Skip to content

Derek Jeter: The Last Face of Baseball

Aug 5, 2014, 9:13 AM EDT

derek jeter getty Getty Images

A few weeks ago I wrote a little bit about who might follow Derek Jeter as the so-called “Face of Baseball.” I didn’t think too deeply about it, but in the course of my musings I noted that it may be tough to find one given that Derek Jeter has this quality about him — a mystery and a privacy, however pleasant it may be — which allows fans and the media to project our values on him and say “yep, he stands for what I stand for!”

I didn’t realize that, rather than being an odd quirk of Jeter’s persona that lends him to being the avatar of the game for so many, it’s an essential trait for anyone who would take that role. And that it’s a role — The Face of Baseball — that may now be obsolete.

I learned this by reading Jack Moore’s excellent article at the Hardball Times this morning, in which he explores why it is baseball (and all sports really) have historically needed a “face,” and how the media and marketing arms of professional sports have traditionally served as intermediaries between the sport and the fans and who promote that face. Intermediaries which communicate to fans the values the intermediaries want them to appreciate. This is all based on actual social science Moore talks about in which things like character, discipline, competition, nationalism and the like are appreciated and celebrated by sports fans and which they have come to expect as the primary mode of understanding sports as a default. Values that are even fetishized to some extent, I would argue.

The most prominent intermediary: the sports media. Reporters columnists and TV producers who play up these themes in their coverage. It’s impossible not to see this once you are aware of it. Think any column talking about a player’s character or about what makes him great, separate and apart from the fact that he hits the ball hard. The entire conversation of player character and attitude that utterly consumes sports radio and those shout-fests on ESPN. The little features at the top of or in the middle of broadcasts. The narratives that are applied to the stories of the games.

But Moore notes something important: in the past 15 years or so, the need for intermediaries like journalists and TV producers has become less necessary. We can mainline our sports via the Internet far more easily than we could before. This, for some, leads to a view of the game that is far more data-oriented than stories/values-oriented (think the sabermetric community). For those who still go through media intermediaries, there is a far wider choice of them, including intermediaries which may extoll a set of values which are radically different than the “hero/competitor/champion/gentlemen” values extolled by the traditional sporting press (think contrary bloggers who LOVE flamboyant showboats and don’t get too bent out of shape about PED users). And of course, the mainstream media and those sports yakkers are still out there pushing the idea of “winners” and “competitors” and “class acts” and all of that nonsense.

If the way baseball is consumed and understood has fragmented — and it clearly has — having a single face for baseball is an obsolete concept. For some it may be a hard-working, clean-living, marquee guy like Derek Jeter is assumed to be. For some it may be an entertaining/frustrating force of nature like Yasiel Puig. For some it may not be a face, but a heel. A guy who becomes an anti-hero just like heels have in wrestling since the 1990s. For others it may be no one, as they choose to just have the game pump into their veins via the visceral experience and data.

These are some pretty heady concepts about which I have always been vaguely aware and have promoted in piecemeal fashion, but which I am just now realizing, thanks to Moore’s piece, explain almost everything about what has shaped sports and sports media and the online conversation about baseball over the past several years.  Kudos to Moore for laying this out as he does here.

  1. jimpellegrino - Aug 5, 2014 at 3:53 PM

    At what point does this madness end? I’ve never seen anything in my life like the genuflection for this guy? Where is Paul Konerko’s farewell tour? My nephews ask, was Jordan really that good? I answered, even better than advertised. They ask me about Jeter and I saw no, not even close.

  2. provguard - Aug 5, 2014 at 4:30 PM

    Blows my mind, I thought Trout has been the face of baseball for awhile. I guess that is outside of New York!!!

  3. campcouch - Aug 5, 2014 at 7:44 PM

    When I think of baseball, Derek Jeter is not who comes to mind. Maybe he’s good advertisement wise, but he’s been pretty non-committal when it comes to issues in the sport. A neutral soundbyte here and there. Maybe that’s what MLB wants. I’m more apt to tell people that I saw Omar Vizquel play SS over Jeter so I don’t have that reverence for him that others do. To me, Alex Rodriguez is the real face of baseball. He’s been made the poster child of greatness, greed, cheating and redemption since he made his debut…and until he retires, he’ll still be it.

  4. ubii2001 - Aug 5, 2014 at 9:47 PM

    It’s been Jeter for almost 20 years.

  5. lgwelsh1 - Aug 7, 2014 at 6:25 AM

    When you think of the current faces of popular pro sports

    Baseball – Derek Jeter
    Basketball – LeBron James
    Football- Peyton Manning
    Hockey- Sidney Crosby
    Soccer- Cristiano Ronaldo

    A decade ago the names would have been different except JETER in my opinion.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Pitching vs. history in NL wild card game
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. D. Jeter (3028)
  2. R. Martin (2422)
  3. A. Rodriguez (2107)
  4. J. Hamilton (2051)
  5. D. Gordon (2005)
  1. J. Altuve (1977)
  2. C. Kershaw (1954)
  3. M. Shoemaker (1854)
  4. E. Volquez (1822)
  5. Y. Cespedes (1715)