Apr 24, 2014, 10:32 AM EDT
As I’ve stated several times in the past, I have am generally anti-DH for personal and subjective reasons, but I accept that it makes more logical sense for both leagues to have the DH. And I think it’ll happen eventually, my personal and subjective opinions notwithstanding.
To the extent people want to argue about it on objective, as opposed to subjective grounds, however, here’s a new data point for your consideration: the DH does not cause the games to go longer in any appreciable way. Carl Bialik of FiveThirtyEight looks at the data, and it’s pretty interesting.
You may now post 100 comments in which you try to disguise your personal preferences regarding the DH as objective criteria. I’ll start: it has been scientifically proven that liking the DH causes most cancers. Period.
- MLBPA files grievance against Astros in regard to draft pick situation 16
- The eyes have it: Thomas’ greatness built on patience 11
- Expert’s Corner: How to troll fans of all 30 teams 182
- Mariners re-acquire Kendrys Morales from Twins for Stephen Pryor 21
- A’s designate $10 million reliever Jim Johnson for assignment 34
- Everything you need to know about next week’s trade deadline 35
- Impending free agent Jon Lester won’t talk contract with the Red Sox until after the season 19
- Expert’s Corner: How to troll fans of all 30 teams (182)
- Verducci: baseball should think about an “illegal defense” rule to combat shifts (162)
- Yankees acquire Chase Headley from Padres (108)
- Who is the next Face of Baseball? (97)
- David Ortiz passes Carl Yastrzemski on the all-time home run list — is he a Hall of Famer? (92)