Oct 11, 2013, 2:25 PM EDT
Back when the suit was filed, this is how I figured it would go:
Judge dismisses federal antitrust claims in San Jose lawsuit against baseball, allows state tort claims to move forward #As
— Eric Fisher (@EricFisherSBJ) October 11, 2013
I have not seen the ruling yet, but this is, in all likelihood, a bad thing for San Jose, no matter how it is spun as a “victory” and a means with which to obtain the right for the Oakland A’s to move to San Jose. If you have tort claims you get damages. Which is money, not an order saying that a team can move someplace. If the anti-trust exemption is still in place — and with the claims dismissed, one figures they are — Major League Baseball and the Giants can still maintain their position that the A’s are barred from Giants territory.
Obviously more updates after I see the order.
UPDATE: My analysis here.
- Will Smith’s ejection once again shows baseball’s silly approach to foreign substance rules 30
- And That Happened: Thursday’s scores and highlights 35
- Who really owns a home run ball? 60
- The story behind the Nationals squirting chocolate syrup on each other after big wins 43
- And That Happened: Wednesday’s scores and highlights 128
- Bryce Harper on Marvin Hudson ejection: “I don’t think 40,000 people came to watch him ump” 128
- Bryce Harper ejected for second time in a week 122
- Dodgers left-hander Hyun-Jin Ryu to have season-ending shoulder surgery 8
- Bryce Harper on Marvin Hudson ejection: “I don’t think 40,000 people came to watch him ump” (128)
- And That Happened: Wednesday’s scores and highlights (128)
- Bryce Harper ejected for second time in a week (122)
- GM Dan Jennings to be named the Marlins new manager. And it’s a terrible idea. (111)
- And That Happened: Tuesday’s scores and highlights (101)