<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is some performance enhancement OK but not others?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/</link>
	<description>Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:54:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: deadeyedesign23</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deadeyedesign23]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 02:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;B&gt;&quot;You do realize that for every Sosa/McGwire/Bonds, we can list just as many players who took steroids that didn’t have absurd HR totals right? That there were a significant number of pitchers who also took steroids?&quot;&lt;/b&gt;

Well not everyone who took them was already one of the 20 greatest players of all time in the case of Bonds. The pitchers argument doesn&#039;t hold water because even if we assume there was one pitcher on steroids for everyone one hitter the overall offensive numbers for the era were astronomical.

&lt;b&gt;&quot;The whole background for Bonds’s steroid use is he was pissed at the national attention paid to McGwire and Sosa during their epic HR chase in ’98. It’s not possible for that narrative to be true if he was already taking it.&lt;/b&gt;

You&#039;re right I meant that he started taking them after the 98 season. I had assumed that meant he started in the months following the end of the season which would still have been 98, but in either case the point is the same.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>&#8220;You do realize that for every Sosa/McGwire/Bonds, we can list just as many players who took steroids that didn’t have absurd HR totals right? That there were a significant number of pitchers who also took steroids?&#8221;</b></p>
<p>Well not everyone who took them was already one of the 20 greatest players of all time in the case of Bonds. The pitchers argument doesn&#8217;t hold water because even if we assume there was one pitcher on steroids for everyone one hitter the overall offensive numbers for the era were astronomical.</p>
<p><b>&#8220;The whole background for Bonds’s steroid use is he was pissed at the national attention paid to McGwire and Sosa during their epic HR chase in ’98. It’s not possible for that narrative to be true if he was already taking it.</b></p>
<p>You&#8217;re right I meant that he started taking them after the 98 season. I had assumed that meant he started in the months following the end of the season which would still have been 98, but in either case the point is the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deadeyedesign23</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deadeyedesign23]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 02:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess all the luck in the world happened between 1998 and 2001 then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess all the luck in the world happened between 1998 and 2001 then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: offseasonblues</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-2/#comment-436653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[offseasonblues]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is some performance enhancement OK but not others?
I expect a ton of thumbs down for not following the group think here, but come on, this is a stupid question.
Why is caffeine legal and methamphetamines aren’t?
Why does morphine require a doctor’s care and ibuprofen sit on grocery store shelves?
Why does a doctor treat a bad case of poison ivy with prednisone instead of anabolic steroids?
Why is marijuana on the verge of legality and crack cocaine isn’t?

We may not have the information we need to put any given &quot;PED&quot; in the right category, but we have every right to distinguish between substances based on what we do know or think we know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is some performance enhancement OK but not others?<br />
I expect a ton of thumbs down for not following the group think here, but come on, this is a stupid question.<br />
Why is caffeine legal and methamphetamines aren’t?<br />
Why does morphine require a doctor’s care and ibuprofen sit on grocery store shelves?<br />
Why does a doctor treat a bad case of poison ivy with prednisone instead of anabolic steroids?<br />
Why is marijuana on the verge of legality and crack cocaine isn’t?</p>
<p>We may not have the information we need to put any given &#8220;PED&#8221; in the right category, but we have every right to distinguish between substances based on what we do know or think we know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bh192012</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436512</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bh192012]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It is not enough to draw some line &quot;  Really, the sport literally has lines in it.  I suppose speed limit signs should just say &quot;fast&quot; or &quot;slow?&quot;  Foul balls are the result of someone being pedantic.

The players should not be above regular humans, (otherwise we&#039;d watch robot baseball.)  When everyone can easily go to their doctor (not a quack job) and get a perscription for PED&#039;s so they can be ripped, is when PED&#039;s will become less stigmatized.  I&#039;m not talking for medical reasons, I mean we can walk in there and say &quot;I wanna be ripped, what can you do for me?&quot;  I can get a cortizone shot perscribed by a doctor just like a baseball player.  This is why there are parts of the rules about regular perscriptions by doctors.  Basically what&#039;s ok for players is ok for regular people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is not enough to draw some line &#8221;  Really, the sport literally has lines in it.  I suppose speed limit signs should just say &#8220;fast&#8221; or &#8220;slow?&#8221;  Foul balls are the result of someone being pedantic.</p>
<p>The players should not be above regular humans, (otherwise we&#8217;d watch robot baseball.)  When everyone can easily go to their doctor (not a quack job) and get a perscription for PED&#8217;s so they can be ripped, is when PED&#8217;s will become less stigmatized.  I&#8217;m not talking for medical reasons, I mean we can walk in there and say &#8220;I wanna be ripped, what can you do for me?&#8221;  I can get a cortizone shot perscribed by a doctor just like a baseball player.  This is why there are parts of the rules about regular perscriptions by doctors.  Basically what&#8217;s ok for players is ok for regular people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cur68</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cur68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Flow&quot;? I gots to flow, too? Like with grace? And Rhythm? And stuff? Shit. I&#039;m doomed. I got no grace. No athletic ability at all, in fact. I&#039;m been getting by on brains, determination, and grit. Dang paradigm change! I knew it would bite me onna ass...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Flow&#8221;? I gots to flow, too? Like with grace? And Rhythm? And stuff? Shit. I&#8217;m doomed. I got no grace. No athletic ability at all, in fact. I&#8217;m been getting by on brains, determination, and grit. Dang paradigm change! I knew it would bite me onna ass&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 49ersgiants4life</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[49ersgiants4life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I could take all of the HGH and steroids I want but that isn&#039;t going to make me win 7 Cy&#039;s or 8 MVP&#039;s the guy with one of the first comments said certain ones were okay cause it can help a player recover from an injury faster or allow them to play a double header but that&#039;s the same thing as prolonging your career using them it is just for a longer time period]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could take all of the HGH and steroids I want but that isn&#8217;t going to make me win 7 Cy&#8217;s or 8 MVP&#8217;s the guy with one of the first comments said certain ones were okay cause it can help a player recover from an injury faster or allow them to play a double header but that&#8217;s the same thing as prolonging your career using them it is just for a longer time period</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: historiophiliac</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[historiophiliac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dude, it has to flow.  Like this: forgedaboudit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, it has to flow.  Like this: forgedaboudit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cur68</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cur68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, I better make a list. This stuff sounds like some good juju.

So:
1) Cup
2) Icy Hot (apply where on person? If you say &quot;cup&quot; I shall suspect you aren&#039;t helping)
3) Eye Black
4) Phiten Necklace
5) Beta Blockers to keep the tears under control (I have no idea if this works, by the way, but I BELIEVE in PEDS)
6) Shirt
7) Valverde Dance
8) Spit 3 times (might be tough after Beta Blockers)
9) Get into catcher&#039;s crouch, drop throwing hand into groin, fan fingers, and waggle them

That it? I&#039;m going to have enough trouble recalling all the statistical work so that list better not get any longer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I better make a list. This stuff sounds like some good juju.</p>
<p>So:<br />
1) Cup<br />
2) Icy Hot (apply where on person? If you say &#8220;cup&#8221; I shall suspect you aren&#8217;t helping)<br />
3) Eye Black<br />
4) Phiten Necklace<br />
5) Beta Blockers to keep the tears under control (I have no idea if this works, by the way, but I BELIEVE in PEDS)<br />
6) Shirt<br />
7) Valverde Dance<br />
8) Spit 3 times (might be tough after Beta Blockers)<br />
9) Get into catcher&#8217;s crouch, drop throwing hand into groin, fan fingers, and waggle them</p>
<p>That it? I&#8217;m going to have enough trouble recalling all the statistical work so that list better not get any longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: historiophiliac</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[historiophiliac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do a little Valverde dance &amp; spit three times before you go in...and make the sign of the knuckler.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do a little Valverde dance &amp; spit three times before you go in&#8230;and make the sign of the knuckler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cur68</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436453</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cur68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look, I plan to wear a shirt, ok? Not only a shirt, but one with arms and a collar, too. Don&#039;t be getting all &#039;motional here, ok. Bad enough that I&#039;m sweating bullets over flip-flops or sandals, I don&#039;t need any more pressure. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, I plan to wear a shirt, ok? Not only a shirt, but one with arms and a collar, too. Don&#8217;t be getting all &#8216;motional here, ok. Bad enough that I&#8217;m sweating bullets over flip-flops or sandals, I don&#8217;t need any more pressure. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: historiophiliac</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[historiophiliac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t make me ashamed, man!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t make me ashamed, man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cur68</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cur68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I shall blubber like a wee baby. Its my only chance. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shall blubber like a wee baby. Its my only chance. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquotE&gt;The ‘eye test’ is actually pretty revealing when applied to weightlifting and spending 5 days a week in a gym. Some guys strength and muscularity are physically impossible when considering their training habits/diet, without the aid of steroids.&lt;/blockquotE&gt;

This is true, but the phrase we should key in on is &quot;Some guys&quot;.  You can take two people, brothers even, we&#039;ll call them Jeremy and Jason, could take PEDs/&#039;roids and the benefits can wildly vary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The ‘eye test’ is actually pretty revealing when applied to weightlifting and spending 5 days a week in a gym. Some guys strength and muscularity are physically impossible when considering their training habits/diet, without the aid of steroids.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is true, but the phrase we should key in on is &#8220;Some guys&#8221;.  You can take two people, brothers even, we&#8217;ll call them Jeremy and Jason, could take PEDs/&#8217;roids and the benefits can wildly vary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason @ IIATMS</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason @ IIATMS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also demand a Congressional hearing on the overuse of Phiten necklaces and whatnot. That sh!t&#039;s pure science-ish*.

&lt;i&gt;* might be &lt;5% science, by volume. some restrictions apply&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also demand a Congressional hearing on the overuse of Phiten necklaces and whatnot. That sh!t&#8217;s pure science-ish*.</p>
<p><i>* might be &lt;5% science, by volume. some restrictions apply</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jay Gibbons isn&#039;t a prime example.  Gibbons never had a particularly good season, and his best season was AFTER steroid testing began.  What Jay Gibbons is a good example of is a marginal player who was only good enough to play in the majors during his physical peak 25-30 yrs old.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay Gibbons isn&#8217;t a prime example.  Gibbons never had a particularly good season, and his best season was AFTER steroid testing began.  What Jay Gibbons is a good example of is a marginal player who was only good enough to play in the majors during his physical peak 25-30 yrs old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, those guys don&#039;t have testosterone deficiencies for their age.  It is called senescence (i.e. growing old), at some point every guys body starts producing less testosterone because you don&#039;t need it anymore.  Prescribing it to combat the natural aging process is not the same as prescribing it for men with low testosterone for their age.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, those guys don&#8217;t have testosterone deficiencies for their age.  It is called senescence (i.e. growing old), at some point every guys body starts producing less testosterone because you don&#8217;t need it anymore.  Prescribing it to combat the natural aging process is not the same as prescribing it for men with low testosterone for their age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Moore</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Moore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not trying to argue that the distinction is completely logical.  I&#039;d actually suggest that it&#039;s mostly emotional.  Some people look at them and immediately see them as cheating that deserves the strongest possible punishment, and some people see them as just one more thing players do to try to get an edge and no more noteworthy than lifting weights or taking extra batting practice.

I think that&#039;s why discussions of PEDs tend to produce so much heat and so little light.  People are trying to come up for logical arguments for what are basically emotional positions.  That&#039;s futile effort, since you can&#039;t reason somebody out of a position they didn&#039;t reason themselves into.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not trying to argue that the distinction is completely logical.  I&#8217;d actually suggest that it&#8217;s mostly emotional.  Some people look at them and immediately see them as cheating that deserves the strongest possible punishment, and some people see them as just one more thing players do to try to get an edge and no more noteworthy than lifting weights or taking extra batting practice.</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s why discussions of PEDs tend to produce so much heat and so little light.  People are trying to come up for logical arguments for what are basically emotional positions.  That&#8217;s futile effort, since you can&#8217;t reason somebody out of a position they didn&#8217;t reason themselves into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: historiophiliac</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[historiophiliac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defending can be rough.  You might oughta get some Icy-Hot.  Wear a cup, and for God&#039;s sake, don&#039;t cry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defending can be rough.  You might oughta get some Icy-Hot.  Wear a cup, and for God&#8217;s sake, don&#8217;t cry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manchestermiracle</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[manchestermiracle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ya weirdo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya weirdo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiwicricket</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436386</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kiwicricket]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Without wading into several of the other fringe arguments which seem to be entering the equation, I can honestly say that as an obsessive weightlifter during my late teens / 20&#039;s, I have taken most over the counter &#039;supplements&#039; available (including lighter doses of andro). 

There is a disturbingly large difference between these supplements and steroids. 

Had friends take them, trained with guys who just started taking them and seen the effects. Not many things on earth can make you lift twice your natural amount in only several months, but make your body shrivel up like a roast chicken left in the oven for 6hrs when stopped.

The &#039;eye test&#039; is actually pretty revealing when applied to weightlifting and spending 5 days a week in a gym. Some guys strength and muscularity are physically impossible when considering their training habits/diet, without the aid of steroids. 

*Just my observations after lifting obsessively for a decade, not touching on any argument in particular other than anabolic steroids can transform your body into something its not physically capable of becoming naturally.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without wading into several of the other fringe arguments which seem to be entering the equation, I can honestly say that as an obsessive weightlifter during my late teens / 20&#8242;s, I have taken most over the counter &#8216;supplements&#8217; available (including lighter doses of andro). </p>
<p>There is a disturbingly large difference between these supplements and steroids. </p>
<p>Had friends take them, trained with guys who just started taking them and seen the effects. Not many things on earth can make you lift twice your natural amount in only several months, but make your body shrivel up like a roast chicken left in the oven for 6hrs when stopped.</p>
<p>The &#8216;eye test&#8217; is actually pretty revealing when applied to weightlifting and spending 5 days a week in a gym. Some guys strength and muscularity are physically impossible when considering their training habits/diet, without the aid of steroids. </p>
<p>*Just my observations after lifting obsessively for a decade, not touching on any argument in particular other than anabolic steroids can transform your body into something its not physically capable of becoming naturally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only if prescribed for an approved usage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only if prescribed for an approved usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436384</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Football caught more players in 2012 than baseball in terms of raw numbers and % of players.  Their testing system is equivalent to that in MLB (assuming they also start wasting time testing for HGH, a test that doesn&#039;t work for a drug that doesn&#039;t enhance performance).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Football caught more players in 2012 than baseball in terms of raw numbers and % of players.  Their testing system is equivalent to that in MLB (assuming they also start wasting time testing for HGH, a test that doesn&#8217;t work for a drug that doesn&#8217;t enhance performance).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You don&#039;t even have to make a hypothetical bet on this point.  The facts in evidence demonstrate its truth.  Most players that take PEDs are not stars, do not see effects on their performance, and are ignored because they are not stars.....all the while the media and fans act like any star that is caught only put up this numbers because of PED use.  It is the worst form of confirmation bias.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t even have to make a hypothetical bet on this point.  The facts in evidence demonstrate its truth.  Most players that take PEDs are not stars, do not see effects on their performance, and are ignored because they are not stars&#8230;..all the while the media and fans act like any star that is caught only put up this numbers because of PED use.  It is the worst form of confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436377</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anabolic steroids actually don&#039;t have many or common long-term negative effects unless they are horribly abused.  Just as with all drugs, they can have horrible short- and long-term effects when used irresponsibly, but one can use anabolic steroids responsibly to great benefit with zero long-term negative effect.  It is for this reason that the AMA was 100% against the 1991 legislation regarding steroids.  That legislation was 100% politically driven, not medially driven.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anabolic steroids actually don&#8217;t have many or common long-term negative effects unless they are horribly abused.  Just as with all drugs, they can have horrible short- and long-term effects when used irresponsibly, but one can use anabolic steroids responsibly to great benefit with zero long-term negative effect.  It is for this reason that the AMA was 100% against the 1991 legislation regarding steroids.  That legislation was 100% politically driven, not medially driven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paperlions</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paperlions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is essentially the same thing.  If cortisone was just discovered in the mid-90s, it would probably be on the banned list because players would have been taking it before it was approved for such usage.  The only reason I can see for the dramatic difference in attitudes between corticosteroids and many of the other PEDs is that one was available and came into use earlier, resulting in its acceptance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is essentially the same thing.  If cortisone was just discovered in the mid-90s, it would probably be on the banned list because players would have been taking it before it was approved for such usage.  The only reason I can see for the dramatic difference in attitudes between corticosteroids and many of the other PEDs is that one was available and came into use earlier, resulting in its acceptance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy T</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But what about all the players who took steroids to help them come back from an injury? Isn&#039;t that basically the same thing?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what about all the players who took steroids to help them come back from an injury? Isn&#8217;t that basically the same thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cur68</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cur68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think there&#039;s some evidence that Gatorade actually works. The eye black? Dunno. Sure makes you LOOK like you&#039;re trying, especially when you smear it all over your face, so maybe its a psychological enhancement. Like Phiten necklaces or rabbit&#039;s feet. In the case of perfectly healthy people taking HGH I think that falls right in there with the rabbit&#039;s feet/eye black/Phiten necklace, but I&#039;m prepared to wait for more and better focused research to be published for review before I buy into either stance. I might get some eye black &amp; a Phiten necklace for my thesis defence: I&#039;ll need all the help I can get.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s some evidence that Gatorade actually works. The eye black? Dunno. Sure makes you LOOK like you&#8217;re trying, especially when you smear it all over your face, so maybe its a psychological enhancement. Like Phiten necklaces or rabbit&#8217;s feet. In the case of perfectly healthy people taking HGH I think that falls right in there with the rabbit&#8217;s feet/eye black/Phiten necklace, but I&#8217;m prepared to wait for more and better focused research to be published for review before I buy into either stance. I might get some eye black &amp; a Phiten necklace for my thesis defence: I&#8217;ll need all the help I can get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, I figured it wasn&#039;t used for it&#039;s boosting performance, but the recovery use makes a ton of sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I figured it wasn&#8217;t used for it&#8217;s boosting performance, but the recovery use makes a ton of sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ezthinking</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ezthinking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you realize that out of the 1,000 or so swings a player takes at a pitched ball during the season, that by only getting lucky an extra 2.4% of the time and square up a pitch you can go from 49 to 73 HR?  1/8 of an inch is the difference between a pop up and a HR.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you realize that out of the 1,000 or so swings a player takes at a pitched ball during the season, that by only getting lucky an extra 2.4% of the time and square up a pitch you can go from 49 to 73 HR?  1/8 of an inch is the difference between a pop up and a HR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: genericcommenter</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/04/why-is-some-performance-enhancement-ok-but-not-others/comment-page-1/#comment-436338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[genericcommenter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=295186#comment-436338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most people seem to defer to authority, even (especially?) when authorities show little understanding of the issue. This is why people trust ignorant politicians over scientists and investigative journalists, and say stupid things like &quot;It&#039;s bad because it&#039;s the law.&quot;

People for the most part are incapable of or unwilling to think critically. Those who do are treated like weirdos.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people seem to defer to authority, even (especially?) when authorities show little understanding of the issue. This is why people trust ignorant politicians over scientists and investigative journalists, and say stupid things like &#8220;It&#8217;s bad because it&#8217;s the law.&#8221;</p>
<p>People for the most part are incapable of or unwilling to think critically. Those who do are treated like weirdos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
