<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nate Schierholtz may or may not have demanded a trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/31/nate-schierholtz-may-or-may-not-have-demanded-a-trade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/31/nate-schierholtz-may-or-may-not-have-demanded-a-trade/</link>
	<description>Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:42:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sisqsage</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/31/nate-schierholtz-may-or-may-not-have-demanded-a-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-339393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sisqsage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=188535#comment-339393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good RF. Great arm. But always prone to the 1-for-29 slump. Gents gave him plenty of chances to be the everyday guy and he flubbed it. Always seems to get that nagging injury too. Mentally weak. Also, Nate, not cool telling the media what Bochy told you in a closed door meeting. Bochy was right anyway: you are not an everyday player. A good defensive addition late in the game is the best fit. Nate the Great would be a valuable piece in a multi-player trade. Sounds like he is not happy, so they should move him for that reason alone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good RF. Great arm. But always prone to the 1-for-29 slump. Gents gave him plenty of chances to be the everyday guy and he flubbed it. Always seems to get that nagging injury too. Mentally weak. Also, Nate, not cool telling the media what Bochy told you in a closed door meeting. Bochy was right anyway: you are not an everyday player. A good defensive addition late in the game is the best fit. Nate the Great would be a valuable piece in a multi-player trade. Sounds like he is not happy, so they should move him for that reason alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
