<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using their logic, the BBWAA has to keep Tom Glavine out of the Hall of Fame, right?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/</link>
	<description>Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:23:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: binarymath</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-426316</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[binarymath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-426316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[grrr, I hate it when I have a typo.  Last line should be &quot;...kill off the HOF&quot; not HOC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>grrr, I hate it when I have a typo.  Last line should be &#8220;&#8230;kill off the HOF&#8221; not HOC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: binarymath</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-426315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[binarymath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-426315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HOF voters have painted themselves into a corner.  They either have to admit that the 2013 &quot;nobody gets in&quot; vote was a one-time protest (which proves once and for all the the subjectivity bias that voters SWEAR they do not have), or they have to keep everybody out, which is even more absurd.

As fans, we put up with the self-serving &quot;here&#039;s my HOF ballot&quot; vanity articles.  But we also watched the players, attended the games, and read the box scores.  So his stuff all HAPPENED, and no amount of protest voting can erase that. 

The protest vote also ticked off the town-folks of Cooperstown, NY who depend on the tourism boost during Induction Week.

So here is what the voters can do for 2014.

1. stop playing God.  You said nothing about steroids when it was happening.  Don&#039;t play the self-righteous game now.
2. vote in no fewer than 5 players a year over the next 5 years (look at the currently eligible players, and the upcoming classes, and then try to tell me there are not 25 worthy candidates.)
3. eliminate the gutless blank vote farce.  Only count non-blank ballots when figuring the 75% requirement for induction.  Or better yet, require each eligible writer to vote for a minimum number of players.  No more hiding behind a blank ballot.

If the 2014 vote also inducts no one, I look for someone like Disney/ESPN to open a competing museum.  And if the competing museum allows fan voting, it will kill off the HOC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOF voters have painted themselves into a corner.  They either have to admit that the 2013 &#8220;nobody gets in&#8221; vote was a one-time protest (which proves once and for all the the subjectivity bias that voters SWEAR they do not have), or they have to keep everybody out, which is even more absurd.</p>
<p>As fans, we put up with the self-serving &#8220;here&#8217;s my HOF ballot&#8221; vanity articles.  But we also watched the players, attended the games, and read the box scores.  So his stuff all HAPPENED, and no amount of protest voting can erase that. </p>
<p>The protest vote also ticked off the town-folks of Cooperstown, NY who depend on the tourism boost during Induction Week.</p>
<p>So here is what the voters can do for 2014.</p>
<p>1. stop playing God.  You said nothing about steroids when it was happening.  Don&#8217;t play the self-righteous game now.<br />
2. vote in no fewer than 5 players a year over the next 5 years (look at the currently eligible players, and the upcoming classes, and then try to tell me there are not 25 worthy candidates.)<br />
3. eliminate the gutless blank vote farce.  Only count non-blank ballots when figuring the 75% requirement for induction.  Or better yet, require each eligible writer to vote for a minimum number of players.  No more hiding behind a blank ballot.</p>
<p>If the 2014 vote also inducts no one, I look for someone like Disney/ESPN to open a competing museum.  And if the competing museum allows fan voting, it will kill off the HOC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Fiorentino</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Fiorentino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 23:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You snuck that into you last comment. Your previous two mentioned nothing about the BBWAA. My apologies for missing &quot;their rationale&quot; in your comment. 

wpjohnson...you can go fuck yourself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You snuck that into you last comment. Your previous two mentioned nothing about the BBWAA. My apologies for missing &#8220;their rationale&#8221; in your comment. </p>
<p>wpjohnson&#8230;you can go fuck yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lordd99</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425926</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lordd99]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 21:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are right; it was common knowledge. The Yankees tried to insert some type of steroid-related language when they signed Jason Giambi, I think along the lines providing protection for them if he physically broke down or was shown to be taking steroids.  Obviously, the players&#039; union would have none of it.  Yet it shows the front office of teams were very much aware something was going on, yet they obviously didn&#039;t want to address it head on.  It was too profitable.  

MLB, from the executive level to the players, and those supporting the game, including the media and the fans, just didn&#039;t care. Just the opposite. They loved the offense and looked the other way, creating the acceptance and further use of PEDs.  It&#039;s why I have a problem with the BBWAA&#039;s retroactive crusade.  They were part of this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right; it was common knowledge. The Yankees tried to insert some type of steroid-related language when they signed Jason Giambi, I think along the lines providing protection for them if he physically broke down or was shown to be taking steroids.  Obviously, the players&#8217; union would have none of it.  Yet it shows the front office of teams were very much aware something was going on, yet they obviously didn&#8217;t want to address it head on.  It was too profitable.  </p>
<p>MLB, from the executive level to the players, and those supporting the game, including the media and the fans, just didn&#8217;t care. Just the opposite. They loved the offense and looked the other way, creating the acceptance and further use of PEDs.  It&#8217;s why I have a problem with the BBWAA&#8217;s retroactive crusade.  They were part of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lordd99</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lordd99]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 21:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeremy, I have no idea which players took what and when, or what it did. I have noticed, though, that it wasn&#039;t uncommon to find out that the players who did speak out against PED usuage were then discovered to be using PEDs.  David Ortiz and Ryan Braun are just two examples.  A player speaking out against other players, while trying to present himself as one of the &quot;good guys&quot; and above suspicion is pretty damn low.  It may be why most players never did come out and say anything.  Maybe most were using, or had experimented, so they just didn&#039;t feel comfortable coming out and saying anything. 

I also remember the Clemens connection with Schillling.  Wouldn&#039;t be shocked at all if Schilling juiced.  One thing the Mitchell Report showed was pitchers seemed to be juicing at a higher percentage than position players, but they didn&#039;t necessarily show the body changes.  I&#039;m pretty agnostic on the whole steriod period. I knew it was going on. We all did. MLB did. The front office types did. The players certainly did. The media. Fans.  In that, Schilling was right. An environment of acceptance was created, which ultimately forced more players into at least trying it,  so I&#039;m willing to give these guys a pass. Not so with anyone who has failed since 2003.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy, I have no idea which players took what and when, or what it did. I have noticed, though, that it wasn&#8217;t uncommon to find out that the players who did speak out against PED usuage were then discovered to be using PEDs.  David Ortiz and Ryan Braun are just two examples.  A player speaking out against other players, while trying to present himself as one of the &#8220;good guys&#8221; and above suspicion is pretty damn low.  It may be why most players never did come out and say anything.  Maybe most were using, or had experimented, so they just didn&#8217;t feel comfortable coming out and saying anything. </p>
<p>I also remember the Clemens connection with Schillling.  Wouldn&#8217;t be shocked at all if Schilling juiced.  One thing the Mitchell Report showed was pitchers seemed to be juicing at a higher percentage than position players, but they didn&#8217;t necessarily show the body changes.  I&#8217;m pretty agnostic on the whole steriod period. I knew it was going on. We all did. MLB did. The front office types did. The players certainly did. The media. Fans.  In that, Schilling was right. An environment of acceptance was created, which ultimately forced more players into at least trying it,  so I&#8217;m willing to give these guys a pass. Not so with anyone who has failed since 2003.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wpjohnson</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wpjohnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 20:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve read a lot of truly stupid posts on MLB,com.  However, I want to congratulate Chris Fiorentino.  His above post is absolutely and beyond any doubt the dumbest post ever to appear on the internet- let alone MLB.com.  Man, he must be dumb.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read a lot of truly stupid posts on MLB,com.  However, I want to congratulate Chris Fiorentino.  His above post is absolutely and beyond any doubt the dumbest post ever to appear on the internet- let alone MLB.com.  Man, he must be dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabatimus</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sabatimus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 19:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The level playing field argument, I think, works for football but not baseball.  Because football is much more of a team sport, where there&#039;s 22 guys on the field all jockeying for position at the same time.  In baseball, one man at the plate can change the course of a game with one swing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The level playing field argument, I think, works for football but not baseball.  Because football is much more of a team sport, where there&#8217;s 22 guys on the field all jockeying for position at the same time.  In baseball, one man at the plate can change the course of a game with one swing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabatimus</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425876</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sabatimus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 19:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, no sarcasm.  It IS logical.  That doesn&#039;t mean that BBWAA is doing the right thing.  That&#039;s open to a variety of opinions.  I myself am on the fence about it: I don&#039;t want cheaters in the Hall, but if that&#039;s true I&#039;d have to advocate kicking out Aaron, Mays, and Schmidt (among many others I don&#039;t know about, I&#039;m sure) for taking amphetamines.  I also think the banned substances list is idiotic on so many levels, and that people like Clemens and Bonds put up HOF numbers before they juiced, and ALSO that the character clause should be removed.

In short, the fence I&#039;m on is about as wide as the Polo Grounds was long.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, no sarcasm.  It IS logical.  That doesn&#8217;t mean that BBWAA is doing the right thing.  That&#8217;s open to a variety of opinions.  I myself am on the fence about it: I don&#8217;t want cheaters in the Hall, but if that&#8217;s true I&#8217;d have to advocate kicking out Aaron, Mays, and Schmidt (among many others I don&#8217;t know about, I&#8217;m sure) for taking amphetamines.  I also think the banned substances list is idiotic on so many levels, and that people like Clemens and Bonds put up HOF numbers before they juiced, and ALSO that the character clause should be removed.</p>
<p>In short, the fence I&#8217;m on is about as wide as the Polo Grounds was long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcfan4life</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dcfan4life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, reread my comment. Im saying thats actually how the BBWAA thinks. I said &quot;their rationale&quot;. Pay attention to whats being said to you before you respond please. And yes, i agree, that logic is idiotic. But with a squeeky clean background and amazing stats, I promise you the BBWAA votes Maddux in first time, no question.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, reread my comment. Im saying thats actually how the BBWAA thinks. I said &#8220;their rationale&#8221;. Pay attention to whats being said to you before you respond please. And yes, i agree, that logic is idiotic. But with a squeeky clean background and amazing stats, I promise you the BBWAA votes Maddux in first time, no question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Fiorentino</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Fiorentino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 05:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bonds and Clemens were involved in a steroid investigation, therefore, they definitely cheated.  And Maddux &quot;may have cheated&quot; but he should still be voted into the Hall his first time.

Wow...that&#039;s seriously as idiotic a rationale as anything said by any of the members of the BBWAA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonds and Clemens were involved in a steroid investigation, therefore, they definitely cheated.  And Maddux &#8220;may have cheated&#8221; but he should still be voted into the Hall his first time.</p>
<p>Wow&#8230;that&#8217;s seriously as idiotic a rationale as anything said by any of the members of the BBWAA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raysfan1</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raysfan1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 03:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t know why the thumbs down--that link was pretty funny]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know why the thumbs down&#8211;that link was pretty funny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcfan4life</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425718</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dcfan4life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 03:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both Bonds and Clemens trials were the direct result of a steroid investigation. And the writers opinions are thus, Bonds and Clemends definately cheated, Maddux may not have. Based on his stats and their rationale, he gets in the HOF next year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Bonds and Clemens trials were the direct result of a steroid investigation. And the writers opinions are thus, Bonds and Clemends definately cheated, Maddux may not have. Based on his stats and their rationale, he gets in the HOF next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klownboy</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425704</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[klownboy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 02:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wasn&#039;t trying to compare the two.  All I was saying was baseball writers and purists need to chill with that &quot;integrity&quot; bullshit.  Not everyone in the HOF is a saint.

And I&#039;ll say it before, and I&#039;ll say it again: neither Bonds nor Clemens failed any drug tests.  And even if they did, they were HOF&#039;ers long before any alleged drug use - just check their numbers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t trying to compare the two.  All I was saying was baseball writers and purists need to chill with that &#8220;integrity&#8221; bullshit.  Not everyone in the HOF is a saint.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;ll say it before, and I&#8217;ll say it again: neither Bonds nor Clemens failed any drug tests.  And even if they did, they were HOF&#8217;ers long before any alleged drug use &#8211; just check their numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thereisaparty</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425649</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thereisaparty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glavine played on a team that couldn&#039;t stop making the playoffs, which helped him reach an arbitrary milestone. This clearly makes him better than Schilling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glavine played on a team that couldn&#8217;t stop making the playoffs, which helped him reach an arbitrary milestone. This clearly makes him better than Schilling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thereisaparty</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thereisaparty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was a little late on the trigger, Church&#039; and &#039;Lions. But look at the numbers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a little late on the trigger, Church&#8217; and &#8216;Lions. But look at the numbers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thereisaparty</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thereisaparty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The height of stupidity is to interpret Rule 5 of the HOF&#039;s election requirements [&quot;Voting shall be based upon the player&#039;s record, playing ability, integrity, sportsmanship, character, and contributions to the team(s) on which the player played&quot;] to having bounds outside of PED usage? 

And I don&#039;t think we need to use the word &quot;alleged&quot; when talking about the character of Ty Cobb.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The height of stupidity is to interpret Rule 5 of the HOF&#8217;s election requirements ["Voting shall be based upon the player's record, playing ability, integrity, sportsmanship, character, and contributions to the team(s) on which the player played"] to having bounds outside of PED usage? </p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t think we need to use the word &#8220;alleged&#8221; when talking about the character of Ty Cobb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thereisaparty</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thereisaparty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WPJohnson,

K%, BB%, FIP-, ERA-, fWAR, rWAR, postseason performance all tilt heavily in Schilling&#039;s favor. 

Maybe you can convince me that Tom Glavine is substantially more HOF-worthy than Kevin Brown?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WPJohnson,</p>
<p>K%, BB%, FIP-, ERA-, fWAR, rWAR, postseason performance all tilt heavily in Schilling&#8217;s favor. </p>
<p>Maybe you can convince me that Tom Glavine is substantially more HOF-worthy than Kevin Brown?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;If you have looked at the numbers and you still don’t think Glavine was far superior to Schilling, there is no hope for you.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

K/BB:
Schilling - 4.38 (best all time of any pitcher with 1,000+ innings)
Glavine - 1.74

K/9
Schilling - 8.6
Glavine - 5.3

BB/9
Schilling - 2.0
Glavine - 3.1

WHIP
Schilling - 1.137
Glavine - 1.314

ERA
Schilling - 3.46
Glavine - 3.54

ERA+
Schilling - 127
Glavine - 118

Glavine has the edge in wins (305 to 216), IP (4413 to 3261) and essentially a push in win % (.600 to .597).  So what numbers should we look at to see Glavine was much better again?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If you have looked at the numbers and you still don’t think Glavine was far superior to Schilling, there is no hope for you.</p></blockquote>
<p>K/BB:<br />
Schilling &#8211; 4.38 (best all time of any pitcher with 1,000+ innings)<br />
Glavine &#8211; 1.74</p>
<p>K/9<br />
Schilling &#8211; 8.6<br />
Glavine &#8211; 5.3</p>
<p>BB/9<br />
Schilling &#8211; 2.0<br />
Glavine &#8211; 3.1</p>
<p>WHIP<br />
Schilling &#8211; 1.137<br />
Glavine &#8211; 1.314</p>
<p>ERA<br />
Schilling &#8211; 3.46<br />
Glavine &#8211; 3.54</p>
<p>ERA+<br />
Schilling &#8211; 127<br />
Glavine &#8211; 118</p>
<p>Glavine has the edge in wins (305 to 216), IP (4413 to 3261) and essentially a push in win % (.600 to .597).  So what numbers should we look at to see Glavine was much better again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WPJ, Schilling had a better ERA, struck out guys at a higher rate, walked fewer guys.....he was better in every way except longevity.  The differences are more stark if you bother to account for park effects.  The only thing Glavine did was pitch longer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WPJ, Schilling had a better ERA, struck out guys at a higher rate, walked fewer guys&#8230;..he was better in every way except longevity.  The differences are more stark if you bother to account for park effects.  The only thing Glavine did was pitch longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thereisaparty</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thereisaparty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So are you a big pitcher wins fan? Or RA9-Wins? One of these cases is legitimate, the other I will completely ignore. 

Please try to construct a case where Glavine is the superior pitcher.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are you a big pitcher wins fan? Or RA9-Wins? One of these cases is legitimate, the other I will completely ignore. </p>
<p>Please try to construct a case where Glavine is the superior pitcher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425625</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Then you aren&#039;t looking at the right numbers.  Without using pitcher wins, go find something that says Glavine was better.  Good luck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then you aren&#8217;t looking at the right numbers.  Without using pitcher wins, go find something that says Glavine was better.  Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wpjohnson</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425620</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wpjohnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have looked at the numbers and you still don&#039;t think Glavine was far superior to Schilling, there is no hope for you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have looked at the numbers and you still don&#8217;t think Glavine was far superior to Schilling, there is no hope for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wpjohnson</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425618</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wpjohnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can&#039;t be serious.  Glavine&#039;s numbers are H of F.  Schilling&#039;s numbers are not.  And neither are Morris&#039;s numbers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t be serious.  Glavine&#8217;s numbers are H of F.  Schilling&#8217;s numbers are not.  And neither are Morris&#8217;s numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wpjohnson</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425613</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wpjohnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Baseball had and continues to have many so called &quot;racists&quot; of all shapes and colors.  If Ty Cobb didn&#039;t like minorities, what did that have to do with his performance and accumulated numbers?  Nothing.  To compare rampant use of PEDs with alleged &quot;racist&quot; opinions is the height of stupidity.  There is no comparison.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baseball had and continues to have many so called &#8220;racists&#8221; of all shapes and colors.  If Ty Cobb didn&#8217;t like minorities, what did that have to do with his performance and accumulated numbers?  Nothing.  To compare rampant use of PEDs with alleged &#8220;racist&#8221; opinions is the height of stupidity.  There is no comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thereisaparty</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thereisaparty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And one of the greatest postseason pitchers of all-time. And that is not hyperbole, like when such praise is used to describe Jack Morris.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And one of the greatest postseason pitchers of all-time. And that is not hyperbole, like when such praise is used to describe Jack Morris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ugglasforearms</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ugglasforearms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 21:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s some Klown spamming bro&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s some Klown spamming bro&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walk</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the issue being overlooked is the collective bargaining agreement. The players agreed to certain testing and other rules and provide their services as outlined in their contracts. To get increased testing they would need to be offered some form of compensation. Increase retirement benefits or base salary or something. The players had no incentive to agree to a new contract mid contract. That is a lot like a player saying he deserved a raise because he had a good year. Now glavine as a player rep is supposed the be the bad guy because the players simply wanted to uphold a written contract? There was more than one signature on that contract. Do not get confused every party involved in baseball had a hand in this stink, from the players to the reporters to the front office, and yes even the fans were indirectly involved as we watched the game come back from a strike riddled and troubled season and poyred into the stands at a great pace to see shattered records. The hall of fame is supposed to recognise the best players of their era and judge them by their peers of that era. As deplorable as i think it is the era of mcgwire and sosa and bonds played in is called the steroids era, judge these players as best you can by their peers and move on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the issue being overlooked is the collective bargaining agreement. The players agreed to certain testing and other rules and provide their services as outlined in their contracts. To get increased testing they would need to be offered some form of compensation. Increase retirement benefits or base salary or something. The players had no incentive to agree to a new contract mid contract. That is a lot like a player saying he deserved a raise because he had a good year. Now glavine as a player rep is supposed the be the bad guy because the players simply wanted to uphold a written contract? There was more than one signature on that contract. Do not get confused every party involved in baseball had a hand in this stink, from the players to the reporters to the front office, and yes even the fans were indirectly involved as we watched the game come back from a strike riddled and troubled season and poyred into the stands at a great pace to see shattered records. The hall of fame is supposed to recognise the best players of their era and judge them by their peers of that era. As deplorable as i think it is the era of mcgwire and sosa and bonds played in is called the steroids era, judge these players as best you can by their peers and move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 19:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No sure how it is that people don&#039;t realize how good Schilling was....yeah, he was an asshat, but he was also a fantastic pitcher.  He has the best K/BB ratio since baseball decreased the number of ball required for a walk to 4 (in 1889) of any pitcher to throw at least 1000 innings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No sure how it is that people don&#8217;t realize how good Schilling was&#8230;.yeah, he was an asshat, but he was also a fantastic pitcher.  He has the best K/BB ratio since baseball decreased the number of ball required for a walk to 4 (in 1889) of any pitcher to throw at least 1000 innings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klownboy</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[klownboy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 19:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The writers were crazy to leave Bonds and Clemens out.  They were Hall of Famers BEFORE the alleged steroid use.  

Besides, doesn&#039;t the HOF have a racist in Ty Cobb, and probably more before integration?  Give me a break.
http://wp.me/p1gCK6-z1]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The writers were crazy to leave Bonds and Clemens out.  They were Hall of Famers BEFORE the alleged steroid use.  </p>
<p>Besides, doesn&#8217;t the HOF have a racist in Ty Cobb, and probably more before integration?  Give me a break.<br />
<a href="http://wp.me/p1gCK6-z1" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/p1gCK6-z1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramrene</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/11/using-their-logic-the-bbwaa-has-to-keep-tom-glavine-out-of-the-hall-of-fame-right/comment-page-1/#comment-425430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ramrene]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=286288#comment-425430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s very logical....  suspected of PED&#039;s and you&#039;re not getting in.  Break one of the &quot;hallowed&quot; records and you&#039;re never getting in.

Seems plenty logical.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very logical&#8230;.  suspected of PED&#8217;s and you&#8217;re not getting in.  Break one of the &#8220;hallowed&#8221; records and you&#8217;re never getting in.</p>
<p>Seems plenty logical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
