Dec 5, 2012, 10:00 AM EDT
As we all rush to make jokes about the amount of money the Red Sox gave Shane Victorino, Alex Speier of WEEI makes a good point: the Red Sox may be spending money, but they are still considerably below the luxury tax threshold, which seems to be their bright line. As such, they are not hamstringed or anything here. They could — just by way of example — sign or try to make a trade for expensive players like Cliff Lee or Josh Hamilton or whatever.
That’s something that’s easy to forget: a bad deal (and I think the Victorino deal is an overpay) is only truly bad if it prevents a team from doing other things it needs to do, either by pushing them past their budget or by filling up a roster spot. Neither the Mike Napoli deal (which I do like) or the Victorino deal do that, even if we don’t think they were the best deals in the world.
- And That Happened: Thursday’s scores and highlights 26
- MLBPA files grievance against Astros in regard to draft pick situation 28
- The eyes have it: Thomas’ greatness built on patience 13
- Expert’s Corner: How to troll fans of all 30 teams 190
- Mariners re-acquire Kendrys Morales from Twins for Stephen Pryor 21
- A’s designate $10 million reliever Jim Johnson for assignment 35
- Everything you need to know about next week’s trade deadline 35
- Impending free agent Jon Lester won’t talk contract with the Red Sox until after the season 19
- Expert’s Corner: How to troll fans of all 30 teams (191)
- Verducci: baseball should think about an “illegal defense” rule to combat shifts (162)
- Yankees acquire Chase Headley from Padres (108)
- Who is the next Face of Baseball? (97)
- David Ortiz passes Carl Yastrzemski on the all-time home run list — is he a Hall of Famer? (92)