Skip to content

2013 Preview: Baltimore Orioles

Mar 26, 2013, 12:30 PM EDT

Baltimore Orioles' Johnson pitches against the Boston Red Sox during a MLB spring training baseball game in Sarasota, Florida

Between now and Opening Day, HardballTalk will take a look at each of baseball’s 30 teams, asking the key questions, the not-so-key questions, and generally breaking down their chances for the 2013 season. Up next: The Baltimore Orioles.

The Big Question: Was last season a fluke?

Wanna make an Orioles fan mad? Tell them that the Orioles got lucky in 2012. Tell them that winning all of those one-run and extra innings games was fluky and rare. Cite their pythagorean record (82-80) and say that it was way more reflective of team quality than their actual record (93-69). Tell them that their — well, let’s call it good fortune for now — in close games was unprecedented in recent baseball history and, as such, it is not something that can be expected to be repeated in 2013.  Hoo-boy, they get rather perturbed at that!

Thing is, it wasn’t just dumb luck as in “wow, how the hell did that happen?” luck. Winning so many tight games was mostly a function of the bullpen. Jim Johnson, Darren O’Day, Pedro Strop, Troy Patton and Luis Ayala all managed to have great seasons at once, and Buck Showalter was damn nigh masterful at deciding when to put them into games. That actually happened, without supernatural interference. But it’s also something that, historically, isn’t easy to replicate.

Which isn’t to say that the bullpen will be bad this year. It’s a very good bullpen. But things change from year to year. Guys who had big workloads in one year like Johnson don’t alway maintain their mojo. Pitchers who have been hurt before, like Darren O’Day, can get hurt again. No team in baseball history has ever had everything go right one year and then have all those same things go right the next year. It just doesn’t work that way.

So maybe the real question isn’t whether last season was a fluke. Last season happened and it nothing will ever take that away. But without even getting into the question of luck, one must acknowledge that what occurred last season as far as dominant bullpen work in addition to a few fortunate bounces here or there, is unlikely to occur this season or, at the very least, is not something one can count on with any amount of certainty in March.  If the Orioles are to make the playoffs again, they’ll have to improve in some other areas, anticipating that they’ll regress in the one area where the exceeded any reasonable expectations in 2012.

So what else is going on?

  • All of that talk about the luck of the Orioles and, particularly, their pythagorean record, obscures the fact that the team changed incrementally over the course of 2012 and the version we saw later in the season was legitimately good, not just lucky. Calling up Manny Machado and getting an unexpectedly good performance from Nate McLouth were sub-headline news items which nonetheless contributed to a team that did outscore its opposition late in the season. It seems, based on the very quiet offseason, that Dan Duquette and Showalter continue to treat the O’s as a work in progress which is better to be tinkered with than overhauled. This gives a lot of O’s fans pause, of course, but it seems smart given how uncertain the AL East is right now.
  • The bullpen was an obvious strength last year, and part of the reason it had to be was that the rotation was not one. Wins don’t matter a heck of a lot, but only one starter won ten games or more last season, and that’s just kinda odd for a playoff team. Jason HammelWei-Yin ChenChris TillmanMiguel Gonzalez and … Jair Jurrjens? Jake Arrieta? Field? Aren’t gonna scare anyone. A couple of someones in that group need to pick up the slack from the bullpen this year. I know many will clamor for Dylan Bundy to come in and save everyone, but it’d be a surprise to see him in the majors before September if he appears in the bigs at all this season. He’s really a 2014 guy, methinks.
  • The offense has some nice top-end-for-their-position talent in Adam Jones, J.J. Hardy and Matt Weiters, but it’s not an especially deep and potent group. Nick Markakis is healthy again and the O’s need him to return to his old form. A full season of Brian Roberts would be nice, but after so much time lost it’s hard to count on him being the Brian Roberts of old. Manny Machado has a ton of potential and a lot of room for improvement, but he’s still a baby. There’s a decent chance that Chris Davis and Nate McLouth remember that they are Chris Davis and Nate McLouth and do not replicate their second half production this year. In other words, the offense is a mixed bag.
  • Wilson Betemit got hurt on Monday and is going to miss at least the first two months of the season. The O’s will miss his production — he hit .302/.357/.502 with 10 homers in 255 at bats against right-handed pitching last season — but it’s worth remembering that he missed most of the end of last season and all of the postseason too, so Baltimore is not in uncharted waters here.

So how are they gonna do?

Like anyone else in this crazy division I could see them winning it all or see them finishing fifth. Sorry, I know that’s a copout, but that’s where the AL East is right now. We’ll call them: Fifth Place, American League East, but please don’t think of that as some sort of damnation. I just say that because Matthew already did the Red Sox and Rays and predicted them fourth and second, respectively, I did the Jays and picked them first, and I’m gonna do the Yankees and have a hard time picking them last ever. Take this preview for what comes before and consider the actual prediction to be the least committed prediction ever.

  1. whitesoxman77 - Mar 26, 2013 at 12:46 PM

    poor Orioles, getting effed over by the man. you guys should have gotten on the same page with these predictions though

  2. proudlycanadian - Mar 26, 2013 at 12:54 PM

    The answer to “THE BIG QUESTION” is YES!

    • psuravens19 - Mar 26, 2013 at 1:12 PM

      How exactly were they lucky?

  3. Panda Claus - Mar 26, 2013 at 12:54 PM

    You had me with you Craig, until you went 5th place [again]. Instead of getting mad at your obvious copout :), I should instead thank you for possibly helping the Orioles yet again fly under the radar of expectations.

    One point you made worth repeating, and few others in the national media seem to remember this, is how much better this team was after adding McLouth and Machado. It really was a night and day difference.

    Ultimately this probably is a toss-up division. I just can’t pick the Jays because seldom does so much assembled talent work that well in their first year together. They might still be a year away. The Red Sox and Yankees haven’t added enough improvements or replaced enough worn parts (respectively) to win either. It’s also fair to say the Orioles could have some drop off their 2012 performance.

    Therefore, I’m picking the Rays to slice through the cloud cover of the AL East. A healthy Longoria for the whole year and that pitching staff of theirs probably has enough to get them to the top.

    • indaburg - Mar 26, 2013 at 1:38 PM

      I hope your pick is right. I am cautiously optimistic about the Rays.

      While I believe this division to be a toss-up as well, I see the Sox as likelier to finish in last place than the Orioles. I know the O’s got lucky in a lot of ways in 2012, but in 2011, I saw the inklings of a potentially good team so their ascension was not a fluke. As for 1st place, it really is too tough to call right now. I love being part of a division with so much parity.

  4. fukpittsburgh - Mar 26, 2013 at 12:54 PM

    2 things: Chris Davis is a 40 bomb guy and I guarantee you the Orioles will have at least 2 starting pitchers with 15 or more wins this year. For all the Oriole fans that know this team and read this, I am willing to bet 100% of them would say the same thing: you really don’t know much about the Orioles. And we won’t forget that you picked them to finish last either.

    • bmorelikeme - Mar 26, 2013 at 2:41 PM

      I’d call Davis more of a 30 Bomb guy, but other than that, I pretty much agree.

      I like the rotation alot, not many sexy names but there’s alot of depth. Hammel if he can stay healthy is a really good pitcher, he just needed to get out of colorado and regain his heavy sinking fastball. Chen/Tillman/Gonzalez all pitched really well down the stretch. The after that theres probably 5 former top prospects vying for one spot.

      The defense played GREAT after bringing up Machado and the lineup will hit.

      What not part 3.

    • bmorelikeme - Mar 26, 2013 at 2:41 PM

      I’d call Davis more of a 30 Bomb guy, but other than that, I pretty much agree.

      I like the rotation alot, not many sexy names but there’s alot of depth. Hammel if he can stay healthy is a really good pitcher, he just needed to get out of colorado and regain his heavy sinking fastball. Chen/Tillman/Gonzalez all pitched really well down the stretch. The after that theres probably 5 former top prospects vying for one spot.

      The defense played GREAT after bringing up Machado and the lineup will hit.

      Why not part 3.

    • Panda Claus - Mar 26, 2013 at 3:10 PM

      All I can say is there are no guarantees–that’s why they play the games.

      While it’s difficult to believe the Orioles only had one 10-game winner with the 93 victories, few would have expected Nick Markakis to need three surgeries when he hardly ever had even a scraped knee before.

      Mark Reynolds was supposed to be a lock for 40+ homers last year and it didn’t happen. You just never know.

  5. psuravens19 - Mar 26, 2013 at 1:14 PM

    After 15 years of losing, I can understand a lot of people not giving this team any credit for last season; but this is a team on the rise. They have a great core of players and building up the farm system with players that will be at the Show this season. Everyone talks about Bundy, and rightfully so, but this kid Gausman is going to be a stud.

  6. philswfc08 - Mar 26, 2013 at 4:35 PM

    Nice post Craig. It has already attracted more O’s fans than Camden Yards did through July last year.

  7. cocheese000 - Mar 26, 2013 at 4:45 PM

    Baseball Prospectus has the Yankees winning the division. But to me Baseball Prospectus has zero credibility to me after they labeled Matt Wieters the biggest bust of all time.

    • churchoftheperpetuallyoutraged - Mar 26, 2013 at 8:12 PM

      First of all, they didn’t. They said he was one of the biggest busts. And considering how high they were on him (and many others, with Matt Wieters facts that rivaled Vin Diesel and Chuck Norris), could you blame them? His best hitting year was 2011 when he went .262/.328.450 for a .778 OPS (113 OPS+).

      This is the same publication that’s PECOTA projection in ’09 had Weiters at .311/.395/.544 which are numbers he hasn’t come close to matching. The guy was projected to be Mike Piazza with a great glove. How could he not be labeled a bust if that’s what was expected?

  8. beachnbaseball - Mar 27, 2013 at 12:08 PM

    Sorry, but the number of 1 run game wins and extra innings wins will not be replicated this year. It was an anomaly. Pure and simple. 2013 shows the Borioles returning to a higher dgree of suckitude and battling the Red Sox for 4th place..

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. G. Stanton (2685)
  2. C. Correa (2632)
  3. H. Ramirez (2621)
  4. G. Springer (2610)
  5. B. Crawford (2402)
  1. M. Teixeira (2391)
  2. H. Pence (2335)
  3. J. Baez (2315)
  4. J. Hamilton (2239)
  5. Y. Puig (2217)