Sep 7, 2013, 10:05 AM EST
The San Jose-Major League baseball lawsuit continues, with San Jose filing a response to Major League Baseball’s motion to dismiss. Major League Baseball will get a final reply and a hearing on the matter is set for October 4. The Mercury-News has a summary of it all.
Well, maybe not all. For while it does deal with the arguments the two sides have lobbed back and forth about whether Major League Baseball is entitled to maintain its antitrust exemption, nowhere in the story does it mention Major League Baseball’s better, stronger argument about how the city of San Jose doesn’t have legal standing to challenge it. I’ve talked about that extensively.
I believe that, if for some reason the court decides that San Jose does have standing, the anti-trust exemption and Major League Baseball could be in serious legal trouble here. But that’s a huge, unlikely “if,” and I am having a really hard time seeing how San Jose gets over that threshold.
But boy howdy if they do, get the popcorn, because this will be a total blast.
- My Imaginary Hall of Fame Ballot 69
- Phil Hughes signs a three-year extension with the Twins 23
- The Padres have talked to the Phillies about Cole Hamels 23
- Why is John Smoltz a shoo-in for the Hall of Fame? 63
- Phillies GM told Ryan Howard they’d be better off “not with him but without him” 85
- Trea Turner’s agent is unhappy his client is in limbo after trade to Nationals 48
- Nexen Heroes accept Jung-Ho Kang posting fee from unidentified MLB team 37
- Giants acquire Casey McGehee from the Marlins 16
- Bud Selig will get a $6 million a year pension. Which is obscene. (145)
- The United States will seek to normalize relations with Cuba (144)
- Rays, Padres, Nationals agree to 11-player trade (97)
- St. Petersburg City Council votes down deal to allow Rays to look for new stadium site (90)
- Phillies GM told Ryan Howard they’d be better off “not with him but without him” (85)