Skip to content

The Giants and Buster Posey continue extension talks

Mar 20, 2013, 5:00 PM EDT

Posey Getty Getty Images

Last week we heard that the Giants and Buster Posey had “exchanged preliminary ideas” about a multi-year deal to buy out his remaining arbitration years. Today Jon Heyman reports that those talks continue, though there is a “decent-sized gap” between the parties. Part of that gap is contract length, with Posey apparently wanting a Joey Votto/Troy Tulowitzki-style decade deal, with the team preferring to buy out the arbitration years and take it from there.

I’d take it from there. Posey is awesome, yes, but he’s also a catcher. If he stays a catcher, you have to be mindful of wear and tear. If he doesn’t, you have to be sure he can handle another position. I imagine he can — dude used to be a shortstop, so he’s more like Biggio than he is like a late-period Piazza or Bench — but you don’t know until you’ve tried it.

I’m usually about the players getting paid, but in this case, if I were the Giants, I’d play the waiting game for a while, content that there is a good chance that, even if you only keep Posey for six years, you’re likely to be getting his best ones.

  1. sometimesimisscandlestick - Mar 20, 2013 at 6:16 PM

    I do like the idea of having Buster around for a long time. I would guess that we’ll see something like a seven year deal.

    • pandorasdadca - Mar 20, 2013 at 7:03 PM

      2 Things. 1, Hook Posey up. We know he play 1st pretty well, and he’s the heart and soul of that line-up.

      2. That is a great screen name! I grew up with night games at The Stick! I hope they play one more game there (even a bay bridge preseason game) before it gets bulldozed.

      • sometimesimisscandlestick - Mar 20, 2013 at 8:40 PM

        That’s how I thought of the name. I basically grew up at Candlestick watching those horrible teams in the 70s/80s and I have a bunch of earned Croix de Candelsticks.

  2. nogoodtomedead - Mar 20, 2013 at 8:33 PM

    I think any concerns about a 10 year deal are spot on.

    But I’d sign him to it anyways.

    He’ll be a first class face of the franchise, which in marketing and tickets and fan-base and all those other off the field benefits is a great thing.

    He can play first base- guaranteed- and if Belt never finds more power there’s not really anybody blocking him there.

    I’d rather sign him to 10 now then winging up signing him to a 7 year deal at like 31-32 like free agency seems to dictate.

    And in what has really only been two years in the league- 2 rings, Rookie of the Year, MVP.

    Modern player contracts pay for what a player has previously done anyways- pay the man.

    Go Giants.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

This was 'the perfect baseball game'
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. S. Kazmir (5384)
  2. G. Springer (3721)
  3. M. Machado (3059)
  4. K. Uehara (2722)
  5. B. Harper (2609)
  1. C. Kimbrel (2560)
  2. D. Pedroia (2497)
  3. J. Reyes (2428)
  4. J. Chavez (2388)
  5. C. Granderson (2386)