Oct 11, 2013, 2:25 PM EST
Back when the suit was filed, this is how I figured it would go:
Judge dismisses federal antitrust claims in San Jose lawsuit against baseball, allows state tort claims to move forward #As
— Eric Fisher (@EricFisherSBJ) October 11, 2013
I have not seen the ruling yet, but this is, in all likelihood, a bad thing for San Jose, no matter how it is spun as a “victory” and a means with which to obtain the right for the Oakland A’s to move to San Jose. If you have tort claims you get damages. Which is money, not an order saying that a team can move someplace. If the anti-trust exemption is still in place — and with the claims dismissed, one figures they are — Major League Baseball and the Giants can still maintain their position that the A’s are barred from Giants territory.
Obviously more updates after I see the order.
UPDATE: My analysis here.
- Yasmany Tomas signs a six-year, $68.5 million deal with the Diamondbacks 86
- No, the Red Sox signing Pablo and Hanley is not proof that baseball needs a salary cap 163
- Red Sox announce four-year, $88 million deal with Hanley Ramirez, DFA Juan Francisco 35
- The Cubs have offered Jon Lester “north of $135 million” 68
- Pablo Sandoval’s deal: five years, $98 million plus an option 43
- Kyle Seager, Mariners close to $100 million extension 26
- The 2015 Hall of Fame ballot is out — Randy Johnson, Pedro Martinez are new on the ballot 286
- So what would the Red Sox look like with Hanley Ramirez and Pablo Sandoval? 49
- The 2015 Hall of Fame ballot is out — Randy Johnson, Pedro Martinez are new on the ballot (286)
- No, the Red Sox signing Pablo and Hanley is not proof that baseball needs a salary cap (163)
- More Hall of Fame ballots like Adam Rubin’s please (140)
- Report: Pablo Sandoval chose the Red Sox over the Giants because he felt disrespected (138)
- UPDATE: The Pablo Sandoval-Red Sox deal is done, pending a physical (133)