Skip to content

The San Jose lawsuit against Major League Baseball should be thrown out of court

Jun 18, 2013, 4:32 PM EDT

Screen Shot 2013-06-18 at 4.25.22 PM

So I’ve read over the lawsuit filed by San Jose against Major League Baseball. Initial reaction: it’s more full of crap than Bob Melvin’s office was on Sunday afternoon.

The essence of the suit: Major League Baseball is a monopoly. It should be an unlawful monopoly. This would-be unlawful monopoly is preventing the Athletics from moving to San Jose and that has caused San Jose all manner of financial harm.

Which, yes, sounds reasonable. Major League Baseball is anti-competitive and does have a monopoly that should go the way of the dodo and vaudeville for the simple reason that it serves no purpose as noble and grand as either the dodo or vaudeville did.  But the suit is not anything that should pass legal muster here, and I believe it will go down in flames.

As I said in the earlier post, courts do not entertain lawsuits from parties without standing to sue and the city of San Jose hasn’t asserted anything in this complaint that persuades me that they have standing. Or that they have been damaged in any way that a court will consider worthy of redress. Broadly speaking, they have claimed that (a) they have a contract with the owners of the Oakland A’s with which Major League Baseball’s actions have interfered; and (b) that the city has incurred or will incur — note the “will” — financial damages as a result of the A’s not moving to San Jose. Let’s break those down:

The tortious interference with a contract claim:  The contract claim is baed on an option agreement entered into in 2011 between the A’s owners and San Jose for the purchase of some land on which a ballpark would be built. The A’s paid San Jose $50,000 for the option. It expires this fall. If they want to keep the option open for another year it’s another $25,000. If the A’s owners were to buy the land, they can do it for between $6 million and $7 million. Nothing in the option agreement, however, promises that the A’s will actually move. It doesn’t even promise that they’ll buy the land. Just that they have the option to do so.

San Jose, however, seems to be attempting to bootstrap this option into a promise that the A’s would actually move there and that MLB’s rules preventing the A’s from moving have thus interfered with that expectation. That’s a bridge too far. A bridge longer than the Dumbarton, actually. The only guarantee San Jose gets out of that contract is $50-75K. The only thing it’s giving up is the right to sell that land for the period of the option. Major League Baseball has not stopped the A’s from paying their $50-75K.

San Jose’s insistence that more has been lost here is based on an assertion that the A’s have indicated a willingness to move to San Jose. Well, yes, they have. But they haven’t done anything to act on it yet because they know they can’t. At the minimum, I would think a court would need to have evidence that the A’s actually took a concrete step to pay San Jose $7 million for that land, to actually move to San Jose only to have had Major League Baseball stop that from happening. There is no suggestion, however, that any such evidence exists.

The financial damages: It’s all future tense. San Jose would have gotten increased tax revenue, would have gotten good paying stadium construction jobs, would have seen economic development and would have had a more healthy municipal budget had the A’s moved. Those are all speculative, prospective damages* not actual damages, and courts are not in the business of providing redress for speculative, prospective damages. Tomorrow Lew Wolff could say “you know what? I always wanted to move the A’s to Bakersfield. We’re moving to Bakersfield.” If he did that, San Jose would have no recourse. So they certainly have no recourse against Major League Baseball for preventing a speculative A’s-to-San Jose move.

*Probably also worth noting that the complaint spends a lot of time talking about all the economic benefits of ballpark development. These benefits have been largely debunked. I sorta hope this suit goes far, however, so that MLB would find itself in the odd position of having to explain how such damages are illusory, contrary to their tack for the past 25 years or so.

I think Major League Baseball’s antitrust exemption is abhorrent. I wish it were gone and think, in the right lawsuit, it could be defeated. If the A’s had filed this suit, for example, claiming that MLB is preventing them from moving and that MLB’s insistence that they stay in Oakland has caused them financial damages, I think it would have a puncher’s chance. And I’d be shaking my pompoms, cheering it on. But they didn’t file it. San Jose did. And San Jose has no legal rights that seem remotely impinged upon here.

Which, it should be worth noting, may be the idea. It’s quite possible that this suit is more a political document than a legal one, with San Jose’s mayor trying to focus attention on the languishing A’s-to-San Jose thing and to get public opinion on the side of the A’s and the city.  Maybe this will do that, maybe it won’t. I’d have to know the political dynamics of the Bay Area better than I do to have an idea.

But I do think that for it to have any practical use in creating leverage it has to at least present a legal threat, and this doesn’t do that. Indeed, I think Major League Baseball is way more worried about losing its antitrust exemption than any bad PR that can come out of Oakland, so they’re likely to fight this suit until it’s dead.

Which should be quickly. Because the suit is no better than the stuff bubbling up through the Oakland Coliseum’s pipes and should be thrown out.

Latest Posts
  1. Reds activate Homer Bailey from disabled list to make season debut

    Apr 18, 2015, 1:01 PM EDT

    Homer Bailey AP

    Reds right-hander Homer Bailey landed on the disabled list at the end of spring training while he completed his rehab from surgery to repair a tear of the flexor tendon in his elbow, but he has been activated to make his season debut this afternoon against the Cardinals.

  2. Giancarlo Stanton says “the fire is not there” with Marlins

    Apr 18, 2015, 12:18 PM EDT

    Miami Marlins v Atlanta Braves Getty Images

    The Marlins are off to a disappointing 3-8 start this season and slugger Giancarlo Stanton doesn’t like what he has seen.

  3. Report: Angels and Josh Hamilton discussing a number of scenarios to resolve dispute

    Apr 18, 2015, 12:10 PM EDT

    Josh Hamilton AP

    Josh Hamilton’s future with the Angels is in question, as the two sides are discussing a number of scenarios to resolve their dispute.

  4. Victor Martinez back in Tigers lineup for first time since last Sunday

    Apr 18, 2015, 11:29 AM EDT

    cD05ODdlNmNhY2MwMjRlZWQzNTJhM2ViYTQ1Y2VlY2YzOCZnPTA3YWM0OGUxZTdmMjA0M2RmODI4MTg2N2M5NDVjYjRh Getty Images

    V-Mart took a few days off this week to rest his knee.

  5. Indians keeping Danny Salazar in starting rotation, moving Zach McAllister to bullpen

    Apr 18, 2015, 10:45 AM EDT

    Danny Salazar AP

    Danny Salazar was optioned to Triple-A after struggling during spring training, but he’ll now get an extended opportunity in Cleveland’s rotation.

  6. Josh Collmenter threw the first shutout of the 2015 MLB season last night

    Apr 18, 2015, 10:00 AM EDT

    Josh Collmenter AP

    It’s safe to say that nobody would have guessed this one.

  7. Settling the Score: Friday’s results

    Apr 18, 2015, 8:51 AM EDT

    Bartolo Colon AP

    A quick recap of a busy Friday around MLB, including the exploits of Mets right-hander Bartolo Colon.

  8. Josh Hamilton’s teammates say he’s in great shape and ready to play

    Apr 18, 2015, 7:17 AM EDT

    Josh Hamilton Josh Hamilton

    There are, increasingly, two Angels camps when it comes to the Josh Hamilton matter: Arte Moreno and everybody else.

  9. Josh Hamilton’s California house is for sale

    Apr 18, 2015, 6:49 AM EDT

    Screen Shot 2015-04-18 at 6.46.17 AM

    When Angels owner Arte Moreno was asked if Josh Hamilton would ever play for the Angels again, he said “I will not say that.” With this listing, perhaps Hamilton is saying so himself.

  10. Ruben Amaro on Andy Oliver’s decision to elect free agency: “I think it was a very foolish move on his part, but that’s OK.”

    Apr 17, 2015, 11:30 PM EDT

    Andy Oliver Andy Oliver

    Ruben Amaro seems a little upset that Andy Oliver didn’t want to start the season with Triple-A Lehigh Valley.

  11. Mets will bring back Rafael Montero as a starting pitcher near the end of April

    Apr 17, 2015, 10:50 PM EDT

    Rafael Montero Rafael Montero

    The Mets will be stretching out Rafael Montero as a starter at Triple-A Las Vegas before bringing him back to the majors for a spot start against the Marlins.

  12. Mike Trout hit his 100th career home run to become the youngest member of the 100 HR/100 SB club

    Apr 17, 2015, 9:58 PM EDT

    Mike Trout Mike Trout

    Mike Trout became the youngest to join the 100/100 club with a two-run home run on Friday night.

  13. Make that two: Alex Rodriguez hits second homer of the night, giving him 658 for his career

    Apr 17, 2015, 9:17 PM EDT

    Alex Rodriguez Alex Rodriguez

    Alex Rodriguez has two home runs on Friday night, leaving him two round-trippers shy of tying Willie Mays for fourth on the all-time home run leaderboard.

  14. Video: Matt Carpenter leaps over Brayan Pena to score on a sacrifice fly

    Apr 17, 2015, 9:11 PM EDT

    Matt Carpenter Matt Carpenter

    Matt Carpenter made a cool maneuver to score the tying run in the bottom of the first against the Reds on Friday night.

  15. Ubaldo Jimenez was ejected, wrongfully, for hitting Pablo Sandoval with a pitch

    Apr 17, 2015, 8:45 PM EDT

    Ubaldo Jimenez Getty Images

    Neither side was warned, but Ubaldo Jimenez was ejected for hitting Pablo Sandoval with a pitch on Friday evening.

  16. Alex Rodriguez hit his 657th career home run

    Apr 17, 2015, 7:50 PM EDT

    a-rod reuters yankees Reuters

    A-Rod is now three home runs away from tying Willie Mays for fourth on the all-time home run leaderboard.

  17. The Tigers are 9-1. Does that mean anything?

    Apr 17, 2015, 7:15 PM EDT

    Jose Iglesias, Nick Castellanos, Ian Kinsler, Andrew Romine Jose Iglesias, Nick Castellanos, Ian Kinsler, Andrew Romine

    Since 2000, how often have teams that started 9-1 went on to have playoff success?

  18. Mark Buehrle is considering retiring after the 2015 season

    Apr 17, 2015, 6:20 PM EDT

    Mark Buehrle Mark Buehrle

    Mark Buehrle, baseball’s timeless left-hander, is reportedly considering retiring after the season.

  19. Mike Scioscia is concerned that Josh Hamilton is not “getting the help he needs”

    Apr 17, 2015, 5:28 PM EDT

    josh hamilton angels getty Getty Images

    Well, he’s certainly not getting the support of the Los Angeles Angels.

Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. D. Salazar (3306)
  2. D. Span (3277)
  3. B. Gardner (3218)
  4. D. Mesoraco (3173)
  5. C. Gomez (3066)