Dec 10, 2013, 5:14 PM EDT
Major League Baseball has apparently made it its mission to reduce the amount of money teams can spend on international and amateur talent. There are now hard caps and slots and it has made it much harder for teams to build on the cheap as opposed to going out into the free agent market. Because, after all, even without the signing caps, far less overall money was spent on international free agents and amateurs than on established major leaguers.
Well, now they’re reducing the international money even further. Ben Badler of Baseball America reports that teams will have $300,000 less to spend on international signees beginning in the 2014-15 signing period.
That reduction comes in the form of the up to six $50,000 exempted bonuses available to each team. The way those worked was, if the team had tapped out its entire overall signing bonus pool, they could offer up to $50,000 to six players who they may have missed previously. Now that’s being eliminated.
What the point of all of that is is beyond me, but it seems crazy to me that Major League Baseball thinks it’s priority to take a mere $50K away from some kid in the Dominican Republic when so much more money — multiples of 1000 or more — is being spent elsewhere.
- 2015 Preview: Cincinnati Reds 0
- The average Major League Baseball salary this year will be more than $4 million — a record 11
- 2015 Preview: Tampa Bay Rays 17
- The Cubs assign Kris Bryant and Addison Russell to the minors, option Javier Baez as well 70
- 2015 Preview: Arizona Diamondbacks 8
- 2015 Preview: Toronto Blue Jays 69
- Mariners prospect Victor Sanchez has died 26
- 2015 Preview: Chicago White Sox 15
- Ex-Cardinals outfielder Curt Ford was assaulted in St. Louis and told to “go back to Ferguson” (122)
- David Ortiz: “Nobody in MLB history has been tested for PEDs more than me” (118)
- The MLBPA releases a statement on Kris Bryant, mentions possible litigation (90)
- Rob Manfred says it would be hard to reinstate Pete Rose in a limited way (89)
- Did David Ortiz admit to more than he realized with his Players’ Tribune editorial? (88)