Skip to content

Competitors squawk, but MLBPA unlikely to punish ACES for Biogenesis clients

Aug 6, 2013, 4:31 PM EDT

Sam Seth Levinson Getty Images

I reported yesterday that, despite the fact that the majority of the players disciplined in the Biogenesis scandal are (or were) represented by the Levinson brothers’ ACES agency, Major League Baseball and the MLBPA was unlikely to take any disciplinary action against the agency. The reason: there is no evidence suggesting that the agency was aware that its players were utilizing Biogenesis. Rather, it was a former consultant, Juan Carlos Nunez, who served as the vector between the clinic and the players. ACES was censured by the MLBPA for its failure to supervise Nunez and Nunez has been fired.

Chris Cotillo of MLB Daily Dish writes today, however, that competing agencies are not happy about this, and quotes many of ACES’ competitors calling for it to be disciplined. They are skeptical of the claim that Nunez was some rogue and all claim that, even if the union doesn’t do anything to punish them, they will lose clients through natural attrition and the sense among players that ACES was a bad actor in the Biogenesis affair.

Which, OK, everyone is entitled to an opinion on this. And yes, it looks pretty bad that one agency was so well-represented.  But I’ll observe that these are competitors to ACES talking and there is nothing that brings out sports agents’ teeth like some blood in the water.

Most fans don’t pay attention to the back-and-forth between agents that goes on, but those who do know that every time one agency is in the news for something even remotely negative, other agents come out of the woodwork to pile on. Ask Paul Kinzer about the coverage he got when he got into a public tiff with Francisco Rodriguez. Ask Scott Boras when he had clients still unsigned late into spring training in the past couple of years. There are always stories quoting competing agents when that stuff happens, talking about how the guy in the spotlight really isn’t doing his clients right. With the implicit statement that his clients should and will shop around for new representation. For cryin’ out loud, we now have (quasi) agents recording dis tracks about their perceived competition. It’s a brutal business.

None of which is to say that the ire at ACES isn’t natural and even understandable. They aren’t likely to be penalized by MLBPA over it all, but one can see how it other agents might be bent out of shape.  It is to say, though, that I’d be way more surprised if ACES’ competitors didn’t come after them than to see what they’re saying now. That would be truly unusual.

  1. yankeepunk3000 - Aug 6, 2013 at 4:49 PM

    I wonder when this “Rogue” was fired he was given a nice parting gift. Like a shit ton of money to say he worked alone… easy to say a lot would of done it for the cash.

  2. koufaxmitzvah - Aug 6, 2013 at 4:52 PM

    Nothing like Shark Week.

  3. chacochicken - Aug 6, 2013 at 5:04 PM

    quasi just isn’t used enough in everyday speech. I’d also like more “pseudo” as well.

    • itsyourceiling - Aug 6, 2013 at 5:18 PM

      You obviously don’t have small children addicted to Octonauts then. Lucky bastard.

  4. mikedi33 - Aug 6, 2013 at 6:38 PM

    If I ever am on trail for anything I want Craig on the jury. He does not hold anyone responsible for their actions.

    • zzalapski - Aug 6, 2013 at 7:38 PM

      If you’re on trial for anything involving reading comprehension, it wouldn’t matter who was on the jury.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Do the Angels have any weaknesses?
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. G. Stanton (3752)
  2. A. Rizzo (2593)
  3. B. Belt (2446)
  4. R. Castillo (2344)
  5. J. Hamilton (2225)
  1. A. Pujols (2132)
  2. C. Young (2122)
  3. B. Gardner (2048)
  4. H. Ryu (2030)
  5. E. Gattis (1892)