Jun 10, 2013, 12:02 PM EDT
The Boston Globe did something cool: it timed absolutely everything in a recent Red Sox series to try and figure out why games are so much longer now than they used to be. For comparison, they watched a 1969 Orioles-Red Sox game too to see what player habits and game flow was different then than it is now.
I won’t spoil it for you — go read the story — but be happy to know that it’s a refreshing use of empiricism rather than the “let’s just make some broad assumptions and ultimately blame one thing for a given phenomenon rather than realize that almost every complicated system is impacted by multiple variables” approach almost all sports analysis takes these days.
Oh, and Tony LaRussa and Hawk Harrellson get blamed in part too, and that much is satisfying.
- No, Ned Yost didn’t “out-manage” Bruce Bochy. His players played better 21
- At least Hunter Strickland entertained us last night 17
- Royals even up World Series with 7-2 Game 2 victory 26
- Craig Kimbrel wins Trevor Hoffman Award; Greg Holland gets Mariano Rivera Award 5
- World Series, Game 2: Giants vs. Royals lineups 10
- HBT Daily: Are the Royals doomed, doomed, doomed? 11
- Giants inhaling the air of superiority after Game 1 7
- What’s in a name? “Big Game” James did not come up big for Kansas City 23
- So, if you’re not a fan of the Royals or Giants, who ya got? (129)
- Erroneous Narrative Alert: no, the Giants are not a “gritty,” anti-stats organization (121)
- Pedro Martinez has some opinions about who the new “face of baseball” is (112)
- PANTY RAID! Homeland Security agents confiscate unlicensed Kansas City Royals underwear (103)
- “The Kansas City Royals Are the Future of Baseball” — someone actually said that. (93)