Feb 4, 2014, 10:51 AM EDT
As expected, the MLBPA has asked the court to strike A-Rod’s claims against it. Its argument: A-Rod can’t claim he didn’t get a good defense from the union given that his suspension was reduced and given the quality of its argument and briefing in the case. A-Rod has until Friday to respond.
This could drag on for a while, of course. For whatever reason A-Rod didn’t ask for an injunction to have his suspension put on hold, which would have accelerated matters considerably. Probably because he knows he’s likely to lose, I imagine, but how having a protracted legal battle that gets him to the same place helps anyone other than his lawyers is beyond me.
- VIDEO: Derek Jeter passes Carl Yastrzemski for seventh on all-time hits list 14
- Ray Rice is awful, but let’s not pretend baseball has a great record on domestic violence 75
- And That Happened: Sunday’s scores and highlights 49
- Mariners’ interest in Matt Kemp is “very real” 29
- Astros players upset over Mark Appel’s promotion to Double-A, bullpen session in Houston 45
- Four theories about the Hall of Fame voting changes 24
- Troy Tulowitzki is visiting a sports hernia surgeon 10
- Settling the Score: Saturday’s results 29
- Expert’s Corner: How to troll fans of all 30 teams (201)
- Verducci: baseball should think about an “illegal defense” rule to combat shifts (165)
- Yankees acquire Chase Headley from Padres (108)
- David Ortiz passes Carl Yastrzemski on the all-time home run list — is he a Hall of Famer? (92)
- Ten years ago today the Alex Rodriguez-Jason Varitek brawl changed the narrative of the Sox-Yankees rivalry (88)