Are you serious? Do you know what evidence is?

I think you mean, “There is absolutely zero proof.” That would be true.

Your name showing up in the ledger of a known drug zero is absolutely evidence. It’s circumstantial evidence, uncorroborated evidence, inconclusive evidence, whatever you want. He is innocent until proven guilty, all of that. But unless you’re intentionally trying to sound foolish, don’t say, “there is absolutely zero evidence Gio has done anything wrong.” Incorporating that into a statement insulting a rational person for not agreeing with your utter ignorance just makes you look like a total imbecile, and kind of an asshole to boot.

Here’s an idea, fucktard: when you ask for evidence of why a person thinks like they do, deal with it when they then point it out. If you are too stupid, close minded, moronic, or willfully obtuse (which is the worse thing thing I can think of to call someone) to handle a simple discussion, then don’t attempt to engage in them.

Now I’m done bandying words with an obvious jerk-off, so feel free to have the last word on the matter.

So what’s your point again?

The process will work itself out

Okay

I said “I don’t know the truth and neither do you”. My evidence is that you don’t know the truth (or do you?), and that I don’t know the truth (I don’t, I swear)

BTW, if you don’t want people saying for no reason at all that Gio is guilty, do not turn around and say for no reason at all that he is innocent. You don’t know the truth and neither do I.

Obviously for some, that tenuous association is enough to declare him guilty and to break out the tar and feathers.

Never mind that Bosch is a narcissistic schmuck. Never mind that unlike some other supposed clients, Gonzales’ name is not connected to any PED distribution. Never mind that there is no actual accusation by anyone in authority of any misdeed whatsoever.

facepalm

Gowachin guilty.