Skip to content

Eric Hinske’s suspension reduced to one game

Jun 25, 2013, 3:00 PM EDT

Eric Hinske received a five-game suspension following the big Dbacks-Dodgers brawl a couple of weeks ago. Many thought it was unjust as Hinske never threw a punch and was, by most accounts, trying to be a peacemaker. Apparently that argument carried some weight at the league office:

 

That’s a pretty significant reduction. Normally a game or two is shaved off on appeal. You have to figure that MLB realized that they blew that one.

  1. tanzkommandant - Jun 25, 2013 at 3:05 PM

    Fagan, a known bigot from his time in the minor leagues, undoubtedly had a hand in the original suspension. It’s good to see his brand of Jim Crow justice will not prevail in this case.

    • daveitsgood - Jun 25, 2013 at 3:43 PM

      “Jim Crow justice” – I do not think it means what you think it means

      • tanzkommandant - Jun 25, 2013 at 9:38 PM

        It would appear you & several others are the ones mistaken.

    • tigersfandan - Jun 28, 2013 at 9:45 AM

      Fagan has nothing to do with this. He was the umpire credited with the ejections. Hinske was not ejected from the game.

  2. skids003 - Jun 25, 2013 at 3:10 PM

    All I could figure out was that he isn’t a “star” and they needed to set some examples. He clearly tried to make peace.

  3. fatediesel - Jun 25, 2013 at 3:58 PM

    Still 1 game too many. There were plenty of people in the brawl (namely Puig) that did worse than Hinske.

  4. wheels579 - Jun 25, 2013 at 6:54 PM

    I’ve never understood the concept of a league issuing suspensions that routinely become reduced upon appeal. MLB almost never upholds the initial suspension. This Hinske case proves their system for determining length is a joke. If they were willing to reduce it from 5 to just one game, instead of wasting everybody’s time they should have given Hinske one game and let him decide whether he wants to appeal that.

    • flamethrower101 - Jun 25, 2013 at 7:48 PM

      It’s Bud Selig. Are you really shocked?

  5. badintent - Jun 25, 2013 at 11:53 PM

    Why is this guy still in the MLB ? He had a decent Rookie year hundreds of years ago. Then he hit AAA numbers after it.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Who's outside looking in on playoffs?
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. R. Castillo (2974)
  2. M. Trout (2071)
  3. D. Ortiz (2068)
  4. A. Pagan (2059)
  5. A. Pujols (2015)
  1. J. Hamilton (1937)
  2. N. Arenado (1876)
  3. G. Stanton (1842)
  4. S. Pearce (1836)
  5. H. Ramirez (1829)