Apr 24, 2014, 10:32 AM EDT
As I’ve stated several times in the past, I have am generally anti-DH for personal and subjective reasons, but I accept that it makes more logical sense for both leagues to have the DH. And I think it’ll happen eventually, my personal and subjective opinions notwithstanding.
To the extent people want to argue about it on objective, as opposed to subjective grounds, however, here’s a new data point for your consideration: the DH does not cause the games to go longer in any appreciable way. Carl Bialik of FiveThirtyEight looks at the data, and it’s pretty interesting.
You may now post 100 comments in which you try to disguise your personal preferences regarding the DH as objective criteria. I’ll start: it has been scientifically proven that liking the DH causes most cancers. Period.
- Monday’s White Sox/Orioles game postponed due to ongoing protests and violence in Baltimore 0
- Cardinals confirm Adam Wainwright is done for season with torn Achilles 5
- Source: Josh Hamilton rejected a trade to a National League team because he wanted to go back to Texas 24
- Deal done: Josh Hamilton traded to the Texas Rangers for cash considerations 29
- Pitchers batting is dumb and the DH should be universal 349
- And That Happened: Sunday’s scores and highlights 88
- Alex Rodriguez hits 659th career home run, now one shy of tying Willie Mays 60
- Max Scherzer doubtful for next start due to thumb injury 5
- Pitchers batting is dumb and the DH should be universal (349)
- Comment of the Day: do not underestimate the seriousness of the anti-DH crowd (183)
- The early leaders in MLB’s “Franchise Four” thing have been announced (166)
- The Royals and White Sox had a benches-clearing fracas, five players ejected (161)
- Protesters converge on Oriole Park at Camden Yards (149)