<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A&#8217;s vs. Giants in the fight for San Jose: &#8220;We&#8217;re talking about two immoveable objects&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/</link>
	<description>Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:40:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwbmgb1218</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-345066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jwbmgb1218]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 21:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-345066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article is BS. First of all, Lew Wolf is the closest owner to Frank Mccourt, low budget and getting money from other owners...Secondly the Giants are paying for their stadium,  A&#039;s are using tax- payer money..Giants have a right to protect their investment, and Three...Haas did give San Jose BACK to Giants in the 90&#039;s. Horace Stoneham took the risk to bring the Giants to the Bay Area and had the entire Bay Area..he thought. That was until Mr. Finley took over part of his base. How many times are the A&#039;s going to infringe on Giants territiry? 

What Wolf does have, however, is a FRAT BROTHER as Commish.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is BS. First of all, Lew Wolf is the closest owner to Frank Mccourt, low budget and getting money from other owners&#8230;Secondly the Giants are paying for their stadium,  A&#8217;s are using tax- payer money..Giants have a right to protect their investment, and Three&#8230;Haas did give San Jose BACK to Giants in the 90&#8242;s. Horace Stoneham took the risk to bring the Giants to the Bay Area and had the entire Bay Area..he thought. That was until Mr. Finley took over part of his base. How many times are the A&#8217;s going to infringe on Giants territiry? </p>
<p>What Wolf does have, however, is a FRAT BROTHER as Commish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Preston</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-345059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry Preston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 21:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-345059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A&#039;s to San Jose is not Bud Selig&#039;s personal call.  A supermajority of owners would have to approve it. Selig&#039;s not going to make a recommendation for a move unless he has the votes to approve already n hand. The Giants&#039; best defense is that owners don&#039;t like to vote against their brethren in commerce.  If it&#039;s the Giants today, it&#039;ll be me tomorrow, they likely feel.  The Giants also have little to sue over.  Territorial rights are granted, not entitled.  The MLB giveth and it can take away, however unlikely that is.

The A&#039;s don&#039;t lose money in Oakland.  They can limp along on MLB&#039;s revenue sharing checks for some time.  I see Selig stalling for time, hoping an opening for another option opens up, either a stadium in Oakland or a move somewhere else.  This is just going to drag on and on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A&#8217;s to San Jose is not Bud Selig&#8217;s personal call.  A supermajority of owners would have to approve it. Selig&#8217;s not going to make a recommendation for a move unless he has the votes to approve already n hand. The Giants&#8217; best defense is that owners don&#8217;t like to vote against their brethren in commerce.  If it&#8217;s the Giants today, it&#8217;ll be me tomorrow, they likely feel.  The Giants also have little to sue over.  Territorial rights are granted, not entitled.  The MLB giveth and it can take away, however unlikely that is.</p>
<p>The A&#8217;s don&#8217;t lose money in Oakland.  They can limp along on MLB&#8217;s revenue sharing checks for some time.  I see Selig stalling for time, hoping an opening for another option opens up, either a stadium in Oakland or a move somewhere else.  This is just going to drag on and on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkcalhoun</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jkcalhoun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do we have reason to expect Wolff to significantly increase payroll or marketing efforts? Perhaps the best answer is: once a Loria, always a Loria.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we have reason to expect Wolff to significantly increase payroll or marketing efforts? Perhaps the best answer is: once a Loria, always a Loria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkcalhoun</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jkcalhoun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The upside here is that even if Oakland is untenable and the A&#039;s have to move out of the Bay Area, the team that really gets this guy&#039;s blood moving will still be right here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The upside here is that even if Oakland is untenable and the A&#8217;s have to move out of the Bay Area, the team that really gets this guy&#8217;s blood moving will still be right here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkcalhoun</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jkcalhoun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do the tax-paying citizens of the Bay Area have to do with it? Bay Area voters regularly reject -- and rightfully so -- publicly financed stadiums for privately held sports teams. If the taxpayers decide they want to foot the bill for a new palace for the A&#039;s somewhere within their territory, I&#039;m sure things can be worked out. How about it, Walnut Creek? Are you in, Concord?

For what it&#039;s worth, Bud has already delivered the decision you&#039;re asking for. In May he said it was up to Lew Wolff, subject to the normal approval process, for the A&#039;s to move out of Oakland. In other words, the commissioner is not standing in the way. The hold-up, of course, is that Lew Wolff is interested in moving the A&#039;s only to San Jose, which has the major inconvenience of being located within the territory of another major league franchise. He may as well as set his sights on a location further along Yawkey Way, or maybe just up Waveland Avenue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do the tax-paying citizens of the Bay Area have to do with it? Bay Area voters regularly reject &#8212; and rightfully so &#8212; publicly financed stadiums for privately held sports teams. If the taxpayers decide they want to foot the bill for a new palace for the A&#8217;s somewhere within their territory, I&#8217;m sure things can be worked out. How about it, Walnut Creek? Are you in, Concord?</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, Bud has already delivered the decision you&#8217;re asking for. In May he said it was up to Lew Wolff, subject to the normal approval process, for the A&#8217;s to move out of Oakland. In other words, the commissioner is not standing in the way. The hold-up, of course, is that Lew Wolff is interested in moving the A&#8217;s only to San Jose, which has the major inconvenience of being located within the territory of another major league franchise. He may as well as set his sights on a location further along Yawkey Way, or maybe just up Waveland Avenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkcalhoun</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jkcalhoun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The A’s had the T-rights for San Jose then.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As I mentioned earlier (but below), this isn&#039;t true. Here&#039;s an &lt;a href=&quot;http://travel.nytimes.com/2012/04/02/sports/baseball/as-and-giants-in-tug-of-war-over-rights-to-san-jose.html?pagewanted=all&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;informative and well-focused article on the history of the territorial rights in the area&lt;/a&gt; from the New York Times, published this April. It makes clear the fact that no territorial rights to San Jose were assigned prior to 1990.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The A’s had the T-rights for San Jose then.</p></blockquote>
<p>As I mentioned earlier (but below), this isn&#8217;t true. Here&#8217;s an <a href="http://travel.nytimes.com/2012/04/02/sports/baseball/as-and-giants-in-tug-of-war-over-rights-to-san-jose.html?pagewanted=all" rel="nofollow">informative and well-focused article on the history of the territorial rights in the area</a> from the New York Times, published this April. It makes clear the fact that no territorial rights to San Jose were assigned prior to 1990.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seannyz89</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[seannyz89]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 05:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the early 90&#039;s when the Giants were on the verge of moving the team to Tampa, Mr Haas relinquished the rights to SJ to save the Giants and keep them here in the Bay Area because it was the best thing for baseball. The Giants are a classless orginization along with their bandwagon fans. Giants fans act like they are so loyal. Laughable at best. Candlestick was a shithole and before the Raiders came back, the Coliseum was actually a nice park. The A&#039;s constantly outdrew the Giants until they built At&amp;T park. Fuck the Giants and their pansyass fans!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the early 90&#8242;s when the Giants were on the verge of moving the team to Tampa, Mr Haas relinquished the rights to SJ to save the Giants and keep them here in the Bay Area because it was the best thing for baseball. The Giants are a classless orginization along with their bandwagon fans. Giants fans act like they are so loyal. Laughable at best. Candlestick was a shithole and before the Raiders came back, the Coliseum was actually a nice park. The A&#8217;s constantly outdrew the Giants until they built At&amp;T park. Fuck the Giants and their pansyass fans!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: athleticsdiehard</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[athleticsdiehard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 04:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is time to address the taboo subject of...... Oakland, CA.
As I drove through downtown Oakland this afternoon, I was greeted by massive graffiti, thugs walking around with no jobs and an overall feeling of Blight and Despair.

Oakland is about as ghetto as Detroit, Baltimore and New Orleans.  The &quot;Occupy&quot; protesters in Oakland are violent and the Mayor of Oakland endorses these criminals.

The Oakland Coliseum is a perfect monument to the Welfare piece of trash city that we call.... Oakland.

Enough is enough Bud Selig!  I am a lifelong, Diehard A&#039;s Fan and am sick and tired of your indecision.  Selig was the commissioner that once wondered if the baseballs were &quot;juiced&quot; and even toured the facility where the baseballs are made.  This whole time, we all knew that it was the massive giant-looking PLAYERS THAT WERE JUICING.  It is time for the MLB Owners to call for a vote of no-confidence of Bud Selig and replace him with a REAL MAN THAT WILL GIVE THE A&#039;s A YES OR NO.

This hellhole of Blight and Crime that we call Oakland is getting what it deserves!  The Warriors are moving, the Raiders (if they have any sense) will move to either Santa Clara or Los Angeles and the A&#039;s want to move.  Nobody even feels safe staying at one of the hotels near the Oakland Airport.  When you gas up your car on Hegenberger, you are often met by scary-looking lazy men that refuse to work and would rather beg you for money.

I know that thousands of good, honest, tax-paying citizens of the Bay Area agree with me, MOVE THE A&#039;s OUT OF OAKLAND... NOW!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is time to address the taboo subject of&#8230;&#8230; Oakland, CA.<br />
As I drove through downtown Oakland this afternoon, I was greeted by massive graffiti, thugs walking around with no jobs and an overall feeling of Blight and Despair.</p>
<p>Oakland is about as ghetto as Detroit, Baltimore and New Orleans.  The &#8220;Occupy&#8221; protesters in Oakland are violent and the Mayor of Oakland endorses these criminals.</p>
<p>The Oakland Coliseum is a perfect monument to the Welfare piece of trash city that we call&#8230;. Oakland.</p>
<p>Enough is enough Bud Selig!  I am a lifelong, Diehard A&#8217;s Fan and am sick and tired of your indecision.  Selig was the commissioner that once wondered if the baseballs were &#8220;juiced&#8221; and even toured the facility where the baseballs are made.  This whole time, we all knew that it was the massive giant-looking PLAYERS THAT WERE JUICING.  It is time for the MLB Owners to call for a vote of no-confidence of Bud Selig and replace him with a REAL MAN THAT WILL GIVE THE A&#8217;s A YES OR NO.</p>
<p>This hellhole of Blight and Crime that we call Oakland is getting what it deserves!  The Warriors are moving, the Raiders (if they have any sense) will move to either Santa Clara or Los Angeles and the A&#8217;s want to move.  Nobody even feels safe staying at one of the hotels near the Oakland Airport.  When you gas up your car on Hegenberger, you are often met by scary-looking lazy men that refuse to work and would rather beg you for money.</p>
<p>I know that thousands of good, honest, tax-paying citizens of the Bay Area agree with me, MOVE THE A&#8217;s OUT OF OAKLAND&#8230; NOW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seeingwhatsticks</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[seeingwhatsticks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 02:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny, I&#039;ve actually tried to make the same point in the past.  The A&#039;s in San Jose compare favorably to the Padres in San Diego: new stadium, cities are roughly the same size, and while the Bay Area as a whole is a larger media market than San Diego San Jose isn&#039;t a central location for a lot of people and the Padres don&#039;t share the market with another team.  The Padres are basically at the same level the A&#039;s are now in terms of salary and I&#039;d say they have an equal or possibly better situation than the A&#039;s would have in San Jose (obviously tech money, if it abandoned the Giants and embraced the A&#039;s could be the great equalizer but I digress). 

Plus, given the history of the A&#039;s under Wolff and before, do we have any reason to expect Wolff to significantly increase payroll or marketing efforts?  Or will he just take the extra profits and put them directly in his own pocket?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I&#8217;ve actually tried to make the same point in the past.  The A&#8217;s in San Jose compare favorably to the Padres in San Diego: new stadium, cities are roughly the same size, and while the Bay Area as a whole is a larger media market than San Diego San Jose isn&#8217;t a central location for a lot of people and the Padres don&#8217;t share the market with another team.  The Padres are basically at the same level the A&#8217;s are now in terms of salary and I&#8217;d say they have an equal or possibly better situation than the A&#8217;s would have in San Jose (obviously tech money, if it abandoned the Giants and embraced the A&#8217;s could be the great equalizer but I digress). </p>
<p>Plus, given the history of the A&#8217;s under Wolff and before, do we have any reason to expect Wolff to significantly increase payroll or marketing efforts?  Or will he just take the extra profits and put them directly in his own pocket?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkcalhoun</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jkcalhoun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing we agree on: Lew Wolff is the right target for the A&#039;s fan&#039;s ire, not the Giants.

They should be wary of what they wish for: it&#039;s quite possible for a move to San Jose to benefit Wolff, a major real estate developer in the South Bay, without resulting in a revenue stream that allows them to compete any more readily than they have done in the recent past, depending on what it takes for them to settle the matter of territorial rights with the Giants. Joining the NBA effectively cost the Nets Julius Erving -- would the A&#039;s be similarly hamstrung in order to pay off the Giants for the valuable South Bay territory? After watching him cry poor in Oakland for years, I wouldn&#039;t take it on faith that Wolff has the A&#039;s fans&#039; interests in mind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing we agree on: Lew Wolff is the right target for the A&#8217;s fan&#8217;s ire, not the Giants.</p>
<p>They should be wary of what they wish for: it&#8217;s quite possible for a move to San Jose to benefit Wolff, a major real estate developer in the South Bay, without resulting in a revenue stream that allows them to compete any more readily than they have done in the recent past, depending on what it takes for them to settle the matter of territorial rights with the Giants. Joining the NBA effectively cost the Nets Julius Erving &#8212; would the A&#8217;s be similarly hamstrung in order to pay off the Giants for the valuable South Bay territory? After watching him cry poor in Oakland for years, I wouldn&#8217;t take it on faith that Wolff has the A&#8217;s fans&#8217; interests in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seeingwhatsticks</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[seeingwhatsticks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 21:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think a new stadium in a central location (aka nowhere near the current one) would be a huge boost for revitalizing Oakland, a city which has some really cool up and coming areas despite the city&#039;s best efforts to be terrible at everything.  I also hate to see teams move even when they aren&#039;t leaving the area so as a traditionalist I&#039;d love to see the A&#039;s stay in Oakland (I also hate seeing the 49ers move to Santa Clara rather than finding a location in San Francisco).

I guess where we disagree is on what Haas did 25 years ago.  What you see as magnanimous I see as shortsighted and stupid.  Haas could have (and should have) put all kinds of requirements and restrictions into the deal to cede the territory to the Giants but he didn&#039;t.  Tomato tomahto I guess.

What I&#039;m sure we can both agree on is that Lew Wolff knew all of this when he bought the team.  He knew the Giants owned the South Bay.  He knew the A&#039;s needed a new ballpark.  He knew that if he wanted to move this fight was coming, yet he bought the team and cried poor and unfair anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a new stadium in a central location (aka nowhere near the current one) would be a huge boost for revitalizing Oakland, a city which has some really cool up and coming areas despite the city&#8217;s best efforts to be terrible at everything.  I also hate to see teams move even when they aren&#8217;t leaving the area so as a traditionalist I&#8217;d love to see the A&#8217;s stay in Oakland (I also hate seeing the 49ers move to Santa Clara rather than finding a location in San Francisco).</p>
<p>I guess where we disagree is on what Haas did 25 years ago.  What you see as magnanimous I see as shortsighted and stupid.  Haas could have (and should have) put all kinds of requirements and restrictions into the deal to cede the territory to the Giants but he didn&#8217;t.  Tomato tomahto I guess.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m sure we can both agree on is that Lew Wolff knew all of this when he bought the team.  He knew the Giants owned the South Bay.  He knew the A&#8217;s needed a new ballpark.  He knew that if he wanted to move this fight was coming, yet he bought the team and cried poor and unfair anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seeingwhatsticks</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[seeingwhatsticks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 21:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[clydserra,

As I said in another comment that&#039;s exactly what the A&#039;s did: gave up the South Bay so that they&#039;d get fans from San Francisco taking BART to Oakland rather than driving down to Santa Clara.  The decision by the A&#039;s was a calculated business decision that backfired, not, as many would have you believe, a charitable act that was made purely for &quot;the best interests of the game.&quot;  I&#039;m not sure I&#039;ve seen anyone make a compelling argument for why the Giants should be responsible for fixing a mistake the A&#039;s made 25 years ago.  

And I think the fact that the Giants invested in and developed a loyal following in the South Bay is very relevant.  They put in the time and the money and rely on the fans and money coming up north.  What have the A&#039;s done to earn the fans and the support and why should it just be handed to them?  Because they decided that Oakland can&#039;t work and it&#039;s not even worth trying?  Lew Wolff has done to Oakland almost exactly what Loria did to Montreal and the only reason Lew&#039;s not equally reviled is that he was at least smart enough not to be so openly dickish about it (and his college pal is Bud Selig).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>clydserra,</p>
<p>As I said in another comment that&#8217;s exactly what the A&#8217;s did: gave up the South Bay so that they&#8217;d get fans from San Francisco taking BART to Oakland rather than driving down to Santa Clara.  The decision by the A&#8217;s was a calculated business decision that backfired, not, as many would have you believe, a charitable act that was made purely for &#8220;the best interests of the game.&#8221;  I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ve seen anyone make a compelling argument for why the Giants should be responsible for fixing a mistake the A&#8217;s made 25 years ago.  </p>
<p>And I think the fact that the Giants invested in and developed a loyal following in the South Bay is very relevant.  They put in the time and the money and rely on the fans and money coming up north.  What have the A&#8217;s done to earn the fans and the support and why should it just be handed to them?  Because they decided that Oakland can&#8217;t work and it&#8217;s not even worth trying?  Lew Wolff has done to Oakland almost exactly what Loria did to Montreal and the only reason Lew&#8217;s not equally reviled is that he was at least smart enough not to be so openly dickish about it (and his college pal is Bud Selig).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quintjs</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[quintjs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 20:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben, this is probably why MLB wants to move the A&#039;s to SJ - to punish the Giants for not spending taxpayer dollars.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, this is probably why MLB wants to move the A&#8217;s to SJ &#8211; to punish the Giants for not spending taxpayer dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clydeserra</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clydeserra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sjbryce, that&#039;s what my fellow under 10,000 have been doing. Going to the games. Its nice, there is always seats, and cheap.

the problem, as was with candlestick, is the casual fan, who don&#039;t show up because the stadium is unappealing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sjbryce, that&#8217;s what my fellow under 10,000 have been doing. Going to the games. Its nice, there is always seats, and cheap.</p>
<p>the problem, as was with candlestick, is the casual fan, who don&#8217;t show up because the stadium is unappealing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pipkin42</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pipkin42]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I live in Santa Clara County - People down here love the Sharks. You see &quot;Sharks Country&quot; stuff all the time. I bet the same thing would happen with a San Jose baseball team.

The more pressing concern for us Santa Clara County residents, though, is that with the 49ers moving to Santa Clara, do we want all these damn sports teams overloading the already terrible public transit system down here? I, as a fan of East Coast teams, do not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in Santa Clara County &#8211; People down here love the Sharks. You see &#8220;Sharks Country&#8221; stuff all the time. I bet the same thing would happen with a San Jose baseball team.</p>
<p>The more pressing concern for us Santa Clara County residents, though, is that with the 49ers moving to Santa Clara, do we want all these damn sports teams overloading the already terrible public transit system down here? I, as a fan of East Coast teams, do not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sjbryce</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344323</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sjbryce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This whole thing is pretty ridiculous. First off, I am a Giants fan but I am in favor of the A&#039;s moving to San Jose. I think that&#039;s what is in the best interest of baseball. It doesn&#039;t mean that I&#039;m going to become an A&#039;s fan just because they are now closer to me. But I do see the Giants point. I know the A&#039;s gave up the rights to San Jose when the Giants were going to move to St Petersburg. That was a bad move on the A&#039;s part. The Fiants aren&#039;t dumb enough to make that same mistake. 
Now what pisses me off is that all these &quot;A&#039;s fans&quot; wanna bash the Giants for not allowing them to move. If you guys are all such diehards, go support your team at the games even though the stadium sucks. That&#039;s what a diehard fan does. I know there are still some of them out there and I commend them. But all these people that say they aren&#039;t going because of the crappy stadium aren&#039;t true fans. They also wanna talk about the &quot;corporate Giants fans&quot; that are always at the park. Wait till you get a new stadium. It happens to all fan bases.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole thing is pretty ridiculous. First off, I am a Giants fan but I am in favor of the A&#8217;s moving to San Jose. I think that&#8217;s what is in the best interest of baseball. It doesn&#8217;t mean that I&#8217;m going to become an A&#8217;s fan just because they are now closer to me. But I do see the Giants point. I know the A&#8217;s gave up the rights to San Jose when the Giants were going to move to St Petersburg. That was a bad move on the A&#8217;s part. The Fiants aren&#8217;t dumb enough to make that same mistake.<br />
Now what pisses me off is that all these &#8220;A&#8217;s fans&#8221; wanna bash the Giants for not allowing them to move. If you guys are all such diehards, go support your team at the games even though the stadium sucks. That&#8217;s what a diehard fan does. I know there are still some of them out there and I commend them. But all these people that say they aren&#8217;t going because of the crappy stadium aren&#8217;t true fans. They also wanna talk about the &#8220;corporate Giants fans&#8221; that are always at the park. Wait till you get a new stadium. It happens to all fan bases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clydeserra</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clydeserra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How are the A&#039;s in bad shape? They have a competitive team that was last in the playoffs 6 years ago. Two years ago they were .500, this year much better. 

they have made money for their ownership group. Attendance did bottom out, but, as I recall, it was up last year and is up again this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How are the A&#8217;s in bad shape? They have a competitive team that was last in the playoffs 6 years ago. Two years ago they were .500, this year much better. </p>
<p>they have made money for their ownership group. Attendance did bottom out, but, as I recall, it was up last year and is up again this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clydeserra</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clydeserra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;selling out the Coliseum&quot;

Hardly. Doing better than now, yes, but still in the lower tier as far as overall attendance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;selling out the Coliseum&#8221;</p>
<p>Hardly. Doing better than now, yes, but still in the lower tier as far as overall attendance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clydeserra</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clydeserra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with a lot of this, but I don&#039;t think the Giants ownership actually put much weight into the sale price. I think that is a clever way to frame it now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with a lot of this, but I don&#8217;t think the Giants ownership actually put much weight into the sale price. I think that is a clever way to frame it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: humanexcrement</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[humanexcrement]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lost in all of this is that the Giants are indirectly part of the reason the A&#039;s are in such bad shape.  They got their brand new beautiful stadium and had Barry Bonds breaking Hank Aaron&#039;s record while A&#039;s fans got to sit in that ugly, cavernous dump of a stadium watching a punchless also-ran try to eke out victories by taking walks.  A good number of fans wisely made the trip across the bay.  Now all the A&#039;s want is their own nice stadium in a better part of California.  For those of us who grew up with the Oakland A&#039;s being one of the most fascinating teams in baseball, it&#039;s really sad to see this team rot, and it would be really good to see them thrive again.  And &quot;San Jose Athletics&quot; sounds pretty cool to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lost in all of this is that the Giants are indirectly part of the reason the A&#8217;s are in such bad shape.  They got their brand new beautiful stadium and had Barry Bonds breaking Hank Aaron&#8217;s record while A&#8217;s fans got to sit in that ugly, cavernous dump of a stadium watching a punchless also-ran try to eke out victories by taking walks.  A good number of fans wisely made the trip across the bay.  Now all the A&#8217;s want is their own nice stadium in a better part of California.  For those of us who grew up with the Oakland A&#8217;s being one of the most fascinating teams in baseball, it&#8217;s really sad to see this team rot, and it would be really good to see them thrive again.  And &#8220;San Jose Athletics&#8221; sounds pretty cool to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clydeserra</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clydeserra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[seeingwhatsticks:  there are plenty of reasons that the giants don&#039;t want the A&#039;s in SJ. But because they invested heavily there before silicon valley was Silicon Valley is not one of them. The A&#039;s had the T-rights for San Jose then. 

They were given to the giants &quot;for Free&quot; in hopes that the giants would mover there, and I suspect in hopes that they A&#039;s could then grab the attention of the newly abandoned Downtown SF $.

I don&#039;t know, maybe someone does, do territorial rights limit the way you can market your team? Can the A&#039;s put up billboards in the giant&#039;s territory without a waiver?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seeingwhatsticks:  there are plenty of reasons that the giants don&#8217;t want the A&#8217;s in SJ. But because they invested heavily there before silicon valley was Silicon Valley is not one of them. The A&#8217;s had the T-rights for San Jose then. </p>
<p>They were given to the giants &#8220;for Free&#8221; in hopes that the giants would mover there, and I suspect in hopes that they A&#8217;s could then grab the attention of the newly abandoned Downtown SF $.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, maybe someone does, do territorial rights limit the way you can market your team? Can the A&#8217;s put up billboards in the giant&#8217;s territory without a waiver?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkcalhoun</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jkcalhoun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The retrospective work cited in your post says nothing at all about Haas&#039; view of the value of Santa Clara or the South Bay to the A&#039;s franchise. My evidence that he rated its value as low is based on the cultural status quo; the area has always identified itself much more closely with San Francisco and the Peninsula, and the Giants have always had a much stronger following there than the A&#039;s. Do you have evidence that the A&#039;s had made a promotional push to alter that?

Whatever his assessment of its value, please don&#039;t get me wrong: because Haas had leverage in the situation and could probably have extracted some kind of concession from MLB even if what he was &quot;giving up&quot; was of little direct value to the A&#039;s, I agree that his &quot;mentality&quot; in that transaction was unselfish.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The retrospective work cited in your post says nothing at all about Haas&#8217; view of the value of Santa Clara or the South Bay to the A&#8217;s franchise. My evidence that he rated its value as low is based on the cultural status quo; the area has always identified itself much more closely with San Francisco and the Peninsula, and the Giants have always had a much stronger following there than the A&#8217;s. Do you have evidence that the A&#8217;s had made a promotional push to alter that?</p>
<p>Whatever his assessment of its value, please don&#8217;t get me wrong: because Haas had leverage in the situation and could probably have extracted some kind of concession from MLB even if what he was &#8220;giving up&#8221; was of little direct value to the A&#8217;s, I agree that his &#8220;mentality&#8221; in that transaction was unselfish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seeingwhatsticks</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[seeingwhatsticks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One other thing I should add: the sale of the Dodgers for $2 billion this year did nothing to convince the Giants to relent on this issue.  They know they&#039;re going to need every available dollar to compete with the Dodgers going forward.  As a fan I&#039;ve always wanted them to set their sights on the Yankees, Sox, and Phillies but that&#039;s just not this ownership groupu&#039;s style.  Having a potential juggernaut in their backyard though is a totally different issue for ownership.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other thing I should add: the sale of the Dodgers for $2 billion this year did nothing to convince the Giants to relent on this issue.  They know they&#8217;re going to need every available dollar to compete with the Dodgers going forward.  As a fan I&#8217;ve always wanted them to set their sights on the Yankees, Sox, and Phillies but that&#8217;s just not this ownership groupu&#8217;s style.  Having a potential juggernaut in their backyard though is a totally different issue for ownership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkcalhoun</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jkcalhoun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, the A&#039;s stood to gain a greater following from portions of the Bay Area if the Giants had moved to the South Bay. But it&#039;s nonetheless significant that he allowed the assignment territorial rights to occur without condition. He could have leveraged his position by demanding that portions of the Giants operating area be reassigned to the A&#039;s after the move had been accomplished or, if the Giants ultimately built a new ballpark or signed a new lease somewhere other than in the South Bay, that the rights to Santa Clara County revert to their previous unassigned status. Nothing like that occurred, and that&#039;s why I think it&#039;s very appropriate to consider his gesture magnanimous.

This does not mean that I think the Giants, on the basis of &quot;morality&quot; or any other basis, are bound to cede their rights now in order to effect a similar magnanimity. Because that wouldn&#039;t be magnanimity; that would be stupidity. It would result in two franchises with a weak outlook where there was previously only one. A&#039;s fans hate the Giants ownership now? Just think of how much more they&#039;ll hate them if they&#039;re fighting tooth and nail for the same resources in the same corner of the Bay, while for a significant period owing the Giants a good chunk of their revenue according to whatever settlement MLB imposes. My advice: get your owner to sell, A&#039;s fans, to someone who&#039;s willing to make a go of it where you already are. Nobody opposes that except the A&#039;s current ownership.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the A&#8217;s stood to gain a greater following from portions of the Bay Area if the Giants had moved to the South Bay. But it&#8217;s nonetheless significant that he allowed the assignment territorial rights to occur without condition. He could have leveraged his position by demanding that portions of the Giants operating area be reassigned to the A&#8217;s after the move had been accomplished or, if the Giants ultimately built a new ballpark or signed a new lease somewhere other than in the South Bay, that the rights to Santa Clara County revert to their previous unassigned status. Nothing like that occurred, and that&#8217;s why I think it&#8217;s very appropriate to consider his gesture magnanimous.</p>
<p>This does not mean that I think the Giants, on the basis of &#8220;morality&#8221; or any other basis, are bound to cede their rights now in order to effect a similar magnanimity. Because that wouldn&#8217;t be magnanimity; that would be stupidity. It would result in two franchises with a weak outlook where there was previously only one. A&#8217;s fans hate the Giants ownership now? Just think of how much more they&#8217;ll hate them if they&#8217;re fighting tooth and nail for the same resources in the same corner of the Bay, while for a significant period owing the Giants a good chunk of their revenue according to whatever settlement MLB imposes. My advice: get your owner to sell, A&#8217;s fans, to someone who&#8217;s willing to make a go of it where you already are. Nobody opposes that except the A&#8217;s current ownership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seeingwhatsticks</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[seeingwhatsticks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think the change would be immediate but I could see it over time as generations pass and kids grow up with the A&#039;s in their backyard.  Again, the Giants have invested heavily in the South Bay going back to the days before silicon valley was Silicon Valley.  Why shouldn&#039;t they reap the benefits and rewards of that investment?  Why should the A&#039;s be rewarded for making no effort to succeed in Oakland?  All I keep hearing is that it&#039;s unfair for the A&#039;s yet no one seems to want to deal with the fact that the A&#039;s have played a huge part in creating their current situation.

There&#039;s no doubt the big loser in this whole mess is the city of San Jose.  The problem is there are 3 cities and only 2 teams so someone is going to be left unhappy.  If there&#039;s a way to make San Francisco, Oakland, and San Jose all happy then I&#039;m all ears.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the change would be immediate but I could see it over time as generations pass and kids grow up with the A&#8217;s in their backyard.  Again, the Giants have invested heavily in the South Bay going back to the days before silicon valley was Silicon Valley.  Why shouldn&#8217;t they reap the benefits and rewards of that investment?  Why should the A&#8217;s be rewarded for making no effort to succeed in Oakland?  All I keep hearing is that it&#8217;s unfair for the A&#8217;s yet no one seems to want to deal with the fact that the A&#8217;s have played a huge part in creating their current situation.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no doubt the big loser in this whole mess is the city of San Jose.  The problem is there are 3 cities and only 2 teams so someone is going to be left unhappy.  If there&#8217;s a way to make San Francisco, Oakland, and San Jose all happy then I&#8217;m all ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: APBA Guy</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APBA Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You present zero evidence for your assertion that Haas assessed Santa Clara County as having little value. On the other hand, the retrospective work cited in my post makes clear that Haas saw value in Santa Clara but ceded the rights anyway.

As I said in my comment, some will find the Giants intransigence acceptable based as it is on the winner-take-all mentality pervasive today in American business. 

My point is that Haas didn&#039;t act with that mentality. Far from it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You present zero evidence for your assertion that Haas assessed Santa Clara County as having little value. On the other hand, the retrospective work cited in my post makes clear that Haas saw value in Santa Clara but ceded the rights anyway.</p>
<p>As I said in my comment, some will find the Giants intransigence acceptable based as it is on the winner-take-all mentality pervasive today in American business. </p>
<p>My point is that Haas didn&#8217;t act with that mentality. Far from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevinbnyc</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevinbnyc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see a lot of unfair criticism for the commissioner here. 
Mr. Selig and other MLB executives have carefully listened to the fans, and they know there is no appetite for baseball in San Jose. 
Just like nobody wants instant replay.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see a lot of unfair criticism for the commissioner here.<br />
Mr. Selig and other MLB executives have carefully listened to the fans, and they know there is no appetite for baseball in San Jose.<br />
Just like nobody wants instant replay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hcf95688</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hcf95688]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...and no one would force all those alleged Giants fans to suddenly become fans of the Green &amp; Gold.  If they&#039;re the Giants die-hards that you (and the media and the Giants) claim they are, why would they switch?  What are the Giants afraid of?  Let teh people decide!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and no one would force all those alleged Giants fans to suddenly become fans of the Green &amp; Gold.  If they&#8217;re the Giants die-hards that you (and the media and the Giants) claim they are, why would they switch?  What are the Giants afraid of?  Let teh people decide!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seeingwhatsticks</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344241</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[seeingwhatsticks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No one is saying people in the South Bay can&#039;t be A&#039;s fans, it just so happens that going back decades they&#039;ve been primarily Giants fans.  Why should the Giants willingly give that up for the good of the A&#039;s?  It&#039;s not like the A&#039;s are doing anything to try and lure South Bay residents to Oakland.  One team in the Bay Area spends a lot of time courting the South Bay and reaping the benefits while the other whines and cries about how unfair their situation is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one is saying people in the South Bay can&#8217;t be A&#8217;s fans, it just so happens that going back decades they&#8217;ve been primarily Giants fans.  Why should the Giants willingly give that up for the good of the A&#8217;s?  It&#8217;s not like the A&#8217;s are doing anything to try and lure South Bay residents to Oakland.  One team in the Bay Area spends a lot of time courting the South Bay and reaping the benefits while the other whines and cries about how unfair their situation is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigleagues</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/09/as-vs-giants-in-the-fight-for-san-jose-were-talking-about-two-immoveable-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-344237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigleagues]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=190288#comment-344237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, let&#039;s be honest, unless your owner is a guy like Frank McCourt - no franchise can &#039;die on the vine&#039; under MLB&#039;s current economics. 

Yet a team can find itself in an environment where it cannot flourish . . . which is the problem that the A&#039;s have been enduring for the past 30 or so years.

Again, I will say this . . . it&#039;s clear as pie to me that the Giants have no intention of doing anything, unless the A&#039;s somehow gain MLB approval to move to San Jose without their (Giants) consent. The Giants clearly support the status quo and likely hope to force the A&#039;s to move out of the Bay Area altogether - that way it&#039;s ALL theirs.

This is all market strategy now folks, nothing more, nothing less.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, let&#8217;s be honest, unless your owner is a guy like Frank McCourt &#8211; no franchise can &#8216;die on the vine&#8217; under MLB&#8217;s current economics. </p>
<p>Yet a team can find itself in an environment where it cannot flourish . . . which is the problem that the A&#8217;s have been enduring for the past 30 or so years.</p>
<p>Again, I will say this . . . it&#8217;s clear as pie to me that the Giants have no intention of doing anything, unless the A&#8217;s somehow gain MLB approval to move to San Jose without their (Giants) consent. The Giants clearly support the status quo and likely hope to force the A&#8217;s to move out of the Bay Area altogether &#8211; that way it&#8217;s ALL theirs.</p>
<p>This is all market strategy now folks, nothing more, nothing less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
