Skip to content

Today that annual diversity-in-baseball study comes out. Take it with a serious grain of salt.

Apr 10, 2013, 10:01 AM EDT

Rico Carty

Today is the day that the annual report from Richard Lapchick’s Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sports at the University of Central Florida comes out.  He’s been doing this for years, and it always gets highlighted in the media, with headlines about how the number of U.S.-born black players in baseball is declining.  Which, yes, it is.  But Lapchick’s report is also normally treated wholly uncritically, with his conclusions being parroted instead of reported, and it really grinds my gears.

It bugs me on a broad level, in that — as I’ve mentioned in this space several times — it looks at the trees but not the forest, noting that while, yes, there are fewer U.S.-born black players in baseball now than there used to, the overall diversity of baseball is up as the game becomes increasingly internationalized.

But it bugs me in a much sharper sense in that I believe the numbers Lapchick puts out are misleading.

They are misleading in that, while his current count of U.S.-born blacks in baseball seems right — he has it at 8.5% — the numbers he and others typically cite for the height of black representation in the game are usually off. He has cited as high as 27% of all players being black, and this number is often repeated as gospel, like it is in today’s USA Today story about it.

Thing is: these are apples and oranges measurements.  Back in the 70s when that 27% number came out, those numbers represented counts of all black players — or people who had sufficiently-black skin to be called “black” according to the view of those doing the counting. This included Latino players like Rico Carty, who happened to be born in the Dominican Republic. Today Carty — or, say, Aroldis Chapman or any other non-U.S.-born black player — wouldn’t be included in Lapchick’s count. Which makes sense because he’s counting only U.S.-born blacks. But he and his media surrogates freely cite the old numbers which did include Latino blacks back in the day.

Friend of mine and frequent HBT commenter Mark Armour is doing some research on this for the Society of American Baseball Research. I’ve not seen the research, but Tyler Kepner notes it in the New York Times today. Armour estimates that the actual height of U.S.-born blacks in the game came in the 1980s and peaked at 19%. See the update below for some of Mark’s additional comments on this.

No, that research does not mean that all things are wonderful. There clearly are fewer U.S.-born black players in baseball today than there were in decades past. But it’s not quite a crisis on the order of magnitude that Lapchick and others portray. And given that they’re not being particularly discerning with their numbers you have to wonder if either sloppiness or agenda-setting is taking precedence over science here.

And that’s my problem with it. Not the underlying idea — I want there to be more blacks in the game; heck, I want EVERYONE to play baseball and anything that can be done to promote it should be – but on the manner in which the problem is portrayed. A manner which seems more calculated to draw attention to the Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sports than it does to the underlying issue.

UPDATE:  Mark Armour chimed in in the comments:

I am not exactly sure where the 27% number came from. My theory had been that the old data was from some newpaper story that counted all dark-skinned players as black, while the new data only counted US black players. However, several years ago this was explored further by the Wall Street Journal, and they determined that the old data is just … bad science. Really bad science.

The real drop in African-Americans (from 17-19% in the 1975-95 period) to half that today is significant enough without the bad data. Baseball is MORE diverse, of course, than every before.

By the way, MLB is very cooperative in the Lapchick study. In fact, they provide all of the data on opening day rosters to Lapchick every year. The writers that imply this is some sort of bigotry on the part of MLB are nuts. It is very clear that MLB is spending lots of time and money on this problem.

This is the WSJ story from 2008.

Latest Posts
  1. The Mets are making a push for Yoenis Cespedes

    Jul 31, 2015, 2:27 PM EDT

    Yoenis Cespedes Getty Images

    This is the third outfielder to whom they’ve been linked in three days. Let’s see if this one takes.

  2. The Blue Jays pick up Ben Revere from the Phillies

    Jul 31, 2015, 2:13 PM EDT

    Ben Revere Ben Revere

    He’s hitting hitting .298/.334/.374 and will likely take over left field duties.

  3. The Cubs, Padres and Red Sox are said to be talking about a three-way deal

    Jul 31, 2015, 2:08 PM EDT

    San Diego Padres Logo

    Jed Hoyer has worked for all three of these teams. He may be in the middle of a big trade involving them all.

  4. Twins trade for Rays reliever Kevin Jepsen

    Jul 31, 2015, 2:05 PM EDT

    Kevin Jepsen Rays Getty Images

    Bullpen help has been an obvious need for Minnesota.

  5. Cubs trade for Dan Haren

    Jul 31, 2015, 1:30 PM EDT

    Dan Haren Dan Haren

    The Cubs get a starter.

  6. 2015 MLB Trade Deadline Tracker

    Jul 31, 2015, 12:30 PM EDT

    150731-Justin-Upton Getty Images

    We’re recapping all of the deals as they come down.

  7. Cardinals add more bullpen help, get Jonathan Broxton from Brewers

    Jul 31, 2015, 12:02 PM EDT

    Jonathan Broxton Brewers Getty Images

    Cardinals’ bullpen is suddenly stacked with closers and ex-closers.

  8. David Price got a flat tire on the way to Toronto

    Jul 31, 2015, 11:11 AM EDT

    david price getty Getty Images

    Maybe he’ll see Daniel Norris coming the other way in his van?

  9. Orioles trade for Brewers outfielder Gerardo Parra

    Jul 31, 2015, 10:39 AM EDT

    Gerardo Parra Brewers Getty Images

    Milwaukee receives a starting pitcher prospect in return.

  10. Now the Yankees said to be “aggressively pursuing” Aroldis Chapman

    Jul 31, 2015, 9:49 AM EDT

    Aroldis Chapman AP

    Or, the very least, want the Padres to think they are so as to bring Craig Kimbrel’s price down.

  11. Red Sox are considering moves for Tyson Ross or Carlos Carrasco

    Jul 31, 2015, 9:25 AM EDT

    red sox logo

    They have the worst ERA in the AL, so any starter would be a nice addition.

  12. Cardinals hoping Matt Holliday will play again this season

    Jul 31, 2015, 9:18 AM EDT

    St. Louis Cardinals v Cincinnati Reds Getty Images

    Another torn quadriceps muscle for the All-Star left fielder.

  13. Padres and Astros said to be “working on something big”

    Jul 31, 2015, 8:55 AM EDT

    astros logo

    I feel like Ken Caminiti has to be involved.

  14. The Cubs and Indians are talking about Carlos Carrasco

    Jul 31, 2015, 8:43 AM EDT

    Carlos Carrasco AP

    He’d be both a 2015 and a future move.

  15. Yankees, Padres said to be working toward a Craig Kimbrel deal

    Jul 31, 2015, 8:18 AM EDT

    Craig Kimbrel Getty Images

    The Yankees bullpen is already a strength. Will it be stronger by 4pm today?

  16. And That Happened: Thursday’s scores and highlights

    Jul 31, 2015, 7:34 AM EDT

    Jason Castro Getty Images

    In a night of several walkoffs — including a walkoff walk — Jason Castro had the biggest, helping Houston complete the sweep of the Angels.

Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. C. Hamels (5805)
  2. C. Gomez (4733)
  3. T. Tulowitzki (4338)
  4. M. Trout (3903)
  5. J. Cueto (3873)
  1. C. Gonzalez (3651)
  2. A. Rodriguez (3611)
  3. D. Price (3492)
  4. T. Clippard (3148)
  5. J. Bruce (3125)