Nov 19, 2012, 10:00 AM EST
That’s the word from Andy Martino:
One high-ranking major league executive who spoke recently with Mets officials came away thinking that the team “would want a monster package for (R.A.) Dickey, and if they don’t get it, probably would not trade him.”
How you know you collected baseball cards back in he day: you hear the term “monster package” and this is the first thing you think of. Anyway, Martino goes on:
The executive, who has also discussed the market for Dickey with other GMs who have asked the Mets about him, loosely defined that “monster package” as a few high-end prospects or major leaguers, likely outfielders or catching help.
That’s not gonna happen. Dickey has had a great couple of seasons, but he’s 38. When was the last time a young Cy Young-caliber pitcher got that kind of haul?
Given Martino’s previous report about Dickey being amendable to a Jake Peavy-style extension, it seems extremely unlikely that the Mets would trade him. Because it’s extremely unlikely that anyone would give up that kind of talent in return.
- My Imaginary Hall of Fame Ballot 40
- Phil Hughes signs a three-year extension with the Twins 21
- The Padres have talked to the Phillies about Cole Hamels 23
- Why is John Smoltz a shoo-in for the Hall of Fame? 62
- Phillies GM told Ryan Howard they’d be better off “not with him but without him” 85
- Trea Turner’s agent is unhappy his client is in limbo after trade to Nationals 48
- Nexen Heroes accept Jung-Ho Kang posting fee from unidentified MLB team 37
- Giants acquire Casey McGehee from the Marlins 16
- Bud Selig will get a $6 million a year pension. Which is obscene. (145)
- The United States will seek to normalize relations with Cuba (144)
- Rays, Padres, Nationals agree to 11-player trade (97)
- St. Petersburg City Council votes down deal to allow Rays to look for new stadium site (90)
- Phillies GM told Ryan Howard they’d be better off “not with him but without him” (85)