Jun 10, 2013, 12:48 PM EST
There are always lots of stories about NFL war rooms, but I haven’t seen nearly as much about what life is like for MLB teams on draft day.
Corey Brock of MLB.com provides an interesting look at the Padres’ war room. Here’s an excerpt:
A name is called out and a video of a player shot by the area scout himself or cross-checker plays on the video board in the room. The area scout, for example, Salvo, who has been with the Padres since 2008, covers Alabama, Mississippi, southwest Tennessee and the Florida Panhandle, talks about a player — his player — and then is peppered with questions about him. …
As the group discusses a high school pitcher from Southern California, someone in the room asked if the player in question “has an overactive bladder.” The room erupted in laughs. It seems the player heads to the restroom following each inning and no one is quite certain why.
Each brief synopsis of a player finishes with one simple question: “Are you all-in on him?”
Check out Brock’s entire article, because it’s a good read about an under-covered aspect of baseball.
- Hector Olivera’s camp denies any damage to ulnar collateral ligament 3
- UPDATE: Hunter Pence out 6-8 weeks with fracture in left forearm 21
- MLBPA: leaks are from people “who want to see Josh Hamilton hurt personally and professionally” 19
- Suspending Josh Hamilton for a year would be obscene 145
- Report: MLB panel split on rehab for Josh Hamilton; one-year suspension is in play 45
- Joc Pederson goes 2-for-2 in Cactus League debut 6
- Braves scratch Mike Minor from start with more shoulder problems 6
- Daniel Murphy on Billy Bean: “I do disagree with the fact that Billy is a homosexual” 373
- Daniel Murphy on Billy Bean: “I do disagree with the fact that Billy is a homosexual” (373)
- Suspending Josh Hamilton for a year would be obscene (145)
- Curt Schilling lowers the boom on some men tweeting threats against his daughter (137)
- That facts of Josh Hamilton’s case should not be a matter of public record (91)
- Billy Bean responds to Daniel Murphy’s comments (90)