Comments on: Please, let us resist the “Steroids Theory of Everything”

By: shzastl

shzastl — Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:08:33 +0000

Have you been following the Pistorius story in a less than real way?

By: jwbiii

jwbiii — Thu, 21 Feb 2013 01:26:20 +0000

To quote nategearhart on the Rollins/Young thread,
“Professional” does not equate to “good”. It just means he’s paid to do it.

By: cur68

cur68 — Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:15:59 +0000

We should check him for backne.

By: The Dangerous Mabry

The Dangerous Mabry — Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:07:12 +0000

This sounds like the kind of article someone on steroids would have written.

By: El Bravo

El Bravo — Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:06:46 +0000

Sensitive much?

By: galkie11

galkie11 — Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:48:04 +0000

I’m surprised you didn’t sneak in a quote from someone affiliated with the Phillies and twist it all around in your oh-so-hysterical way, Craig. This ones actually readable which is pretty high on my list of priorities when visiting this site. Keep up the professional journalism.

By: churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged

churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged — Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:44:04 +0000

but Silver notes that, with the reports of PEDs in Oscar Pistorius’ apartment, the sporting press is starting to play armchair police, chalking up the motive to Pistorius’ alleged acts to ‘roid rage.

And the latest information during the second day of bail hearings, the defense stated that the substance was an herbal remedy (a legal supplement) to which the prosecution's witness: Botha [witness] admitted he did not know the name of the medication, saying he “didn’t read the whole name”.

By: cur68

cur68 — Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:41:56 +0000

….so you’re saying there should be more stringent testing of Sportswriters to see if they really are capable of the feats of biochemical deductions they persist in making? Couldn’t we just check the sporting press for backne? I hear that’s a pretty definitive way of telling who’s doing what.