<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A&#8217;s, Stephen Drew talking one-year deal with player option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/06/as-stephen-drew-talking-one-year-deal-with-player-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/06/as-stephen-drew-talking-one-year-deal-with-player-option/</link>
	<description>Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:51:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mazblast</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/06/as-stephen-drew-talking-one-year-deal-with-player-option/comment-page-1/#comment-409228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mazblast]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 05:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=270857#comment-409228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see a lot to get excited about with this guy--

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/d/drewst01.shtml

If he weren&#039;t named Drew, he&#039;d be considered fairly ordinary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see a lot to get excited about with this guy&#8211;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/d/drewst01.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/d/drewst01.shtml</a></p>
<p>If he weren&#8217;t named Drew, he&#8217;d be considered fairly ordinary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tuberippin</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/06/as-stephen-drew-talking-one-year-deal-with-player-option/comment-page-1/#comment-409162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tuberippin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=270857#comment-409162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Red Sox should know better than to trust a Drew.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red Sox should know better than to trust a Drew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: APBA Guy</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/06/as-stephen-drew-talking-one-year-deal-with-player-option/comment-page-1/#comment-409153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APBA Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 23:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=270857#comment-409153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It will be interesting to see how high the A&#039;s go on a 1 year plus option deal. With their young pitching they absolutely need the defense at short, but anything over $10M would really surprise me. The A&#039;s commitment for 2013 is only $ 28.5 M (approx 1.4 Feesh) with 4 Arbs and 2 FA&#039;s (McCarthy and Balfour) that they are in on. They also have about 14 (!) guys making minimum or another $ 7M total. 

So $ 10M is very do-able for Drew, while still leaving a nice raise for Balfour and McCarthy, unless someone goes crazy for them, which the A&#039;s will not do. 2012 was immensely profitable for the A&#039;s. 2013 is the last year for the old national TV contracts before the additional revenue kicks in 2014. So the A&#039;s won&#039;t go berserk on payroll but $ 62-65M is certainly feasible, and they&#039;ll trade guys mid-year if the team stinks and attendance drops back to 2010 levels.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see how high the A&#8217;s go on a 1 year plus option deal. With their young pitching they absolutely need the defense at short, but anything over $10M would really surprise me. The A&#8217;s commitment for 2013 is only $ 28.5 M (approx 1.4 Feesh) with 4 Arbs and 2 FA&#8217;s (McCarthy and Balfour) that they are in on. They also have about 14 (!) guys making minimum or another $ 7M total. </p>
<p>So $ 10M is very do-able for Drew, while still leaving a nice raise for Balfour and McCarthy, unless someone goes crazy for them, which the A&#8217;s will not do. 2012 was immensely profitable for the A&#8217;s. 2013 is the last year for the old national TV contracts before the additional revenue kicks in 2014. So the A&#8217;s won&#8217;t go berserk on payroll but $ 62-65M is certainly feasible, and they&#8217;ll trade guys mid-year if the team stinks and attendance drops back to 2010 levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
