Skip to content

Reminder: almost everyone is placed on waivers in August

Aug 4, 2014, 11:35 AM EDT

AJ Burnett AJ Burnett

I just saw a news nugget about A.J. Burnett being placed on waivers by the Phillies. So, for (I think) the fifth but maybe the sixth year in a row, I remind you to not make a big deal out of a player being placed on waivers in August. What follows is a Copy-and-paste, but it’s one that still, apparently, needs to happen:

When people refer to waivers at this time of the year (i.e. after the trade deadline and before the end of the season) they almost certainly mean revocable waivers. Meaning that the team can pull the player back off waivers if the player is claimed. The reason for using revocable waivers? So a team can try to slip someone by every other team. Because, if they can and if the player goes unclaimed by every other team (i.e.  he “clears waivers”) he can be traded the same as he could have been before the deadline. He’d be eligible for the playoff roster and everything, as long as it was before the end of August.

If a player is claimed and his team does not pull him back that the claiming team is stuck with the player, including his current salary. This is why you get a lot of big names on waivers. Teams that would prefer not to pay that guy anymore would much rather give him up and his salary if they could, so they try. Rarely if ever will a highly-paid guy actually get claimed in such a fashion. If he was worth having at that price, he’d never be waived in the first place.

There are often games played with this process, of course. There is an order to the claiming process — teams with the worst record in the same league get to claim guys placed on waivers first, and then the choice cycles through the teams in the other league, worst record to best as well. Sometimes a team will claim a guy for the express purpose of NOT allowing him to clear waivers and thus be traded to a rival. For example, if the Brewers really wanted a player who was placed on waivers, the Pirates may claim him so he does not clear and thus may not be traded to the Brewers.  But of course there is that risk that the team placing the guy on waivers doesn’t pull him back, thus sticking him with Pittsburgh.

So that’s waivers. Ignore them for the most part. Pay closer attention if someone is claimed and if that someone does not have an albatross contract.  Pay closer attention if a guy clears waivers, because then he’s every bit as tradable as all players were back in July.

 

  1. dakotaandotter - Aug 4, 2014 at 11:42 AM

    If that’s the case then I’m claiming Mike Trout.

  2. karlkolchak - Aug 4, 2014 at 11:48 AM

    Anyone know where a running list is kept of the guys who manage to clear waivers?

    • chill1184 - Aug 4, 2014 at 11:50 AM

      I think MLB trade rumors does but not sure

      • karlkolchak - Aug 4, 2014 at 11:54 AM

        I’ll check there…Gracias!

  3. 1943mrmojorisin1971 - Aug 4, 2014 at 12:12 PM

    Ahh your yearly PSA. While you’re not wrong, I’ll never forget this one: http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/24/the-dodgers-claim-adrian-gonzalez-on-waivers-but-dont-get-too-excited-yet/

    • Craig Calcaterra - Aug 4, 2014 at 12:25 PM

      Well, I did say it was “interesting” and “worth watching.” But yeah, didn’t see that one comin’. Heh.

      • Francisco (FC) - Aug 4, 2014 at 1:24 PM

        This reminds me. The team placing the player on waivers has the option of negotiating a trade with the claiming team.

    • paul621 - Aug 4, 2014 at 7:53 PM

      That’s a fun comment thread to read through, too.

  4. danglickman - Aug 4, 2014 at 12:21 PM

    Reblogged this on The Baseball Continuum and commented:
    I normally don’t reblog other people’s stuff, but what Craig Calcaterra writes here is something good to keep in mind over the next month or so.

  5. rbj1 - Aug 4, 2014 at 1:27 PM

    See, for example, Jose Canseco winding up on the Yankees.

  6. scotttheskeptic - Aug 4, 2014 at 7:18 PM

    Craig, forgive for the belated question, but what happens if a guy has 10-5 rights and is claimed. Can he nix the claim, can he blunt a trade attempt? How does that work?

  7. twinfan24 - Aug 5, 2014 at 10:08 AM

    Except Joe Mauer. He was placed on waivers a couple of seasons ago. Casual fans flipped out because they do not understand the process. Twins brass stated that they would just not do that in the future, basically because too many people aren’t informed enough to understand the process, and with 10-5 rights, Joe isn’t going anywhere anyway.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

When home-field advantage isn't so
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. T. Lincecum (3166)
  2. M. Bumgarner (2825)
  3. M. Morse (2533)
  4. J. Shields (2275)
  5. Y. Cespedes (2102)
  1. H. Pence (1550)
  2. L. Cain (1518)
  3. T. Ishikawa (1514)
  4. U. Jimenez (1510)
  5. A. Wainwright (1507)