Skip to content

Andre Ethier is on the trading block

Dec 18, 2012, 9:26 AM EDT

UPDATE: Rosenthal says the Dodgers have “zero intention” of trading Ethier, but will listen. He says two teams have inquired.

October: The Dodgers are interested in trading Andre Ethier!

November: No, the Dodgers are not interested in trading Andre Ethier.

December: The Dodgers are interested in trading Andre Ethier:

I don’t doubt that the Dodgers would actually like to trade Ethier, but he’s got an ugly contract, even by late 2012′s increasingly crazy standards. L.A. owes him $85 million between now and 2017. This for a guy who turns 31 next season.  If anyone wanted Ethier, they’d be better off just signing Nick Swisher themselves.

Which doesn’t mean he’s untradable. For one thing — as one of my Tweeps notes — a free agent like Swisher may nit wish to go to a place like, say, Seattle, so if the M’s wanted his like, they could do a deal for Ethier. And of course, L.A. could kick in a lot of money in any Ethier deal.

Still seems pretty unlikely anyone would bite, but stranger things have happened.

  1. lostsok - Dec 18, 2012 at 9:31 AM

    Either hits right-handers way better than Swisher, but Swisher crushes lefties where Either can’t touch them. Both are adequate but unspectacular fielders.

    It seems like kind of a zero sum move for LA.

  2. MyTeamsAllStink - Dec 18, 2012 at 9:41 AM

    I’ve never been the biggest Eithier fan but didn’t they just sign him to a new contract?And Swisher isn’t much of an upgrade if that’s who they are in fact targeting.Im guessing Eithier and his whining may have finally gotten old while Swisher is a good clubhouse guy.

  3. chill1184 - Dec 18, 2012 at 10:07 AM

    Obviously the Dodgers would have to eat some of that money in order to move him. I dont see a team taking 17 mil per year for an outfielder who is going to be 31 next season.

    • paperlions - Dec 18, 2012 at 11:18 AM

      Of course they would have to eat a lot of that deal…he’s never had a single season worth that kind of salary…and now he’s no the wrong side of 30. He wouldn’t have gotten a contract even close to that extension if he was a FA.

      • senioreditor2 - Dec 18, 2012 at 12:07 PM

        Have you seen the dollars being thrown around this off season. He undoubtedly would have been given similar money if 29 other teams had a chance to bid.

      • paperlions - Dec 18, 2012 at 2:00 PM

        No, he wouldn’t have. Those dollars have only been thrown at a few guys…each of which are far better than Ethier. He’s just not that good There is no way anyone was giving him $17M/year for 5 years. Upton didn’t get that and he’s the far more valuable and younger player.

  4. sdelmonte - Dec 18, 2012 at 10:10 AM

    Ironically, the only team that seems to be making trades for contracts like Ethier’s is the Dodgers.

  5. hisgirlgotburrelled - Dec 18, 2012 at 10:13 AM

    I wonder if getting traded to Seattle is what Ethier had in mind when he signed a 6-year contract to stay in LA just 6 months ago.

  6. SOBEIT - Dec 18, 2012 at 11:08 AM

    dejavu…this will be the story for years. Just replace Ethier with the next max contract player who is suddenly unproductive, but you have a logjam of players at the position, and there is an upgrade available in the FA market.

  7. losanginsight - Dec 18, 2012 at 12:42 PM

    Ned should try to get GC Stanton and pay 95% of Ethiers contract and throw in the Harangatang too.

  8. MyTeamsAllStink - Dec 18, 2012 at 1:19 PM

    Eithier to the Rangers for Ian Kinsler.Dodgers need a second baseman (sorry mark Ellis) and the Rangers need a right fielder

    • paperlions - Dec 18, 2012 at 2:02 PM

      Why would the Rangers do that when they can sign Swisher, who is the same player, only more durable with slightly better defense, to a better contract without trading anyone?

      • koufaxmitzvah - Dec 18, 2012 at 6:12 PM

        Swisher has a Gold Glove?

      • paperlions - Dec 18, 2012 at 6:48 PM

        Yeah, because GG are reflective of defensive ability. *eye roll*

      • koufaxmitzvah - Dec 19, 2012 at 7:38 AM

        Come on, Paper. If Swisher is a better defender than Ethier ,then he should have at least 2 Gold Gloves. Based off of your rhetoric.

        So what crazy stat indicates that Swisher is better than Ethier in the outfield?

  9. iamjimmyjack - Dec 18, 2012 at 2:03 PM

    When is Ned Colletti going to get canned? This guy is handing out ludicrous contracts. Stan Kasten is a smart man. I’d be suprised if Colletti lasts another year. Yes he’s aquired good talent, but still the Dodgers are a great franchise. They shouldnt have to overpay to attract free agents. Its Los Angeles.

  10. djjackson81 - Dec 18, 2012 at 11:29 PM

    I’m glad he a Dodger being a Dbacks fan. 200 + million and counting hope Beckett and Crawford earn there money

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Three legends off to Cooperstown
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. T. Tulowitzki (3333)
  2. R. Howard (3237)
  3. C. Headley (3005)
  4. Y. Puig (2934)
  5. H. Ramirez (2843)
  1. M. Trout (2784)
  2. B. Belt (2599)
  3. C. Lee (2463)
  4. H. Street (2354)
  5. J. Soria (2298)