Comments on: The Mets were seriously in on Justin Upton http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/25/the-mets-were-seriously-in-on-justin-upton/ Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball. Wed, 22 May 2013 21:38:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: chacochicken http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/25/the-mets-were-seriously-in-on-justin-upton/comment-page-1/#comment-447493 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:10:33 +0000 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=300072#comment-447493 Well, for what its worth, I was almost king of Kafiristan.

]]> By: dondada10 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/25/the-mets-were-seriously-in-on-justin-upton/comment-page-1/#comment-447480 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:53:13 +0000 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=300072#comment-447480 Just playing devil’s advocate: Doesn’t MLB Trade Rumors aggragate? Do HBT reaggragates.

]]> By: cackalackyank http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/25/the-mets-were-seriously-in-on-justin-upton/comment-page-1/#comment-447466 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:35:04 +0000 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=300072#comment-447466 Umm…at this point does anything in ths story really matter?

]]> By: jwbiii http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/25/the-mets-were-seriously-in-on-justin-upton/comment-page-1/#comment-447465 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:33:56 +0000 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=300072#comment-447465 To be fair, there’s a fair amount of overlap in the stories which they cover. This and “What Will the Yankees do without Granderson?,” for example.

Here, you’ll get posts on Loria’s missive to the Miamians and there you get news that the Red Sox signed Ryan Rowland-Smith, so there are differences in the sorts of things they cover.

]]> By: thebadguyswon http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/25/the-mets-were-seriously-in-on-justin-upton/comment-page-1/#comment-447462 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:31:27 +0000 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=300072#comment-447462 The word was the Dbacks wanted Harvey or Wheeler. I don’t blame them for asking, but no way would I include either of them for Upton.

]]> By: natslady http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/25/the-mets-were-seriously-in-on-justin-upton/comment-page-1/#comment-447458 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:27:58 +0000 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=300072#comment-447458 OK, “aggregating.” Sheesh, some people and their thumbs.

]]> By: historiophiliac http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/25/the-mets-were-seriously-in-on-justin-upton/comment-page-1/#comment-447456 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:26:30 +0000 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=300072#comment-447456 Must be a Yahoo.

]]> By: natslady http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/25/the-mets-were-seriously-in-on-justin-upton/comment-page-1/#comment-447451 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:17:12 +0000 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=300072#comment-447451 Plus, there are some funny commenters. Actually, that’s a plus+++++.

]]> By: natslady http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/25/the-mets-were-seriously-in-on-justin-upton/comment-page-1/#comment-447450 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:14:16 +0000 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=300072#comment-447450 Basically, yes. They sit around Twitter and sites they subscribe to, then they summarize them and provide links. It’s known as “aggragating,” and I find it very helpful, since I can’t spend all day on Twitter, nor do I subscribe to dozens of sites.

Sometimes Craig goes all smartypants and philosophical on us, which is substantially less helpful, or Matthew tries to do some analytics, which is also not helpful. Take the bad with the good. You’re not paying anything.

]]> By: nogoodtomedead http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/25/the-mets-were-seriously-in-on-justin-upton/comment-page-1/#comment-447428 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:36:36 +0000 http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=300072#comment-447428 So…. hardballtalk is just like the cliffnotes of mlbtraderumors with a picture added huh?

]]>