Skip to content

Red Sox and Craig Breslow reach two-year deal to avoid arbitration

Jan 19, 2013, 3:33 PM EDT

Red Sox Rays Baseball AP

Yahoo! Sports’ Tim Brown reports that left-hander Craig Breslow has avoided arbitration with the Red Sox by agreeing to a two-year contract, pending a physical. He’s guaranteed a total $6.25 million while the contract includes an option for 2015. The deal could max out at $10.15 million.

Breslow requested $2.375 million and was offered $2.325 million from the Red Sox when arbitration figures were exchanged yesterday, so it was assumed that it wouldn’t take long to hammer out an agreement. The 32-year-old is arbitration-eligible for the final time this winter, so the new deal buys out at least his first year of free agency.

Breslow posted a 2.70 ERA and 61/22 K/BB ratio over 63 1/3 innings last season between the Diamondbacks and Red Sox. He has compiled a 3.00 ERA over seven major league seasons.

  1. uyf1950 - Jan 19, 2013 at 3:39 PM

    Looks to me like whoever does the math in the Red Sox office made a big mistake here. Breslow submitted a 1 year $2.375MM figure for arbitration and the Red Sox make him a deal on a 2 year $6.25MM guarantee with a potential to make $10.15MM total over the 2 years with incentives.

    • uyf1950 - Jan 19, 2013 at 3:54 PM

      Sorry looks like my above post is completely off base. I glanced over the fact it’s actually 2 years guaranteed with a 3rd year option that brings the total deal including the option to just over $10MM. I fully intend to ask for a refund from Sylvan for my speed reading class. That’s a joke, but again my apologies.

      • theskinsman - Jan 20, 2013 at 5:36 AM

        Now you stop being reasonable. How can I enjoy my reading about every Red Sox signing without the obligatory ‘Another overpay by Boston’ comment from you??
        The off-season is long,let’s not be so quick to remove the entertainment reading,my friend.

  2. quintjs - Jan 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM

    so… its almost like a 2 year contract, taking his final arbitration-eligible season and first free agent season was planned the entire time..?

    It may be a slight overpay, but its probably better than signing him for $3m and see him leaving at years end for a 3/20 contract, which is what FA relievers seem to sign for nowadays.

  3. moogro - Jan 20, 2013 at 10:24 PM

    Twins never should have let him go.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Pitching duel highlights Game 1 of WS
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. M. Bumgarner (2667)
  2. T. Ishikawa (2662)
  3. J. Shields (2369)
  4. Y. Molina (2014)
  5. L. Cain (1972)
  1. T. Lincecum (1909)
  2. Y. Cespedes (1710)
  3. A. Wainwright (1687)
  4. B. Posey (1682)
  5. M. Morse (1567)