Oct 11, 2013, 2:25 PM EST
Back when the suit was filed, this is how I figured it would go:
Judge dismisses federal antitrust claims in San Jose lawsuit against baseball, allows state tort claims to move forward #As
— Eric Fisher (@EricFisherSBJ) October 11, 2013
I have not seen the ruling yet, but this is, in all likelihood, a bad thing for San Jose, no matter how it is spun as a “victory” and a means with which to obtain the right for the Oakland A’s to move to San Jose. If you have tort claims you get damages. Which is money, not an order saying that a team can move someplace. If the anti-trust exemption is still in place — and with the claims dismissed, one figures they are — Major League Baseball and the Giants can still maintain their position that the A’s are barred from Giants territory.
Obviously more updates after I see the order.
UPDATE: My analysis here.
- Phil Hughes signs a three-year extension with the Twins 19
- The Padres have talked to the Phillies about Cole Hamels 23
- Why is John Smoltz a shoo-in for the Hall of Fame? 62
- Phillies GM told Ryan Howard they’d be better off “not with him but without him” 85
- Trea Turner’s agent is unhappy his client is in limbo after trade to Nationals 48
- Nexen Heroes accept Jung-Ho Kang posting fee from unidentified MLB team 37
- Giants acquire Casey McGehee from the Marlins 16
- The Padres have given their fans something to talk about. Which is badly needed in San Diego. 64
- Bud Selig will get a $6 million a year pension. Which is obscene. (145)
- The United States will seek to normalize relations with Cuba (144)
- Rays, Padres, Nationals agree to 11-player trade (97)
- Chase Headley signs a four-year deal with the Yankees worth at least $52 million. (95)
- St. Petersburg City Council votes down deal to allow Rays to look for new stadium site (90)