Skip to content

Rawlings is amping up their batting helmets

May 16, 2013, 10:00 AM EDT

Kurt Suzuki

From a Today Show story, Rawlings — the leading maker of batting helmets — is raising standards across the board:

Now the company is designing a set of helmets with the age of the batter in mind. There’s a helmet for younger players that is lighter and designed to withstand a 70 mph hit. For 12-16 year olds, helmets are a bit heavier, but can withstand the force of an 80 mph strike. Helmets for high school and college age kids can take a 90 mph impact, while those rated for major league baseball players can withstand a 100 mph hit.

You can’t prevent all injuries, obviously, but it’s good to see this kind of thing.

  1. heyblueyoustink - May 16, 2013 at 10:29 AM

    I don’t see how this will help the HBPiD metric.

    Then again, I suppose that’s not it’s intention.

    Moving on……. carefully.

    • historiophiliac - May 16, 2013 at 12:42 PM

      Man, everyone seems so angry today? What happened?

      • heyblueyoustink - May 16, 2013 at 12:56 PM

        Don’t know, not here :-)

      • historiophiliac - May 16, 2013 at 12:59 PM

        Spread a little of that brotherly love, will ya? I log out for a bit and come back to find people crabbing at each other.

      • heyblueyoustink - May 16, 2013 at 1:48 PM

        Can’t say it enough, every day you wake up above dirt is a good day. I try to limit my anger, especially in the forum of a baseball blog.

      • historiophiliac - May 16, 2013 at 5:28 PM

        How seriously petty and burned up do you think a person has to be just to go around thumbing down someone’s comments? That’s really pathetic.

  2. hittfamily - May 16, 2013 at 10:32 AM

    “…but can withstand the force of an 80 mph strike. ”

    Who wrote this, Ann Curry’s empty chair? You don’t usually need a helmet for strikes.

    Also, Craig, bro, the Today Show! Really? Is our next story going to be from Judge Joe or Steve Wilcos?

    • jwbiii - May 16, 2013 at 10:41 AM

      I think they’re using the word “strike” in the sense of “a pitch which strikes you in the head,” not in the sense of “a pitch in the strike zone.”

    • brewcrewfan54 - May 16, 2013 at 11:19 AM

      He’s giving credit to where I’m assuming he came across the story. Citing sources is what weiters are supposed to do unless you work for ESPN.

      • DJ MC - May 16, 2013 at 12:22 PM

        Matt Wieters doesn’t cite sources. Sources cite Matt Wieters.

  3. astrofaninkc - May 16, 2013 at 12:46 PM

    That’s great, but what does Kurt Suzuki’s old catcher’s helmet have to do with it?

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. B. Crawford (2761)
  2. Y. Puig (2435)
  3. C. Correa (2398)
  4. G. Stanton (2368)
  5. G. Springer (2279)
  1. H. Pence (2197)
  2. J. Hamilton (2094)
  3. M. Teixeira (1885)
  4. H. Ramirez (1876)
  5. J. Fernandez (1857)