Apr 24, 2014, 10:32 AM EDT
As I’ve stated several times in the past, I have am generally anti-DH for personal and subjective reasons, but I accept that it makes more logical sense for both leagues to have the DH. And I think it’ll happen eventually, my personal and subjective opinions notwithstanding.
To the extent people want to argue about it on objective, as opposed to subjective grounds, however, here’s a new data point for your consideration: the DH does not cause the games to go longer in any appreciable way. Carl Bialik of FiveThirtyEight looks at the data, and it’s pretty interesting.
You may now post 100 comments in which you try to disguise your personal preferences regarding the DH as objective criteria. I’ll start: it has been scientifically proven that liking the DH causes most cancers. Period.
- And That Happened: Tuesday’s scores and highlights 0
- Andrew McCutchen departs game versus Cardinals after aggravating injured left rib cage 2
- Mariners extend general manager Jack Zduriencik’s contract 12
- Money, money, money (and Bud Selig’s nirvana) 14
- These days, the correlation between payroll and winning is historically weak 60
- And That Happened: Monday’s scores and highlights 49
- Report: Cubs calling up top prospect outfielder Jorge Soler 40
- Shin-Soo Choo to undergo season-ending bone spur surgery on elbow 13
- The Cubs grounds crew was short staffed because the Cubs were trying to avoid Obamacare (247)
- Forgiveness for Pete Rose? Not in this lifetime (142)
- Cuban outfielder Rusney Castillo to sign with the Red Sox for $72 million (96)
- A pitch clock in Major League Baseball? No thanks. (92)
- Even if he’s reinstated, does Pete Rose make the Hall of Fame? (89)