May 3, 2013, 9:28 AM EST
You gotta read Rob Neyer’s latest post. Short version: the Hall of Fame and the Taylor Hooton Foundation funded a survey about public perception of steroids as a national problem. Fine. Not sure why the Hall of Fame cares about such things, but it’s not my money funding it.
The kicker, though: the report on the survey is shocked that the public does not consider steroids to be anywhere near as big a threat to our nation’s youth as things like drinking, eating disorders, drugs, obesity and other things that, you know, ARE REALLY BIG PROBLEMS FOR OUR NATION’S YOUTH.
You can say it’s just a survey, but organizations do surveys and release reports like these for a reason. They want to publicize their cause and beat the drums for awareness and donations and things. And the people beating the drums in this case seem to truly believe that it’s wrong that people don’t think steroids are as big a problem for kids as other things. Which is insane.
Just remember that the next time you hear anything about steroids from either the Hall of Fame, the Hooton Foundation or writers citing them as sources when making anti-PED arguments. Their perspective is skewed. Irresponsibly so, I’d argue.
- UPDATE: Starlin Castro’s agent denies his client’s involvement in Dominican Republic shooting 17
- Merry Christmas from HBT! 74
- THE YEAR IN REVIEW: HBT’s most commented-upon stories of the year 86
- The Yankees are treating Alex Rodriguez differently than they treated Derek Jeter. So what? 40
- Braves sign setup man Jason Grilli to two-year contract 15
- My Imaginary Hall of Fame Ballot 120
- Phil Hughes signs a three-year extension with the Twins 27
- The Padres have talked to the Phillies about Cole Hamels 24
- Curt Schilling goes after Obama, says Ronald Reagan would watch “The Interview” (243)
- My Imaginary Hall of Fame Ballot (120)
- Today’s specious anti-Mike Piazza-for-the-Hall-Fame argument (96)
- THE YEAR IN REVIEW: HBT’s most commented-upon stories of the year (86)
- Phillies GM told Ryan Howard they’d be better off “not with him but without him” (85)