Skip to content

The Indians are “in the best position” to sign Nick Swisher

Dec 7, 2012, 9:47 AM EDT

There’s probably one too many caveats in this tweet for it to be actually useful, but if you care about Nick Swisher and/or the Indians, here you are:


If you can’t tell, we’re in the “everyone is taking the day off after the exhausting Winter Meetings, so we’re all kinda speculating” phase of the offseason.

  1. whitdog23 - Dec 7, 2012 at 10:13 AM

    so if buster is unclear of what nick wants….how can he be sure Cleveland is the right place?? ridiculous journalism

  2. fanofevilempire - Dec 7, 2012 at 10:29 AM

    Buster is very good at what he does……………
    stop hating………………………

  3. jrs45 - Dec 7, 2012 at 11:15 AM

    Sweet! I’d take Swish and Youk!!!

  4. deathmonkey41 - Dec 7, 2012 at 12:06 PM

    He might not want to stick out his tongue so much in Cleveland or he might start eating a lot of midges.

  5. urfinished - Dec 7, 2012 at 12:39 PM

    Swisher is a classic example of a guy who thrives off of bad pitching. Good pitchers get him out every time. That isnt always a bad thing…he will help with a win or two throughout the year and he’s a good clubhouse guy.
    He should arguably be left completely off a playoff roster though.

    • deathmonkey41 - Dec 7, 2012 at 1:05 PM

      With two strikes, throw him the pitch that dives down and away every time.

  6. bigtrav425 - Dec 7, 2012 at 1:19 PM

    ugh i hope not..we have enough average at best hitters in this line up! He K’s entirely to much…save the cash for someone good atleas. Fuck me i hate this ownership

  7. pisano - Dec 9, 2012 at 2:11 AM

    Guess what? Cleveland can have him.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. D. Wright (3074)
  2. J. Fernandez (2529)
  3. D. Span (2449)
  4. Y. Cespedes (2439)
  5. G. Stanton (2433)
  1. F. Rodney (2160)
  2. Y. Puig (2155)
  3. M. Teixeira (2115)
  4. G. Springer (2040)
  5. H. Olivera (1961)