Skip to content

Red Sox could save $2.2 million by releasing Alfredo Aceves

Feb 20, 2013, 10:47 AM EDT

Alfredo Aceves AP

Alfredo Aceves is doing his best to build a terrible relationship with a second straight Red Sox manager, but so far at least there are no reports of Boston being fed up enough to part ways with the reliever.

However, like all arbitration-eligible players who signed one-year deals to avoid a hearing Aceves’ contract is not fully guaranteed.

If released by March 13 the Red Sox would owe Aceves just one-sixth of his deal, which would take them off the hook for $2.2 million of his $2.65 million salary. And if the Red Sox waited a little longer and released Aceves by March 27 they’d owe him one-fourth of the money, saving $1.9875 million.

Over the years there are a few cases of a team releasing a signed player under those rules, but it’s definitely not a common occurrence. Sean McAdam of speculates that trading Aceves is a more likely option because he probably still has enough value to either get something in return or at least shed his entire salary.

  1. skeleteeth - Feb 20, 2013 at 10:55 AM

    To Miami for the “sculpture” then sink the “sculpture” off the coast of Miami for artificial reef. Done.

  2. shaggylocks - Feb 20, 2013 at 10:59 AM

    If they’re not sure they can get a handle on him they seriously need to do this. He was a rockstar vulture/setup man/long man in 2011, but he’s been a ticking tantrum-bomb since, and if there’s one thing Boston doesn’t need right now it’s a guy like that in the clubhouse.

  3. chacochicken - Feb 20, 2013 at 11:04 AM

    I’m willing to sell the Sox a pitching machine I built at home from old lawn mower parts and a couple of scrap Macs. I does talk back and uses the occasional racial slur but I’d let it go for 900,000. Probably less of a pain than Aceves but it does weigh like 7 bills.

  4. Mr. Furious - Feb 20, 2013 at 11:32 AM

    That’s really interesting. I had thought that the only way the contract was non-guaranteed was if it went all the way through the hearing process.

  5. proudlycanadian - Feb 20, 2013 at 11:59 AM

    I am sure that the Mariners do not want him as the PTNL.

  6. hushbrother - Feb 20, 2013 at 12:00 PM

    How about releasing him because he’s a sucky pitcher? His incompetence at holding late inning leads was a big reason for the Red Sox’ lousy season.

  7. bostonboy82 - Feb 20, 2013 at 12:20 PM

    Hang him high for all to see.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. D. Wright (2486)
  2. D. Span (2327)
  3. G. Stanton (2259)
  4. Y. Puig (2225)
  5. J. Fernandez (2179)
  1. B. Crawford (2008)
  2. G. Springer (2000)
  3. M. Sano (1803)
  4. M. Teixeira (1801)
  5. J. Hamilton (1722)