter did not line a couple more hits to demonstrate that he has conclusively recovered from his nightmarish 2011 performance, Omar Infante&#8217;s mysteriously sore groin did not heal sufficiently to permit him to rediscover the hot hitting he exhibited in splendid isolation amongst his teammates to open the season, and the Hanster did not have an opportunity to reanimate the hot streak he enjoyed against the hapless Cubbies back at Macondo Banana Massacre Field last week, and finally, Slobbering Ozzie had to get on the bus and flee to Gotham too precipitously to find time to go to a local bar and get himself drunk and say something stupid and inflammatory again. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, I am en route to Cincinnati on the expectation that Over the Rhine will sit in with Cowboy Junkies tomorrow night. I noticed that there seem to be a lot more really hot looking TSA cuties guarding the gates of aeronautical freedom these days &#8211; when did <i>that</i> happen? &#8211; but when you need a pat-down, no luck &#8211; they still call for the one who looks like a minotaur with scabies to do the honors.</p>
<p>Ah well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spudchukar</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spudchukar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have not consulted the rule book regarding what is a swing and what isn&#039;t these days, but if the definition is the bat crossing the plate, it is downright stupid.  If this is the barometer, then a player who chooses to hit from the front of the batter&#039;s box, should have every pitch thrown to him called a swinging strike, whether he takes his bat off his shoulder or not. 

A swinging strike needs to be better defined, and stop having the home plate umpire make the determination, he has enough to do, and does not have a good angle.

The traditional breaking your wrists is still the best, but the language is fuzzy to some, so something like &quot;past the point of perpendicular with the plate&quot; is the best indication of a swing.  If the bat ever goes past a 90 degree angle to the plate it is a swing.  The only problem with this, and why &quot;breaking your wrists&quot; is better is it allows for swing that are started, then stopped, on pitches that come close to hitting the batter.  Theoretically, a player&#039;s bat could then go past perpendicular, in an attempt to avoid being hit, but perhaps a caveat clause could be added.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not consulted the rule book regarding what is a swing and what isn&#8217;t these days, but if the definition is the bat crossing the plate, it is downright stupid.  If this is the barometer, then a player who chooses to hit from the front of the batter&#8217;s box, should have every pitch thrown to him called a swinging strike, whether he takes his bat off his shoulder or not. </p>
<p>A swinging strike needs to be better defined, and stop having the home plate umpire make the determination, he has enough to do, and does not have a good angle.</p>
<p>The traditional breaking your wrists is still the best, but the language is fuzzy to some, so something like &#8220;past the point of perpendicular with the plate&#8221; is the best indication of a swing.  If the bat ever goes past a 90 degree angle to the plate it is a swing.  The only problem with this, and why &#8220;breaking your wrists&#8221; is better is it allows for swing that are started, then stopped, on pitches that come close to hitting the batter.  Theoretically, a player&#8217;s bat could then go past perpendicular, in an attempt to avoid being hit, but perhaps a caveat clause could be added.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Gator</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Old Gator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;13 ways of stupid comment&quot; - hey, great reference! I &lt;i&gt;love&lt;/i&gt; Wallace Stevens.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;13 ways of stupid comment&#8221; &#8211; hey, great reference! I <i>love</i> Wallace Stevens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spudchukar</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spudchukar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The difference is Beltran can still play!  He was slowed only by injury.  Wells and Abeau are healthy and lousy.  Regardless how you value them, intelligent baseball minds know they are washed up.  Maybe Trout needs more seasoning, that is a viable argument, but he is an upgrade, particularly defensively, and on the bases, and even a disappointing season offensively would be in the same neighborhood of the best case scenarios for either of the has-beens.  

The reason nobody wants Abreau is cause he is out of shape, a defensive liability, can no longer steal a base, and doesn&#039;t have the power for a DH.  He is in the last year of his contract, so a release, is what he wanted in Spring Training, then maybe with his salary team, somebody might have taken a platoon flier on him, if he came free (being the major league minimum.)

But Wells is another story, he is signed through 2014.  Talk about an Albatross.  He can no longer play center, isn&#039;t even a good corner outfielder anymore.  He no longer even steals 10 bases a year, and is a OBP nightmare.  The only way the Angels can rid themselves of him is to eat the majority of his $63 million contract.  If they are willing to pay say $15 mil per year, then perhaps some team would be foolish enough to swing a deal, but if he fails to produce which is highly likely, they would still be on the hook for $12 in 2013/2014.

I just cannot see any team going there.  The Angels must be hoping they can somehow play him enough to showcase him, pray he gets hot, and move him with the least amount of burden.  But my guess is, he matches last year&#039;s numbers, plays about 1/2 the time, and finally is either released or moved for an single A play with marginal upside, eating $40-45 mil while doing so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference is Beltran can still play!  He was slowed only by injury.  Wells and Abeau are healthy and lousy.  Regardless how you value them, intelligent baseball minds know they are washed up.  Maybe Trout needs more seasoning, that is a viable argument, but he is an upgrade, particularly defensively, and on the bases, and even a disappointing season offensively would be in the same neighborhood of the best case scenarios for either of the has-beens.  </p>
<p>The reason nobody wants Abreau is cause he is out of shape, a defensive liability, can no longer steal a base, and doesn&#8217;t have the power for a DH.  He is in the last year of his contract, so a release, is what he wanted in Spring Training, then maybe with his salary team, somebody might have taken a platoon flier on him, if he came free (being the major league minimum.)</p>
<p>But Wells is another story, he is signed through 2014.  Talk about an Albatross.  He can no longer play center, isn&#8217;t even a good corner outfielder anymore.  He no longer even steals 10 bases a year, and is a OBP nightmare.  The only way the Angels can rid themselves of him is to eat the majority of his $63 million contract.  If they are willing to pay say $15 mil per year, then perhaps some team would be foolish enough to swing a deal, but if he fails to produce which is highly likely, they would still be on the hook for $12 in 2013/2014.</p>
<p>I just cannot see any team going there.  The Angels must be hoping they can somehow play him enough to showcase him, pray he gets hot, and move him with the least amount of burden.  But my guess is, he matches last year&#8217;s numbers, plays about 1/2 the time, and finally is either released or moved for an single A play with marginal upside, eating $40-45 mil while doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillyphreak</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phillyphreak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1) What?

2) &quot;Appear to have spent poorly&quot; is probably a little over the top after 16 games.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) What?</p>
<p>2) &#8220;Appear to have spent poorly&#8221; is probably a little over the top after 16 games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hittfamily</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hittfamily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mets got the #28 overall prospect for 1/3 of a season of an oft injured Carlos Beltran.  If the Angels picked up his salary, he has between 6-and 9 million dollars in value.  Offense desperate contending teams make reckless moves at the trade deadline.  If he shows he can bounce back  and be productive, a desperate contending team will part with a small peice of their future hoping to contend now.  Whether Wells plays 1/3 of a season or the entire season, they are paying his salary in it&#039;s entirity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mets got the #28 overall prospect for 1/3 of a season of an oft injured Carlos Beltran.  If the Angels picked up his salary, he has between 6-and 9 million dollars in value.  Offense desperate contending teams make reckless moves at the trade deadline.  If he shows he can bounce back  and be productive, a desperate contending team will part with a small peice of their future hoping to contend now.  Whether Wells plays 1/3 of a season or the entire season, they are paying his salary in it&#8217;s entirity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spudchukar</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spudchukar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which more than anything shows how sad WAR stats can be.  The Angels would have dumped him some time ago, had anybody offered anybody in return.   A top 100 prospect, you must be kidding me.  It would be a steal if they could get a top 300.  They have the #1 prospect in AAA who is blocked by the Abreau/Wells dilemma.  

The most prudent play would be to dump them ASAP.  No one can be sure that Trout will excel, but he is the #1 rated prospect for a reason, and the odds are better for him than anyone else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which more than anything shows how sad WAR stats can be.  The Angels would have dumped him some time ago, had anybody offered anybody in return.   A top 100 prospect, you must be kidding me.  It would be a steal if they could get a top 300.  They have the #1 prospect in AAA who is blocked by the Abreau/Wells dilemma.  </p>
<p>The most prudent play would be to dump them ASAP.  No one can be sure that Trout will excel, but he is the #1 rated prospect for a reason, and the odds are better for him than anyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pw38</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288749</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pw38]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because apparently it&#039;s impossible for Angels fans to admit that maybe the Rangers are the better team and there&#039;s a reason they&#039;re in first place so far.  April wins count just as much as Sept. wins...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because apparently it&#8217;s impossible for Angels fans to admit that maybe the Rangers are the better team and there&#8217;s a reason they&#8217;re in first place so far.  April wins count just as much as Sept. wins&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spudchukar</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spudchukar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey another 13 ways of stupid comment.  First off, it is way too early to determine which teams in which divisions are strong.  Second, you are talking about the World Series Champion St. Louis Cardinals, who if memory serves me right, defeated all the teams in the overrated AL East in 2011, who were not even strong enough to send a representative to the final round of the post season.

Third, St. Louis has only played two series against a traditionally &quot;bad&quot; teams in their first 16 games, a 3 game set vs the Cubs.  So far their schedule has had them play 6 games vs Cincinnati, 3 vs Milwaukee, three vs. the Pirates and one against Miami, and the 3 vs the Cubs.   

Fourthly, Cincinnati and Milwaukee are currently more talented than these American League teams, Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Kansas City, Minnesota, Seattle and Oakland.

Yes, there are 4 good teams in the AL East, and to date their respective records indicate that.  So if you wanted to make the point that St. Louis would not be 11-5 in that division, I would agree, but comparing them to cellar dwelling Boston in inane.  The point of the post (and I should not have to spell this out) was that unlike teams like Boston the Cards have overcome a handful of early season injuries with excellent reinforcements from young role players, which Boston obviously does not have or plan for.  

And you should know by now, I am an ardent Rays fan, and am well aware of the difficulties they overcome.  But in all honesty the Rays have not played particularly well early.  Outside of Shields the starting pitching has been mediocre, still no production from the middle infield, no real catcher to speak of, and a bull pen that is a mess.

Although extremely hypothetical, were the Rays to have replaced the Cards, and played the same schedule as St. Louis has played, I can guarantee you they would be no better than the  11-5 record St. Louis sports, and this goes for any other team in the AL East.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey another 13 ways of stupid comment.  First off, it is way too early to determine which teams in which divisions are strong.  Second, you are talking about the World Series Champion St. Louis Cardinals, who if memory serves me right, defeated all the teams in the overrated AL East in 2011, who were not even strong enough to send a representative to the final round of the post season.</p>
<p>Third, St. Louis has only played two series against a traditionally &#8220;bad&#8221; teams in their first 16 games, a 3 game set vs the Cubs.  So far their schedule has had them play 6 games vs Cincinnati, 3 vs Milwaukee, three vs. the Pirates and one against Miami, and the 3 vs the Cubs.   </p>
<p>Fourthly, Cincinnati and Milwaukee are currently more talented than these American League teams, Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Kansas City, Minnesota, Seattle and Oakland.</p>
<p>Yes, there are 4 good teams in the AL East, and to date their respective records indicate that.  So if you wanted to make the point that St. Louis would not be 11-5 in that division, I would agree, but comparing them to cellar dwelling Boston in inane.  The point of the post (and I should not have to spell this out) was that unlike teams like Boston the Cards have overcome a handful of early season injuries with excellent reinforcements from young role players, which Boston obviously does not have or plan for.  </p>
<p>And you should know by now, I am an ardent Rays fan, and am well aware of the difficulties they overcome.  But in all honesty the Rays have not played particularly well early.  Outside of Shields the starting pitching has been mediocre, still no production from the middle infield, no real catcher to speak of, and a bull pen that is a mess.</p>
<p>Although extremely hypothetical, were the Rays to have replaced the Cards, and played the same schedule as St. Louis has played, I can guarantee you they would be no better than the  11-5 record St. Louis sports, and this goes for any other team in the AL East.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hittfamily</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288716</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hittfamily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love how there is no real rule on this, but everybody argues about it.  If he hits that ball, it&#039;s a grounder to second base.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how there is no real rule on this, but everybody argues about it.  If he hits that ball, it&#8217;s a grounder to second base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hittfamily</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hittfamily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Marlon Byrd and Carlos Zambrano can be moved, Vernon Wells would surely have some takers.  He&#039;s 1 season removed from a 4 WAR, 125 wRC+ season, and is on pace for a 3 WAR season.  If they ate the salary, a decent prospect is definitely plausible, hell maybe even a top 100.  I think their plan was to use him the same way the Mets used Beltran last year to net a top 50 prospect at the deadline.  They were going to have to eat all of his salary one way or another, so why not maximize his value.  

With a last place start, that plan may have to change, and move he and Trumbo for a starter and bull pen help.  There won&#039;t be as many takers for either of them as there would be for Hunter.  If Hunter can still play center, the Nats have a surplus of MLB ready arms and a need for a center fielder.

One thing is certain.  The Angels are in a bind as far as their trade possibilities go.  They want to move aging players with big salaries for MLB ready talent.  The time to do that is the offseason and the deadline, not 2 weeks into the season.  The takers for those players will be teams vying for playoff spots, and won&#039;t want to help the Angels.  That makes Abreu untradable in my view.  Trumbo has value to  a NL team, but I doubt any NL team would give up much for Morales, as he is better suited for DH until he proves he can stay healthy.  

If I&#039;m running the club, I&#039;d let things play out.  Wells may bounce back, and Pujols will be Pujols.  Santana and Williams won&#039;t suck all season, and are very acceptable 4 and 5 starters.  I&#039;d leave Trout in AAA all season.  I&#039;m reminded of what Tampa did to Upton.  They brought him up at 19 without having a need for him.  It killed his progression.  He had to lean a new position, and fix his flaws at the MLB level, which turned a top prospect into an average #6 hitter.  Trout likely won&#039;t add anything that Wells and Hunter can&#039;t, except for SB.  It&#039;s not like he&#039;s a guaranteed .800 ops guy at 20 years old, so he&#039;s not really an upgrade.  If they are still below .500 in July, make some changes, but they only have to be better than either the Jays or Rays in the end when it is all said and done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Marlon Byrd and Carlos Zambrano can be moved, Vernon Wells would surely have some takers.  He&#8217;s 1 season removed from a 4 WAR, 125 wRC+ season, and is on pace for a 3 WAR season.  If they ate the salary, a decent prospect is definitely plausible, hell maybe even a top 100.  I think their plan was to use him the same way the Mets used Beltran last year to net a top 50 prospect at the deadline.  They were going to have to eat all of his salary one way or another, so why not maximize his value.  </p>
<p>With a last place start, that plan may have to change, and move he and Trumbo for a starter and bull pen help.  There won&#8217;t be as many takers for either of them as there would be for Hunter.  If Hunter can still play center, the Nats have a surplus of MLB ready arms and a need for a center fielder.</p>
<p>One thing is certain.  The Angels are in a bind as far as their trade possibilities go.  They want to move aging players with big salaries for MLB ready talent.  The time to do that is the offseason and the deadline, not 2 weeks into the season.  The takers for those players will be teams vying for playoff spots, and won&#8217;t want to help the Angels.  That makes Abreu untradable in my view.  Trumbo has value to  a NL team, but I doubt any NL team would give up much for Morales, as he is better suited for DH until he proves he can stay healthy.  </p>
<p>If I&#8217;m running the club, I&#8217;d let things play out.  Wells may bounce back, and Pujols will be Pujols.  Santana and Williams won&#8217;t suck all season, and are very acceptable 4 and 5 starters.  I&#8217;d leave Trout in AAA all season.  I&#8217;m reminded of what Tampa did to Upton.  They brought him up at 19 without having a need for him.  It killed his progression.  He had to lean a new position, and fix his flaws at the MLB level, which turned a top prospect into an average #6 hitter.  Trout likely won&#8217;t add anything that Wells and Hunter can&#8217;t, except for SB.  It&#8217;s not like he&#8217;s a guaranteed .800 ops guy at 20 years old, so he&#8217;s not really an upgrade.  If they are still below .500 in July, make some changes, but they only have to be better than either the Jays or Rays in the end when it is all said and done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: APBA Guy</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288708</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APBA Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The A&#039;s won yesterday, bringing to a close their 1-2 series against the Indians, sort of the polar opposite of the Angels right now. Where the Indians were patient, drawing walks in abundance, the Angels were super-aggressive, anxious even, swinging and making weak contact on borderline strikes and too many pitches out of the zone. That patience paid off in the first two games of the series for the Indians, but failed them yesterday as they couldn&#039;t get the hits with RISP against Tyson Ross, who has showed the same polish as he did last year pre-injury, despite 5 walks. Masterson topped those 5 with 6 of his own, and added 6 hits to yield a sparkling in-game WHiP of 2.40. Against the Rangers or the Yankees you could expect that. Against the A&#039;s, it means you really had no command.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The A&#8217;s won yesterday, bringing to a close their 1-2 series against the Indians, sort of the polar opposite of the Angels right now. Where the Indians were patient, drawing walks in abundance, the Angels were super-aggressive, anxious even, swinging and making weak contact on borderline strikes and too many pitches out of the zone. That patience paid off in the first two games of the series for the Indians, but failed them yesterday as they couldn&#8217;t get the hits with RISP against Tyson Ross, who has showed the same polish as he did last year pre-injury, despite 5 walks. Masterson topped those 5 with 6 of his own, and added 6 hits to yield a sparkling in-game WHiP of 2.40. Against the Rangers or the Yankees you could expect that. Against the A&#8217;s, it means you really had no command.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unconventionalidiot</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288697</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[unconventionalidiot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They post the gun readings at Wrigley on boards that hang from the rafters above the upper deck on both the first base and third base side. They also show out of town scores on those boards. They&#039;ve been there for a while, maybe 10 years. They may post speed gun readings on the new scoreboard in Right Field but I didn&#039;t notice them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They post the gun readings at Wrigley on boards that hang from the rafters above the upper deck on both the first base and third base side. They also show out of town scores on those boards. They&#8217;ve been there for a while, maybe 10 years. They may post speed gun readings on the new scoreboard in Right Field but I didn&#8217;t notice them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Craig, thanks for taking the time to reply.  I guess that means Terry Francona has been reading your site longer than I have!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Craig, thanks for taking the time to reply.  I guess that means Terry Francona has been reading your site longer than I have!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hittfamily</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hittfamily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I sure is nice beating up on bad teams, and playing in a division with no other .500 clubs.  Boston is in a similiar situation and has 4 wins.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure is nice beating up on bad teams, and playing in a division with no other .500 clubs.  Boston is in a similiar situation and has 4 wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Considering the home plate umpire called him out, and there isn&#039;t any rule specifying what a checked swing is, not sure why there&#039;s a controversy.  Ump called him out.  If he ran to first instead of complaining, he probably would have been safe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the home plate umpire called him out, and there isn&#8217;t any rule specifying what a checked swing is, not sure why there&#8217;s a controversy.  Ump called him out.  If he ran to first instead of complaining, he probably would have been safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beefytrout</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beefytrout]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People are really overreacting to this missed call in the Texas/Detroit game. It&#039;s not like the 27th out in Galarraga&#039;s perfect game. Texas had the bases loaded with no outs and could only manage 1 run with the help of the call, and Detroit had their mashtastic hitters coming up against Joe &quot;the anus clencher&quot; Nathan... so it&#039;s not like this call sealed the fate of the Tigers.

Both teams, at this point, are looking like pretty solid bets to head to the postseason, so a blown call on April 22 is most likely not going to affect the fabric of the space time continuum to the extent that people are suggesting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are really overreacting to this missed call in the Texas/Detroit game. It&#8217;s not like the 27th out in Galarraga&#8217;s perfect game. Texas had the bases loaded with no outs and could only manage 1 run with the help of the call, and Detroit had their mashtastic hitters coming up against Joe &#8220;the anus clencher&#8221; Nathan&#8230; so it&#8217;s not like this call sealed the fate of the Tigers.</p>
<p>Both teams, at this point, are looking like pretty solid bets to head to the postseason, so a blown call on April 22 is most likely not going to affect the fabric of the space time continuum to the extent that people are suggesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe if they called it &quot;expanded sorcery&quot; with &quot;mystical rulings&quot; coming from &quot;the man in the sky (box)&quot;....people would be more in favor of replay.  American&#039;s love superstition and appealing to higher powers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe if they called it &#8220;expanded sorcery&#8221; with &#8220;mystical rulings&#8221; coming from &#8220;the man in the sky (box)&#8221;&#8230;.people would be more in favor of replay.  American&#8217;s love superstition and appealing to higher powers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bat is across the plate.  Looks like an easy call to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bat is across the plate.  Looks like an easy call to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, their lineup was horrible last year.  All they added was one bad and one pitcher.  One bat doesn&#039;t fix a bad lineup full of old players (that are all still there and just not getting any better) and slap hitters.  Trumbo has power but shown no ability to avoid outs (even in his minor league numbers).  Kendrick was their only real offensive weapon.

Pujols, for all his greatness, is 32.  I&#039;m sure he&#039;ll improve over his start, but 32 is past prime.  He only has 3 non-intentional walks this year.  His walk rate has been declining the last few years; teams have been pitching to him and he&#039;s been expanding the zone...that has gotten worse.

Morales has never walked much; he has yet to walk this year.

It is a team with little power that doesn&#039;t get on base much.

With that lineup, they have to be carried by their pitching nearly every game....and the pitching has been struggling to dominate like everyone expected it to....they are a healthier version of the Phillies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, their lineup was horrible last year.  All they added was one bad and one pitcher.  One bat doesn&#8217;t fix a bad lineup full of old players (that are all still there and just not getting any better) and slap hitters.  Trumbo has power but shown no ability to avoid outs (even in his minor league numbers).  Kendrick was their only real offensive weapon.</p>
<p>Pujols, for all his greatness, is 32.  I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;ll improve over his start, but 32 is past prime.  He only has 3 non-intentional walks this year.  His walk rate has been declining the last few years; teams have been pitching to him and he&#8217;s been expanding the zone&#8230;that has gotten worse.</p>
<p>Morales has never walked much; he has yet to walk this year.</p>
<p>It is a team with little power that doesn&#8217;t get on base much.</p>
<p>With that lineup, they have to be carried by their pitching nearly every game&#8230;.and the pitching has been struggling to dominate like everyone expected it to&#8230;.they are a healthier version of the Phillies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgia</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[georgia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like he didn&#039;t swing at all...

I love this by the way. It&#039;s so simple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like he didn&#8217;t swing at all&#8230;</p>
<p>I love this by the way. It&#8217;s so simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiwicricket</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kiwicricket]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have seen with Rugby(Both Rugby and Rugby league) and Cricket over the past 15yrs, that things have gotten a lot smoother. In the early stages, it was a novelty, especially since entire games are almost decided on these correct outcomes. The general enthusiasm decreases for such things after time, especially after the chosen sport gets too funky with the replay business, but the general equilibrium balances out.  You end up with a useful, effective, and most importantly....quick and decisive decision making process. It takes time, but the wrinkles will iron out.

Cricket has a guy in a small booth, next to a television. When called upon, he looks at the replay on TV. Presses a green or a red light. Pretty bloody simple really.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen with Rugby(Both Rugby and Rugby league) and Cricket over the past 15yrs, that things have gotten a lot smoother. In the early stages, it was a novelty, especially since entire games are almost decided on these correct outcomes. The general enthusiasm decreases for such things after time, especially after the chosen sport gets too funky with the replay business, but the general equilibrium balances out.  You end up with a useful, effective, and most importantly&#8230;.quick and decisive decision making process. It takes time, but the wrinkles will iron out.</p>
<p>Cricket has a guy in a small booth, next to a television. When called upon, he looks at the replay on TV. Presses a green or a red light. Pretty bloody simple really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukehart80</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lukehart80]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.didbrendanryanswing.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.didbrendanryanswing.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.didbrendanryanswing.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillyphreak</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phillyphreak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does &quot;appear to have spent poorly&quot; translate to &quot;not in first place over a small portion of the season?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does &#8220;appear to have spent poorly&#8221; translate to &#8220;not in first place over a small portion of the season?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffthomasb</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeffthomasb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the beautiful &quot;Crazy Ivan&quot; reference from &#039;Red October&#039; a few months back, Craig dusts off another winner with a pull from &#039;High Fidelity.&#039; Well done. And since I didn&#039;t see him do it last year, I won&#039;t call any shenanigans.

Meanwhile, I await the inevitable Lohse return to reality. Look at his stats-- he&#039;s young Roy Hobbs in April most years, and then he metaphorically goes off to spend time in a hotel room with a woman in black around cinco de mayo. Shame he doesn&#039;t come back from that and hit the cover off the ball...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the beautiful &#8220;Crazy Ivan&#8221; reference from &#8216;Red October&#8217; a few months back, Craig dusts off another winner with a pull from &#8216;High Fidelity.&#8217; Well done. And since I didn&#8217;t see him do it last year, I won&#8217;t call any shenanigans.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I await the inevitable Lohse return to reality. Look at his stats&#8211; he&#8217;s young Roy Hobbs in April most years, and then he metaphorically goes off to spend time in a hotel room with a woman in black around cinco de mayo. Shame he doesn&#8217;t come back from that and hit the cover off the ball&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Calcaterra</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Calcaterra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All of the rainouts last year took a toll on my rain-related content so I&#039;ve decided that I can re-use some the next season. I decided that about one minute before writing the Dry The Rain bit last night.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of the rainouts last year took a toll on my rain-related content so I&#8217;ve decided that I can re-use some the next season. I decided that about one minute before writing the Dry The Rain bit last night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyetjones</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nyetjones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I love the Hi-Fidelity allusion, I&#039;m going to call shenanigans as you used &quot;Dry the Rain&quot; last year. Might I suggest ... Ann Peebles?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I love the Hi-Fidelity allusion, I&#8217;m going to call shenanigans as you used &#8220;Dry the Rain&#8221; last year. Might I suggest &#8230; Ann Peebles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Calcaterra</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Calcaterra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve actually been advocating for that for some time:

http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/04/01/for-the-1000th-time-baseball-does-not-need-fixed/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve actually been advocating for that for some time:</p>
<p><a href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/04/01/for-the-1000th-time-baseball-does-not-need-fixed/" rel="nofollow">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/04/01/for-the-1000th-time-baseball-does-not-need-fixed/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/23/and-that-happened-sundays-scores-and-highlights-65/comment-page-1/#comment-288491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141343#comment-288491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Francona actually had mentioned a decent idea yesterday.  Like many, he&#039;s concerned about the integrity of the game in how reply would be implemented but also how it would affect the tempo of game.  He suggested putting a 5th ump in a booth with access to all replays and give him the ability to page down when a call is potentially blown.  The difference from his suggestion compared to what i&#039;ve seen elsewhere is he&#039;d give the 5th ump in the booth the final and only say.  No back and forth with the umps on the field, no going ump on the field going under the hood to look at replays...just have a guy upstairs look at the screen and tell the others when they screw up and how to fix it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Francona actually had mentioned a decent idea yesterday.  Like many, he&#8217;s concerned about the integrity of the game in how reply would be implemented but also how it would affect the tempo of game.  He suggested putting a 5th ump in a booth with access to all replays and give him the ability to page down when a call is potentially blown.  The difference from his suggestion compared to what i&#8217;ve seen elsewhere is he&#8217;d give the 5th ump in the booth the final and only say.  No back and forth with the umps on the field, no going ump on the field going under the hood to look at replays&#8230;just have a guy upstairs look at the screen and tell the others when they screw up and how to fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
