Skip to content

The Blue Jays sign Maicer Izturis to a three-year, $10 million deal

Nov 8, 2012, 1:31 PM EDT

Maicer Izturis Reuters Reuters

Jon Heyman reports that the Blue Jays have signed Maicer Izturis to a three-year, $10 million deal. There is a team option for a fourth year.

Izturis was not an offensive juggernaut for the Angels in 2012, hitting a mere .256/.320/.315 with two homers in 319 plate appearances. But he’s versatile — he can play short, second and third — and can be a reliable utility guy who, unlike a lot of utility guys, can start for extended periods if injuries occur. And at $3.3 million a year, he’s not breaking the bank.
Decent signing, I’d say.
  1. cur68 - Nov 8, 2012 at 1:40 PM

    This concludes your Omar Vizquel-type-of-guy signing. Next can we get a John Maddon-type-of-guy signing, please?

    • Francisco (FC) - Nov 8, 2012 at 1:48 PM

      I was going to say that. The Blue Jays just filled in their obligatory Venezuelan Utility Man Roster Spot.

    • proudlycanadian - Nov 8, 2012 at 4:02 PM

      In his column this morning, Shi Davidi of Sportsnet, wrote that the Jays were close to signing a middle infielder with MLB experience. I am quite sure that he actually knew who it was, but had promised not to disclose the name in advance.

  2. jaysfan64 - Nov 8, 2012 at 1:47 PM

    I’d settle for a Torii Hunter-type of guy…

  3. paint771 - Nov 8, 2012 at 1:58 PM

    It is a decent signing, but sadly I think you overestimate the Jays roster when you call him a utility guy. He’s the starting second baseman for the Jays in all likelihood, although may split time with Heck later in the year.

  4. paperlions - Nov 8, 2012 at 2:10 PM

    I don’t get the 3 years. Why sign a 32 yr old utility guy that can’t hit for 3 years?

    • missthemexpos - Nov 8, 2012 at 2:24 PM

      The 3rd year was needed to seal the deal.

      • paperlions - Nov 8, 2012 at 2:30 PM

        Then don’t do it. He’s not that good a fielder (really only proficient at 2B) and he can’t hit….the Jays probably have guys like that in AAA that will play for the minimum.

  5. paint771 - Nov 8, 2012 at 2:27 PM

    More details: It is a three year, $9 million deal with a club option for a fourth $3 million year. The Jays also made a trade with KC, sending cash in exchange for RHP Jeremy Jeffress, who could project to be a power arm in the pen if he ever gets his sh*t together, both in terms of control and not-getting-arrested.

    Actually, both seem like pretty good moves, although very much in the AA vein of late of favoring controllability (not a word often used with Jeffress) and low risk, low reward signings. In fact, it’s AA’s first free agent signing over two years. Practically counts as a splashy signing with him.

    • jaysjunkie - Nov 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM

      “…favoring controllability (not a word often used with Jeffress)”.

      Nicely done there.

  6. Detroit Michael - Nov 8, 2012 at 4:53 PM

    The Jays would have been better off, in my opinion, to keep Mike Aviles at lower price with a 1-year commitment. The difference in quality between Aviles and M. Izturis isn’t this large.

  7. scatterbrian - Nov 8, 2012 at 4:53 PM

    Izturis: 2913 PA, .273/.337/.381, 94 OPS+, .318/94 wOBA/wRC+, 13.5 fWAR (-10.2 bat/15.6 field/19.1 run)
    Scutaro: 4926 PA, .276/.340/.391, 94 OPS+, .324/99 wOBA/wRC+, 18.3 fWAR (-13.0 bat/-12.9 field/5.7 run)

  8. jkaflagg - Nov 8, 2012 at 5:20 PM

    Maicer did a good job in Anaheim, but be prepared: he is constantly nagged by injuries. Relying on him to play regularly would be foolhardy, but in between the injuries he is a competent utility player.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Ace-killer Giants do it again
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. M. Bumgarner (3404)
  2. J. Shields (2985)
  3. T. Ishikawa (2773)
  4. T. Lincecum (2334)
  5. M. Morse (2322)
  1. L. Cain (1992)
  2. Y. Cespedes (1991)
  3. B. Posey (1858)
  4. B. Roberts (1595)
  5. A. Wainwright (1558)